Paper · 2022 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Scions impact biomass allocation and root enzymatic activity of rootstocks in grafted melon and watermelon plants

Glenda Sallaku; Boris Rewald; Hans Sandén; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Vegetable grafting is increasingly recognized as an effective and sustainable plant production alternative. Grafted plants usually show increased uptake of water and minerals compared with self-rooted plants, mostly thought a consequence of the vigorous rootstocks selected. However, while studies frequently addressed the effects of rootstocks on the performance of scions, knowledge on the influences of scions on biomass allocation, morphology, and metabolic activity of roots is rare. In particular, the plasticity of root traits affecting resource acquisition and its efficiency remains poorly understood. Two different rootstock species, Cucurbita maxima × Cucurbita moschata and Lagenaria siceraria , were grafted in combination with melon ( Cucumis melo ) and watermelon ( Citrullus lanatus ). Self-grafted rootstocks were used as control. Plant biomass and root traits were determined after destructive harvesting 30 and/or 60 days after grafting. Traits included biomass allocation, leaf and root morphology, potential activities of four extracellular enzymes on root tips and basal root segments, and root respiration. Successfully grafted scions increase the ratio of root to whole plant dry matter (RMF), and increased ratios of root length to whole plant dry matter (RLR) and to plant leaf area (RL : LA). In contrast, morphological root traits such as diameter, tissue density, and specific root length remain surprisingly stable, and thus scion-induced changes of those traits may only play a minor role for the beneficial effects of grafting in Cucurbitaceae. Incompatibility in melon/ L. siceraria grafts, however, was likely responsible for the reduced root growth in combination with clear changes in root morphological traits. Reduced root respiration rates seem to be the effects of a non-compatible rootstock–scion combination rather than an active, C-efficiency increasing acclimation. In contrast, heterografts with melon and watermelon frequently resulted in root-stock-specific, often enhanced potential enzymatic activities of acid phosphatase, β -glucosidase, leucine-amino-peptidase, and N-acetyl-glucosaminidase both at root tips and basal parts of lateral roots—presenting a potential and complementary mechanism of grafted plants to enhance nutrient foraging. The studied melon and watermelon scions may thus increase the nutrient foraging capacity of grafted plants by fostering the relative allocation of C to the root system, and enhancing the extracellular enzymatic activities governed by roots or their rhizobiome.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Successful scion grafting increased root dry matter fraction.

Taxon
melon and watermelon plantsCitrullus lanatusCucumis melot0
Treatment
Successfully grafted scionse0
Outcome
ratio of root to whole plant dry matter (RMF)e0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“grafted melon and watermelon plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“Successfully grafted scions increase the ratio of root to whole plant dry matter (RMF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1216 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Successful scion grafting increased root length relative to whole plant dry matter and leaf area.

Taxon
melon and watermelon plantsCitrullus lanatusCucumis melot0
Treatment
graftedt0
Outcome
ratios of root length to whole plant dry matter (RLR) and to plant leaf area (RL : LA)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“grafted melon and watermelon plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“increased ratios of root length to whole plant dry matter (RLR) and to plant leaf area (RL : LA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1318 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root diameter, tissue density and specific root length remained stable with scion grafting.

Taxon
melon and watermelon plantsCitrullus lanatusCucumis melot0
Treatment
graftedt0
Outcome
diameter, tissue density, and specific root lengthe0
Direction
remain surprisingly stablee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“grafted melon and watermelon plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“morphological root traits such as diameter, tissue density, and specific root length remain surprisingly stable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1444 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incompatible melon and L. siceraria grafts had reduced root growth.

Taxon
melonCucumis meloe0
Material
L. sicerariae0
Treatment
melon/ L. siceraria graftse0
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“grafted melon and watermelon plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“Incompatibility in melon/ L. siceraria grafts, however, was likely responsible for the reduced root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1577–1683 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incompatible melon and L. siceraria grafts had clear changes in root morphology.

Taxon
melonCucumis meloe0
Material
L. sicerariae0
Outcome
clear changes in root morphological traitse0
Qualifier
Incompatibilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“grafted melon and watermelon plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“Incompatibility in melon/ L. siceraria grafts, however, was likely responsible for the reduced root growth in combination with clear changes in root morphological traits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1577–1747 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root respiration rates were reduced in a non-compatible graft combination.

Taxon
melon and watermelon plantsCitrullus lanatusCucumis melot0
Treatment
non-compatible rootstock–scion combinatione0
Outcome
root respiration ratese0
Direction
Reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“grafted melon and watermelon plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“Reduced root respiration rates seem to be the effects of a non-compatible rootstock–scion combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1748–1849 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Melon and watermelon heterografts often enhanced root extracellular enzyme activities.

Taxon
melon and watermelonCitrullus lanatusCucumis meloe0
Organ / stage
root tips and basal parts of lateral rootse0
Treatment
heterografts with melon and watermelone0
Outcome
potential enzymatic activities of acid phosphatase, β -glucosidase, leucine-amino-peptidase, and N-acetyl-glucosaminidasee0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
root-stock-specifice0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“grafted melon and watermelon plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“heterografts with melon and watermelon frequently resulted in root-stock-specific, often enhanced potential enzymatic activities of acid phosphatase, β -glucosidase, leucine-amino-peptidase, and N-acetyl-glucosaminidase both at root tips and basal parts of lateral roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1923–2193 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that melon and watermelon scions may increase nutrient foraging capacity through root carbon allocation and extracellular enzymes.

Taxon
melon and watermelonCitrullus lanatusCucumis meloe0
Outcome
nutrient foraging capacitye0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
relative allocation of C to the root system, and enhancing the extracellular enzymatic activitiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“melon and watermelon scions may thus increase the nutrient foraging capacity of grafted plants by fostering the relative allocation of C to the root system, and enhancing the extracellular enzymatic activities governed by roots or their rhizobiome”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2305–2552 · show in text ↑

Lagenaria siceraria · growth · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

grafting · growth · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

69 papers: 62 positive, 7 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

grafting · growth · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 34 positive, 5 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.