Paper · 2007 · Journal of Plant Production

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT TYPES AND LEVELS OF ORGANIC FERTILIZERS COMBINED WITH BIOFERTILIZER ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF TOMATO GROWN IN SANDY SOIL

M. Saleh,; Fayza Darwish; Mona Hanna

11
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field trail was carried out in sandy soil at Borollous location North Nile Delta, Kafr EL-Sheikh Governorate during two successive summer seasons of 2003 and 2004. The study concerned with the effect of different types and levels of organic manures combined with inoculation of tomato plants with Mycorrhiza and Azospirillum as biofertilizers on plant growth, yield and its components as well as fruit quality. Besides, the microbiological activity in rhizosphere area of tomato root in terms of Mycorrhiza root colonization, the cell counts of Azospirillum and nitrogenous activity were also studied. Results revealed that the highest vegetative growth i.e. stem length, number of branches and leaves as well as fresh and dry weight of tomato plant were obtained by applying 10 ton/fed. of chicken manure + biofertilizers. On the contrary the lowest values were recorded with the other compost treatments included in this study i.e. Obour, Biogreen and EL-Arish with biofertilizer. Regarding plant chemical constituents, i.e. NPK, chlorophyll as well as fruit chemical contents, i.e. acidity, Vitamin C and TSS, results showed that the leaf content of chlorophyll as well as N, P, were higher by using chicken manure combined with bio fertilizer than the other studied types of compost. The concentration of vitamin C in tomato fruit increased significantly by using chicken manure combined with Bio-fertilizers. Tomato plants fertilized with chicken manure at a rate of 8 ton /fed. combined with biofertilizer produced the highest fruit yield as compared with the other tested treatments in this study. Concerning root rhizosphere tomato microbial activity, results revealed that all tested treatments increased significantly all microbial tested parameters over the control in both seasons. However, using chicken manure + biofertilizers gave the highest percentage of root Mycorrhiza colonization, as well as cell counts of Azospirillum and nitrogenase activity compared to the other tested organic manures + biofertilizer including control treatment. It can be recommended that chicken manure at a rate of 8 ton /fed + biofertilizer, which gave the highest fruit yield with best quality as well as microbial activity for the root rhizosphere, can be used for tomato cultivation in sandy soil. Moreover, producing tomato crop free from any chemical residues, through avoiding the use of chemical fertilizers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 10 ton/fed. of chicken manure with biofertilizers gave the highest stem length, number of branches and leaves.

Taxon
tomato plantSolanum lycopersicume1
Treatment
10 ton/fed. of chicken manure + biofertilizerse1
Outcome
stem length, number of branches and leavese1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the highest vegetative growth i.e. stem length, number of branches and leaves as well as fresh and dry weight of tomato plant were obtained by applying 10 ton/fed. of chicken manure + biofertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–824 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 10 ton/fed. of chicken manure with biofertilizers gave the highest fresh and dry weight of tomato plants.

Taxon
tomato plantSolanum lycopersicume1
Treatment
10 ton/fed. of chicken manure + biofertilizerse1
Outcome
fresh and dry weighte1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the highest vegetative growth i.e. stem length, number of branches and leaves as well as fresh and dry weight of tomato plant were obtained by applying 10 ton/fed. of chicken manure + biofertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–824 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The other compost treatments with biofertilizer gave the lowest vegetative growth of tomato.

Treatment
Obour, Biogreen and EL-Arish with biofertilizere3
Outcome
vegetative growthe4
Direction
loweste3
Comparator
chicken manure + biofertilizerse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“GROWTH AND YIELD OF TOMATO GROWN IN SANDY SOIL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–137 · show in text ↑
e3

“On the contrary the lowest values were recorded with the other compost treatments included in this study i.e. Obour, Biogreen and EL-Arish with biofertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–983 · show in text ↑
e4

“the highest vegetative growth i.e. stem length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–672 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest vegetative growth i.e. stem length, number of branches and leaves as well as fresh and dry weight of tomato plant were obtained by applying 10 ton/fed. of chicken manure + biofertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–824 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chicken manure with biofertilizer gave higher leaf chlorophyll, N and P than the other compost types.

