Paper · 2022 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Genotype, mycorrhizae, and herbivory interact to shape strawberry plant functional traits

Robert L. Whyle; Amy M. Trowbridge; Mary A. Jamieson

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
6
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and herbivores are ubiquitous biotic agents affecting plant fitness. While individual effects of pairwise interactions have been well-studied, less is known about how species interactions above and belowground interact to influence phenotypic plasticity in plant functional traits, especially phytochemicals. We hypothesized that mycorrhizae would mitigate negative herbivore effects by enhancing plant physiology and reproductive traits. Furthermore, we expected genotypic variation would influence functional trait responses to these biotic agents. To test these hypotheses, we conducted a manipulative field-based experiment with three strawberry ( Fragaria x ananassa) genotypes to evaluate plant phenotypic plasticity in multiple functional traits. We used a fully-crossed factorial design in which plants from each genotype were exposed to mycorrhizal inoculation, herbivory, and the combined factors to examine effects on plant growth, reproduction, and floral volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Genotype and herbivory were key determinants of phenotypic variation, especially for plant physiology, biomass allocation, and floral volatiles. Mycorrhizal inoculation increased total leaf area, but only in plants that received no herbivory, and also enhanced flower and fruit numbers across genotypes and herbivory treatments. Total fruit biomass increased for one genotype, with up to 30-40% higher overall yield depending on herbivory. Herbivory altered floral volatile profiles and increased total terpenoid emissions. The effects of biotic treatments, however, were less important than the overall influence of genotype on floral volatile composition and emissions. This study demonstrates how genotypic variation affects plant phenotypic plasticity to herbivory and mycorrhizae, playing a key role in shaping physiological and phytochemical traits that directly and indirectly influence productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype and herbivory determined variation in physiology, biomass allocation and floral volatiles.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Material
Genotypee0
Treatment
herbivorye0
Outcome
plant physiology, biomass allocation, and floral volatilese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genotype and herbivory were key determinants of phenotypic variation, especially for plant physiology, biomass allocation, and floral volatiles.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1182 · show in text ↑
t0

“Genotype, mycorrhizae, and herbivory interact to shape strawberry plant functional traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation increased leaf area only without herbivory.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Mycorrhizal inoculatione0
Interactor
Mycorrhizale0symbiont
Outcome
total leaf areae0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
only in plants that received no herbivorye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhizal inoculation increased total leaf area, but only in plants that received no herbivory”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1279 · show in text ↑
t0

“Genotype, mycorrhizae, and herbivory interact to shape strawberry plant functional traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation enhanced flower and fruit numbers across genotypes and herbivory treatments.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Mycorrhizal inoculatione1
Outcome
flower and fruit numberse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“enhanced flower and fruit numbers across genotypes and herbivory treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1366 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mycorrhizal inoculation increased total leaf area, but only in plants that received no herbivory”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1279 · show in text ↑
t0

“Genotype, mycorrhizae, and herbivory interact to shape strawberry plant functional traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total fruit biomass increased for one genotype by up to 30-40%, depending on herbivory.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Mycorrhizal inoculatione1
Outcome
Total fruit biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
30-40%e0
Qualifier
one genotypee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total fruit biomass increased for one genotype, with up to 30-40% higher overall yield depending on herbivory.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1367–1477 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mycorrhizal inoculation increased total leaf area, but only in plants that received no herbivory”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1279 · show in text ↑
t0

“Genotype, mycorrhizae, and herbivory interact to shape strawberry plant functional traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbivory altered floral volatile profiles.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Herbivorye0
Outcome
floral volatile profilese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbivory altered floral volatile profiles and increased total terpenoid emissions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1561 · show in text ↑
t0

“Genotype, mycorrhizae, and herbivory interact to shape strawberry plant functional traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbivory increased total terpenoid emissions.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Herbivorye0
Outcome
total terpenoid emissionse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbivory altered floral volatile profiles and increased total terpenoid emissions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1561 · show in text ↑
t0

“Genotype, mycorrhizae, and herbivory interact to shape strawberry plant functional traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–89 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype influenced floral volatile composition and emissions more than biotic treatments.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Material
genotypee0
Outcome
floral volatile composition and emissionse0
Direction
less importante0
Comparator
biotic treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of biotic treatments, however, were less important than the overall influence of genotype on floral volatile composition and emissions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1562–1709 · show in text ↑
t0

“Genotype, mycorrhizae, and herbivory interact to shape strawberry plant functional traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–89 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

34 papers: 30 positive, 4 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

inoculation · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

67 papers: 60 positive, 7 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 32 positive, 1 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

inoculation · growth · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 45 positive, 16 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.