Paper · 1983 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Influence of Summer Pruning and Tree Orientation on Net Photosynthesis, Transpiration, Shoot Growth, and Dry-weight Distribution in Young Apple Trees1

S. C. Myers; D. C. Ferree

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
15
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Young, actively growing, container-grown Malling Merton (MM) 106 apple trees ( Malus domestica Borkh.), trained to a single shoot in a greenhouse, were oriented at vertical, 45° from vertical (45°), 90° from vertical (90°), or 90° from vertical and rotated at 1 rpm (90° rotated), and summer-pruned to remove none or 50% of 70.0-cm shoots. Orientation in a nonvertical position and summer pruning delayed a decline in net photosynthesis (Pn) exhibited by vertical unpruned trees. Pruning but not orientation increased total shoot growth, shoot number, and the number and total area of leaves of subsequent growth, but decreased average leaf size. Within 1 week after orientation, unpruned trees at 45° or 90° showed a decline of terminal shoot growth. However, 60 days after pruning a delayed growth of axillary shoots along the tree axis resulted in no difference in total shoot growth, leaf area, or leaf number on subsequent growth compared to vertical unpruned trees. Orientation at 45° and 90° increased the dry-weight root:shoot ratio and induced rootsuckers. Pruning decreased the root dry weight in all tree orientations. Rotation of unpruned trees increased apical growth, axillary shoot numbers, and dry weight of subsequent growth, and decreased root growth compared to unrotated trees.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nonvertical orientation delayed the decline in apple tree net photosynthesis.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae1
Treatment
Orientation in a nonvertical positione0
Outcome
net photosynthesis (Pn)e0
Direction
delayed a declinee0
Comparator
vertical unpruned treese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Orientation in a nonvertical position and summer pruning delayed a decline in net photosynthesis (Pn) exhibited by vertical unpruned trees.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–488 · show in text ↑
e1

“apple trees ( Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Summer pruning delayed the decline in apple tree net photosynthesis.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae1
Treatment
summer pruninge0
Outcome
net photosynthesis (Pn)e0
Direction
delayed a declinee0
Comparator
vertical unpruned treese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Orientation in a nonvertical position and summer pruning delayed a decline in net photosynthesis (Pn) exhibited by vertical unpruned trees.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–488 · show in text ↑
e1

“apple trees ( Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning increased total shoot growth, shoot number, and the number of leaves of subsequent growth.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae1
Treatment
Pruninge0
Outcome
total shoot growth, shoot number, and the numbere0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pruning but not orientation increased total shoot growth, shoot number, and the number and total area of leaves of subsequent growth, but decreased average leaf size.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–655 · show in text ↑
e1

“apple trees ( Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning increased total leaf area of subsequent growth.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae1
Treatment
Pruninge0
Outcome
total area of leavese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pruning but not orientation increased total shoot growth, shoot number, and the number and total area of leaves of subsequent growth, but decreased average leaf size.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–655 · show in text ↑
e1

“apple trees ( Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning decreased average leaf size.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae1
Treatment
Pruninge0
Outcome
average leaf sizee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pruning but not orientation increased total shoot growth, shoot number, and the number and total area of leaves of subsequent growth, but decreased average leaf size.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–655 · show in text ↑
e1

“apple trees ( Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unpruned trees oriented at 45° or 90° had declining terminal shoot growth within one week.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae1
Treatment
45° or 90°e0
Outcome
terminal shoot growthe0
Direction
declinee0
Qualifier
Within 1 weeke0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Within 1 week after orientation, unpruned trees at 45° or 90° showed a decline of terminal shoot growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–760 · show in text ↑
e1

“apple trees ( Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sixty days after pruning, delayed axillary shoot growth left no difference in total shoot growth, leaf area, or leaf number relative to vertical unpruned trees.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae1
Treatment
pruninge0
Outcome
total shoot growth, leaf area, or leaf numbere0
Direction
no differencee0
Qualifier
60 days after pruninge0
Comparator
vertical unpruned treese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“60 days after pruning a delayed growth of axillary shoots along the tree axis resulted in no difference in total shoot growth, leaf area, or leaf number on subsequent growth compared to vertical unpruned trees.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–980 · show in text ↑
e1

“apple trees ( Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Orientation at 45° and 90° increased the dry-weight root-to-shoot ratio and induced root suckers.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae1
Treatment
Orientation at 45° and 90°e0
Outcome
dry-weight root:shoot ratio and induced rootsuckerse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Orientation at 45° and 90° increased the dry-weight root:shoot ratio and induced rootsuckers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1074 · show in text ↑
e1

“apple trees ( Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning decreased root dry weight at every tree orientation.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae1
Treatment
Pruninge0
Outcome
root dry weighte0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
all tree orientationse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pruning decreased the root dry weight in all tree orientations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1138 · show in text ↑
e1

“apple trees ( Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotation of unpruned trees increased apical growth, axillary shoot numbers, and subsequent growth dry weight.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae1
Treatment
Rotation of unpruned treese0
Outcome
apical growth, axillary shoot numbers, and dry weight of subsequent growthe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
unrotated treese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rotation of unpruned trees increased apical growth, axillary shoot numbers, and dry weight of subsequent growth, and decreased root growth compared to unrotated trees.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1306 · show in text ↑
e1

“apple trees ( Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotation decreased root growth in unpruned trees relative to unrotated trees.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae1
Treatment
Rotation of unpruned treese0
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
unrotated treese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rotation of unpruned trees increased apical growth, axillary shoot numbers, and dry weight of subsequent growth, and decreased root growth compared to unrotated trees.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1306 · show in text ↑
e1

“apple trees ( Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–111 · show in text ↑

pruning · physiology: photosynthesis · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 14 positive, 11 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

pruning · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

106 papers: 58 positive, 48 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

102 papers more in this group

See all 106 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.