Treatment
chicken manure combined with bio fertilizere5
Outcome
leaf content of chlorophyll as well as N, Pe5
Direction
highere5
Comparator
the other studied types of composte5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“GROWTH AND YIELD OF TOMATO GROWN IN SANDY SOIL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–137 · show in text ↑
e5

“the leaf content of chlorophyll as well as N, P, were higher by using chicken manure combined with bio fertilizer than the other studied types of compost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1288 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chicken manure combined with biofertilizers significantly increased the vitamin C concentration in tomato fruit.

Organ / stage
fruite6
Treatment
chicken manure combined with Bio-fertilizerse6
Outcome
concentration of vitamin C in tomato fruite6
Direction
increased significantlye6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The concentration of vitamin C in tomato fruit increased significantly by using chicken manure combined with Bio-fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1414 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato fertilized with chicken manure at 8 ton/fed. with biofertilizer gave the highest fruit yield.

Taxon
Tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume7
Treatment
chicken manure at a rate of 8 ton /fed. combined with biofertilizere7
Outcome
fruit yielde7
Direction
higheste7
Comparator
the other tested treatmentse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Tomato plants fertilized with chicken manure at a rate of 8 ton /fed. combined with biofertilizer produced the highest fruit yield as compared with the other tested treatments in this study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1605 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested treatments significantly increased all rhizosphere microbial parameters over the control in both seasons.

Treatment
all tested treatmentse1
Outcome
all microbial tested parameterse1
Direction
increased significantlye1
Comparator
the controle1
Setting
both seasonse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“GROWTH AND YIELD OF TOMATO GROWN IN SANDY SOIL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–137 · show in text ↑
e1

“all tested treatments increased significantly all microbial tested parameters over the control in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1684–1794 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chicken manure with biofertilizers gave the highest percentage of root Mycorrhiza colonization of tomato.

Treatment
chicken manure + biofertilizerse1
Interactor
Mycorrhizae1symbiont
Second interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume1symbiont
Outcome
percentage of root Mycorrhiza colonizatione1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
the other tested organic manures + biofertilizer including control treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · Second interactorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“GROWTH AND YIELD OF TOMATO GROWN IN SANDY SOIL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–137 · show in text ↑
e1

“using chicken manure + biofertilizers gave the highest percentage of root Mycorrhiza colonization, as well as cell counts of Azospirillum and nitrogenase activity compared to the other tested organic manures + biofertilizer including control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1805–2056 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chicken manure with biofertilizers gave the highest Azospirillum cell counts and nitrogenase activity in tomato rhizosphere.

Treatment
chicken manure + biofertilizerse1
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume1symbiont
Outcome
cell counts of Azospirillum and nitrogenase activitye1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
the other tested organic manures + biofertilizer including control treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“GROWTH AND YIELD OF TOMATO GROWN IN SANDY SOIL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–137 · show in text ↑
e1

“using chicken manure + biofertilizers gave the highest percentage of root Mycorrhiza colonization, as well as cell counts of Azospirillum and nitrogenase activity compared to the other tested organic manures + biofertilizer including control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1805–2056 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Chicken manure at 8 ton/fed. with biofertilizer can be used for tomato cultivation in sandy soil.

Treatment
chicken manure at a rate of 8 ton /fed + biofertilizere1
Outcome
tomato cultivation in sandy soile1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“It can be recommended that chicken manure at a rate of 8 ton /fed + biofertilizer, which gave the highest fruit yield with best quality as well as microbial activity for the root rhizosphere, can be used for tomato cultivation in sandy soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2058–2298 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Avoiding chemical fertilizers allows producing tomato crop free from chemical residues.

Treatment
avoiding the use of chemical fertilizerse1
Outcome
producing tomato crop free from any chemical residuese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“producing tomato crop free from any chemical residues, through avoiding the use of chemical fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2310–2413 · show in text ↑

inoculation · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 49 positive, 4 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 84 positive, 21 negative or no effect

83 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

fertilization · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

111 papers: 94 positive, 17 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

171 papers: 155 positive, 16 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

167 papers more in this group

See all 171 papers →

inoculation · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

201 papers: 172 positive, 29 negative or no effect

171 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

197 papers more in this group

See all 201 papers →

inoculation · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

266 papers: 136 positive, 130 negative or no effect

135 papers in the same direction as this paper · 128 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

262 papers more in this group

See all 266 papers →

inoculation · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

441 papers: 387 positive, 54 negative or no effect

386 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

437 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

fertilization · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

668 papers: 567 positive, 101 negative or no effect

566 papers in the same direction as this paper · 93 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

664 papers more in this group

See all 668 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.