Paper · 2003 · Journal of Plant Production

RESPONSE OF COTTON CULTIVAR GIZA 83 TO FOLIAR APPLICATION OF ETHREL (ETHEPHON) IN LOW CONCENTRATIONS UNDER LATE PLANTING CONDITIONS

M. Kassem,

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The present study was carried out at Mallawi Agric. Res. Station, Minia, in 2001 and 2002 seasons to study the effect of foliar application of ethrel (ethephon) in low concentrations (0, 10, 20 and 40 ppm) at squaring stage or at early flowering stage on late sown cotton plants of Giza 83 cultivar. The obtained results showed that, in comparison with the control, ethrel tended to decrease plant height, leaves content of chlorophyll and number of days to first open boll with increasing the reduction in Ihese traits as ethrel concentration increased. On the other hand, aU ethrel concentrations, In generat, increased leaves content of sugars, number of sympodla, flowers, and open bolls per plant, boll relenlion%, ear1iness%. and seed colton yield per faddan, however, all of these traits were significantly increased over the control only by 10 or 20 ppm which gave Ihe highest yield and the best results in general. Fiber properties were not affected by ethrel treatments. Both time of application and the interaction between time of application and elhrel concsntration had almost no rnarxed affects on plant growth and yield. It could be concluded that treatment of late sown cotton plants with 10 or 20 ppm of ethrel at either squaring stage or early flowering stage improved the plant fruiting performance and yield under lale planting conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethrel tended to reduce cotton plant height, chlorophyll and days to first open boll with greater reduction at higher concentration.

Material
GIZA 83t0
Treatment
ethrele0
Outcome
plant height, leaves content of chlorophyll and number of days to first open bolle0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ethrel tended to decrease plant height, leaves content of chlorophyll and number of days to first open boll with increasing the reduction in Ihese traits as ethrel concentration increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–553 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON CULTIVAR GIZA 83”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–35 · show in text ↑
e1

“in comparison with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–364 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethrel generally increased leaf sugars, fruiting traits, earliness and seed cotton yield.

Treatment
ethrele1
Outcome
leaves content of sugars, number of sympodla, flowerse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased leaves content of sugars, number of sympodla, flowers, and open bolls per plant, boll relenlion%, ear1iness%. and seed colton yield per faddan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–764 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
e1

“as ethrel concentration increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–553 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly increased over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–840 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Only 10 or 20 ppm ethrel significantly increased these traits and gave the highest yield.

Treatment
10 or 20 ppme0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all of these traits were significantly increased over the control only by 10 or 20 ppm which gave Ihe highest yield and the best results in general”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–922 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethrel did not affect fiber properties.

Treatment
ethrel treatmentse0
Outcome
Fiber propertiese0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fiber properties were not affected by ethrel treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application time and its interaction with concentration had almost no marked effects on plant growth and yield.

Treatment
time of applicatione0
Outcome
plant growth and yielde0
Direction
almost no rnarxed affectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both time of application and the interaction between time of application and elhrel concsntration had almost no rnarxed affects on plant growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1134 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 10 or 20 ppm ethrel at squaring or early flowering for late-sown cotton.

Treatment
10 or 20 ppm of ethrele0
Outcome
improved the plant fruiting performance and yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment of late sown cotton plants with 10 or 20 ppm of ethrel at either squaring stage or early flowering stage improved the plant fruiting performance and yield under lale planting conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1358 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

11 papers: 3 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · phenology · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.