Paper · 2022 · Research Biotica

Nutrient Concentrations and Their Total Uptake as Affected by Liquid Bio-Fertilizers in Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)

Neelam Singh; Ekta Joshi; D.S. Sasode; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment entitled “Nutrient concentrations and their total uptake as affected by liquid bio-fertilizers in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)" was conducted during kharif season of 2017 at research farm, COA, Gwalior on sandy clay loam soil to study the response of groundnut to chemical fertilizers and liquid bio-formulations. Four fertility levels viz., 25, 50, 75 and 100% RDF and three biofertilizer inoculation viz., no bio-formulations (B1), liquid Bio-NPK + Zn solubilizing bacteria (B2) and bio-grow (B3) to groundnut in 12 treatment combinations replicated thrice in split plot design. The yield and nutrient concentrations and their total uptake (N, P, K, Zn) was significantly highest with 100% RDF and liquid Bio-NPK + Zn solubilizing bacteria. However, their interaction had no significant influence on these parameters. But the highest values were observed when 100% RDF was applied in combination with liquid Bio-NPK + Zn solubilizing bacteria.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield and nutrient concentrations and uptake were highest with 100% RDF.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
100% RDFe0
Outcome
yield and nutrient concentrations and their total uptake (N, P, K, Zn)e0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“groundnut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 88–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“The yield and nutrient concentrations and their total uptake (N, P, K, Zn) was significantly highest with 100% RDF and liquid Bio-NPK + Zn solubilizing bacteria.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield and nutrient concentrations and uptake were highest with liquid Bio-NPK plus Zn solubilizing bacteria.

Taxon
GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
liquid Bio-NPK + Zn solubilizing bacteriae0
Interactor
Zn solubilizing bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
yield and nutrient concentrations and their total uptake (N, P, K, Zn)e0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“The yield and nutrient concentrations and their total uptake (N, P, K, Zn) was significantly highest with 100% RDF and liquid Bio-NPK + Zn solubilizing bacteria.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–764 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer and biofertilizer interaction had no significant effect on these parameters.

Taxon
GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
their interactione0
Outcome
these parameterse0
Direction
no significant influencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“their interaction had no significant influence on these parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of 100% RDF and liquid Bio-NPK plus Zn solubilizing bacteria gave the highest values.

Taxon
GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
100% RDF was applied in combination with liquid Bio-NPK + Zn solubilizing bacteriae0
Interactor
Zn solubilizing bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
highest valuese0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“the highest values were observed when 100% RDF was applied in combination with liquid Bio-NPK + Zn solubilizing bacteria.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–967 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

68 papers: 65 positive, 3 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

inoculation · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

221 papers: 198 positive, 23 negative or no effect

197 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

217 papers more in this group

See all 221 papers →

fertilization · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

683 papers: 635 positive, 48 negative or no effect

634 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

679 papers more in this group

See all 683 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.