Paper · 2022 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Potential of Different Nitrification Inhibitors on Growth of Late Sown Cauliflower Var. Pusa Snowball K-1 and Behavior of Soil NH4+ and NO3- in Typic Eutrochrept Under Mid Hills of NW Himalayas

Shubham; Uday Sharma; Rajesh Kaushal

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Towering losses of applied N in the region lead this study to identify the best potent nitrification inhibitors in late sown cauliflower (Pusa Snowball K-1), which could be easily available and eco-friendly. A field experiment was conducted for two consecutive years (2018–19 & 2019–20) with different inhibitors doses supplemented with NPK fertilizer and farmyard manure in CRBD with 3 replications. Results showed that application of recommended dose of fertilizer [N, P & K (125:76:72 kg ha-1)] with inhibitor neem cake (20 g/kg soil) +FYM (250 q/ha) recorded highest nitrogen uptake (92 & 98.9 kg ha-1) for both years, results were comparable to CaC2 treatment (89.4 & 94.7 kg ha-1). Highest nitrogen content in cauliflower with values 7.52 and 7.65%, plant height of 68.43 and 68.90 cm was observed with NPK+ neem cake @20 g/kg soil with statistical significance among all. Regarding growth, increased polar (14.51 & 16.08 cm) and equatorial diameter (17.95 & 18.21 cm) with highest leaf count of 21.42 & 21.96 in 2018–19 & 19–20, respectively were recorded under neem cake. Besides neem cake, melia @ 20 g/kg soil improved growth and lowered the levels of soil nitrate i.e. 42.93 and 40.31 kg/ha where highest i.e. 55.61&51.29 kg/ha were recorded in Pomegranate rind @10 g/kg soil and proved a better inhibitor. Nitrate levels have been decreased in 2019–20 as compared to 2018–19. Therefore, two years of open field research identified neem cake and melia as prominent and potent nitrification inhibitors for cauliflower under mid hilly conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem cake with NPK and FYM gave the highest cauliflower nitrogen uptake in both years, comparable to CaC2.

Treatment
recommended dose of fertilizer [N, P & K (125:76:72 kg ha-1)] with inhibitor neem cake (20 g/kg soil) +FYM (250 q/ha)e0
Outcome
nitrogen uptakee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
92 & 98.9 kg ha-1e0
Qualifier
89.4 & 94.7 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
CaC2 treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of recommended dose of fertilizer [N, P & K (125:76:72 kg ha-1)] with inhibitor neem cake (20 g/kg soil) +FYM (250 q/ha) recorded highest nitrogen uptake (92 & 98.9 kg ha-1) for both years, results were comparable to CaC2 treatment (89.4 & 94.7 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–686 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK plus neem cake produced the highest cauliflower nitrogen content, significantly among treatments.

Treatment
NPK+ neem cake @20 g/kg soile0
Outcome
nitrogen contente0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
7.52 and 7.65%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest nitrogen content in cauliflower with values 7.52 and 7.65%, plant height of 68.43 and 68.90 cm was observed with NPK+ neem cake @20 g/kg soil with statistical significance among all.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–878 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK plus neem cake produced the highest cauliflower plant height, significantly among treatments.

Treatment
NPK+ neem cake @20 g/kg soile0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
68.43 and 68.90 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest nitrogen content in cauliflower with values 7.52 and 7.65%, plant height of 68.43 and 68.90 cm was observed with NPK+ neem cake @20 g/kg soil with statistical significance among all.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–878 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem cake increased cauliflower polar diameter in the two years.

Treatment
neem cakee0
Outcome
polare0
Direction
increasede0
Value
14.51 & 16.08 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased polar (14.51 & 16.08 cm) and equatorial diameter (17.95 & 18.21 cm) with highest leaf count of 21.42 & 21.96 in 2018–19 & 19–20, respectively were recorded under neem cake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1078 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem cake increased cauliflower equatorial diameter in the two years.

Treatment
neem cakee0
Outcome
equatorial diametere0
Direction
increasede0
Value
17.95 & 18.21 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased polar (14.51 & 16.08 cm) and equatorial diameter (17.95 & 18.21 cm) with highest leaf count of 21.42 & 21.96 in 2018–19 & 19–20, respectively were recorded under neem cake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1078 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem cake produced the highest cauliflower leaf count in the two years.

Treatment
neem cakee0
Outcome
leaf counte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
21.42 & 21.96e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased polar (14.51 & 16.08 cm) and equatorial diameter (17.95 & 18.21 cm) with highest leaf count of 21.42 & 21.96 in 2018–19 & 19–20, respectively were recorded under neem cake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1078 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Melia at 20 g/kg soil improved cauliflower growth.

Treatment
melia @ 20 g/kg soile0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“melia @ 20 g/kg soil improved growth and lowered the levels of soil nitrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1174 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Melia at 20 g/kg soil lowered soil nitrate levels to 42.93 and 40.31 kg/ha.

Treatment
melia @ 20 g/kg soile0
Outcome
levels of soil nitratee0
Direction
lowerede0
Value
42.93 and 40.31 kg/hae0
Comparator
Pomegranate rind @10 g/kg soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“melia @ 20 g/kg soil improved growth and lowered the levels of soil nitrate i.e. 42.93 and 40.31 kg/ha where highest i.e. 55.61&51.29 kg/ha were recorded in Pomegranate rind @10 g/kg soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1286 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pomegranate rind at 10 g/kg soil yielded the highest soil nitrate levels.

Treatment
Pomegranate rind @10 g/kg soile0
Outcome
soil nitratee1
Direction
higheste0
Value
55.61&51.29 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest i.e. 55.61&51.29 kg/ha were recorded in Pomegranate rind @10 g/kg soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1286 · show in text ↑
e1

“melia @ 20 g/kg soil improved growth and lowered the levels of soil nitrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1174 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil nitrate levels decreased in 2019–20 relative to 2018–19.

Outcome
Nitrate levelse0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
2018–19e0
Setting
2019–20e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrate levels have been decreased in 2019–20 as compared to 2018–19.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1387 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–82 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identified neem cake and melia as potent nitrification inhibitors for cauliflower in mid hills.

Outcome
neem cake and melia as prominent and potent nitrification inhibitorse0
Setting
mid hilly conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two years of open field research identified neem cake and melia as prominent and potent nitrification inhibitors for cauliflower under mid hilly conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1399–1554 · show in text ↑

botanical · nutrient: content · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

potassium · nutrient: content · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 11 positive, 4 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 35 positive, 11 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

botanical · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

75 papers: 42 positive, 33 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

146 papers: 127 positive, 19 negative or no effect

126 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

142 papers more in this group

See all 146 papers →

fertilization · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

264 papers: 240 positive, 24 negative or no effect

239 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

260 papers more in this group

See all 264 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.