Paper · 2025 · Agronomy

Effect of Zinc Application on Maize Dry Matter, Zinc Uptake, and Soil Microbial Community Grown Under Different Paddy Soil pH

Phanuphong Khongchiu; Jun Murase; Arunee Wongkaew; et al.

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Zinc (Zn) is often of deficient in paddy soils, and optimizing its application is crucial for improving maize productivity in intensive rice–maize cropping systems. This study aimed to develop practical Zn fertilizer strategies suitable for paddy soils with varying pH levels, thereby improving nutrient management and understanding of soil microbial responses. Field experiments were conducted during the 2020–2021 dry seasons at three sites: Chon Daen (pH 5.8), Noen Maprang (pH 6.7), and Lom Sak (pH 7.8). A two-factorial randomized complete block design with four replications was used, including four ZnSO4·H2O rates (0, 1.5, 3, and 6 times the DTPA-extractable Zn in soil) and two hybrid maize varieties, Suwan 5731 and Suwan 5819. Results showed that at Chon Daen, Zn application significantly enhanced shoot Zn uptake and soil Zn concentration, with SW5819 exhibiting greater Zn efficiency and biomass production. At Noen Maprang, Zn application did not significantly affect dry matter, while, at Lom Sak, Zn responses were moderate, though SW5819 maintained better growth and Zn uptake. Across sites, maize Zn efficiency was highest under acidic conditions and in SW5819. Soil microbial communities remained largely unaffected by Zn fertilization and were primarily influenced by soil pH, with Proteobacteria, Crenarchaeota, and Ascomycota dominating bacterial, archaeal, and fungal groups, respectively. These findings support the feasibility of Zn fertilization strategies to enhance both crop productivity and nutritional quality without altering the microbial community composition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At Chon Daen, Zn application significantly enhanced shoot Zn uptake and soil Zn concentration.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Zn applicatione1
Outcome
shoot Zn uptake and soil Zn concentratione1
Direction
significantly enhancede1
Setting
Chon Daene1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Zinc Application on Maize Dry Matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–46 · show in text ↑
e1

“at Chon Daen, Zn application significantly enhanced shoot Zn uptake and soil Zn concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–851 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Chon Daen, SW5819 showed greater Zn efficiency and biomass production.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Material
SW5819e2
Outcome
Zn efficiency and biomass productione2
Direction
greatere2
Setting
Chon Daene1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Zinc Application on Maize Dry Matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–46 · show in text ↑
e1

“at Chon Daen, Zn application significantly enhanced shoot Zn uptake and soil Zn concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–851 · show in text ↑
e2

“with SW5819 exhibiting greater Zn efficiency and biomass production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–920 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At Noen Maprang, Zn application did not significantly affect maize dry matter.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Zn applicatione3
Outcome
dry mattere3
Direction
did not significantly affecte3
Setting
Noen Maprange3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Zinc Application on Maize Dry Matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–46 · show in text ↑
e3

“At Noen Maprang, Zn application did not significantly affect dry matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–993 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Lom Sak, maize responses to Zn were moderate.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
Zn responsese4
Direction
moderatee4
Setting
Lom Sake4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Zinc Application on Maize Dry Matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–46 · show in text ↑
e4

“at Lom Sak, Zn responses were moderate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1040 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Lom Sak, SW5819 maintained better growth and Zn uptake.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Material
SW5819e5
Outcome
growth and Zn uptakee5
Direction
bettere5
Setting
Lom Sake4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Zinc Application on Maize Dry Matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–46 · show in text ↑
e4

“at Lom Sak, Zn responses were moderate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1040 · show in text ↑
e5

“though SW5819 maintained better growth and Zn uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1094 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across sites, maize Zn efficiency was highest under acidic conditions.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
acidic conditionse6
Outcome
Zn efficiencye6
Direction
higheste6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Zinc Application on Maize Dry Matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–46 · show in text ↑
e6

“Across sites, maize Zn efficiency was highest under acidic conditions and in SW5819”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1179 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across sites, maize Zn efficiency was highest in SW5819.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Material
SW5819e6
Outcome
Zn efficiencye6
Direction
higheste6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Zinc Application on Maize Dry Matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–46 · show in text ↑
e6

“Across sites, maize Zn efficiency was highest under acidic conditions and in SW5819”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil microbial communities remained largely unaffected by Zn fertilization.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Zn fertilizatione7
Outcome
Soil microbial communitiese7
Direction
remained largely unaffectede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Zinc Application on Maize Dry Matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–46 · show in text ↑
e7

“Soil microbial communities remained largely unaffected by Zn fertilization and were primarily influenced by soil pH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1296 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil microbial communities were primarily influenced by soil pH.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
soil pHe7
Outcome
Soil microbial communitiese7

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Zinc Application on Maize Dry Matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–46 · show in text ↑
e7

“Soil microbial communities remained largely unaffected by Zn fertilization and were primarily influenced by soil pH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1296 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proteobacteria, Crenarchaeota and Ascomycota dominated the bacterial, archaeal and fungal groups in the soil.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
bacterial, archaeal, and fungal groupse1
Qualifier
Proteobacteria, Crenarchaeota, and Ascomycotae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Zinc Application on Maize Dry Matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–46 · show in text ↑
e1

“Proteobacteria, Crenarchaeota, and Ascomycota dominating bacterial, archaeal, and fungal groups, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1412 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Zn fertilization strategies are feasible to enhance maize productivity and nutritional quality without altering microbial community composition.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Zn fertilization strategiese1
Outcome
crop productivity and nutritional qualitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Zinc Application on Maize Dry Matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–46 · show in text ↑
e1

“These findings support the feasibility of Zn fertilization strategies to enhance both crop productivity and nutritional quality without altering the microbial community composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1594 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

224 papers: 183 positive, 41 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 183 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

220 papers more in this group

See all 224 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

235 papers: 199 positive, 36 negative or no effect

198 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

231 papers more in this group

See all 235 papers →

zinc atom · soil: biology · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · soil: biology · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

90 papers: 73 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 73 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.