Paper · 2022 · Sustainability

Influence of Different Rates and Frequencies of Zn Application to Maize–Wheat Cropping on Crop Productivity and Zn Use Efficiency

Dileep Kumar; Khusvadan C. Patel; Vinubhai P. Ramani; et al.

10
claims
12
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Nowadays, zinc (Zn) fertilizers are commonly used for quality food production globally. Knowledge about proper application time and rates of commercial Zn fertilizers is necessary to obtain higher crop production and improve Zn use efficiency. A long-term field experiment was conducted during 2012 to 2018 at Anand Agricultural University, Anand (Gujarat), India, to find out the right Zn fertilizer dose and its frequency of application in maize–wheat cropping systems grown on typic haplustepts soil. The study comprised of three frequency levels, i.e., Zn application in the first year only (F1), alternate year (F2), and every year (F3), with four different rates of Zn, i.e., 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, and 10.0 kg Zn ha−1 per year imposed in the maize–wheat cropping system in each kharif season (during June to September) for six years. Findings of the study revealed that Zn applications to maize at 7.5 and 10 kg ha−1 in alternate year and 5.0 to 10 kg ha−1 in every year significantly increased maize equivalent yield as compared to no-Zn treatment. Application of 10.0 kg Zn ha−1 per year produced higher grain size, straw, and total Zn concentrations compared to those observed under no-Zn application in maize and wheat crops. Diethylene triamine penta acetic acid extractable Zn concentration in soil was higher in Zn treated plots which received Zn application at 5.0, 7.5, and 10.0 kg ha−1 in alternate years and 10 kg ha−1 in every year as compared to no-Zn application. Apparent Zn recovery efficiency varied from 0.17 to 1.46% for maize crop and 0.34 to 1.70% for wheat crop under different rates and frequencies of Zn application. The above results emphasize the importance of Zn retention capacity of soil regarding its response to different rates and frequencies of Zn application to maize and wheat crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternate year maize zinc at 7.5 and 10 kg ha−1 raised maize equivalent yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
7.5 and 10 kg ha−1 in alternate yeare0
Outcome
maize equivalent yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
no-Zn treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zn applications to maize at 7.5 and 10 kg ha−1 in alternate year and 5.0 to 10 kg ha−1 in every year significantly increased maize equivalent yield as compared to no-Zn treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–1048 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual maize zinc at 5.0 to 10 kg ha−1 raised maize equivalent yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
5.0 to 10 kg ha−1 in every yeare0
Outcome
maize equivalent yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
no-Zn treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zn applications to maize at 7.5 and 10 kg ha−1 in alternate year and 5.0 to 10 kg ha−1 in every year significantly increased maize equivalent yield as compared to no-Zn treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–1048 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual 10 kg zinc increased maize grain size.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
10.0 kg Zn ha−1 per yeare0
Outcome
grain sizee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
no-Zn applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 10.0 kg Zn ha−1 per year produced higher grain size, straw, and total Zn concentrations compared to those observed under no-Zn application in maize and wheat crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual 10 kg zinc increased wheat grain size.

Treatment
10.0 kg Zn ha−1 per yeare0
Outcome
grain sizee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
no-Zn applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 10.0 kg Zn ha−1 per year produced higher grain size, straw, and total Zn concentrations compared to those observed under no-Zn application in maize and wheat crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual 10 kg zinc increased maize straw and total zinc concentrations.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
10.0 kg Zn ha−1 per yeare0
Outcome
straw, and total Zn concentrationse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
no-Zn applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 10.0 kg Zn ha−1 per year produced higher grain size, straw, and total Zn concentrations compared to those observed under no-Zn application in maize and wheat crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual 10 kg zinc increased wheat straw and total zinc concentrations.

Treatment
10.0 kg Zn ha−1 per yeare0
Outcome
straw, and total Zn concentrationse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
no-Zn applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 10.0 kg Zn ha−1 per year produced higher grain size, straw, and total Zn concentrations compared to those observed under no-Zn application in maize and wheat crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternate year zinc at three rates increased soil extractable zinc.

Taxon
maize–wheatTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Treatment
Zn application at 5.0, 7.5, and 10.0 kg ha−1 in alternate yearse0
Outcome
extractable Zn concentration in soile0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
no-Zn applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Diethylene triamine penta acetic acid extractable Zn concentration in soil was higher in Zn treated plots which received Zn application at 5.0, 7.5, and 10.0 kg ha−1 in alternate years and 10 kg ha−1 in every year as compared to no-Zn application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1476 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize–wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 66–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual zinc at 10 kg increased soil extractable zinc.

Taxon
maize–wheatTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Treatment
10 kg ha−1 in every yeare0
Outcome
extractable Zn concentration in soile0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
no-Zn applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Diethylene triamine penta acetic acid extractable Zn concentration in soil was higher in Zn treated plots which received Zn application at 5.0, 7.5, and 10.0 kg ha−1 in alternate years and 10 kg ha−1 in every year as compared to no-Zn application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1476 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize–wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 66–77 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apparent zinc recovery ranged from 0.17 to 1.46% for maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
Apparent Zn recovery efficiencye0
Value
0.17 to 1.46%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Apparent Zn recovery efficiency varied from 0.17 to 1.46% for maize crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1477–1549 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apparent zinc recovery ranged from 0.34 to 1.70% for wheat.

Outcome
Apparent Zn recovery efficiencye0
Value
0.34 to 1.70%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Apparent Zn recovery efficiency varied from 0.17 to 1.46% for maize crop and 0.34 to 1.70% for wheat crop under different rates and frequencies of Zn application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1477–1639 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

235 papers: 199 positive, 36 negative or no effect

198 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

231 papers more in this group

See all 235 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

441 papers: 391 positive, 50 negative or no effect

390 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

437 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.