Paper · 2022 · Plants

Stimulating the Growth, Anabolism, Antioxidants, and Yield of Rice Plants Grown under Salt Stress by Combined Application of Bacterial Inoculants and Nano-Silicon

Khadiga Alharbi; Hany S. Osman; Emadeldeen Rashwan; et al.

11
claims
25
verbatim quotes
33
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The growth and development of rice face many issues, including its exposure to high soil salinity. This issue can be alleviated using new approaches to overwhelm the factors that restrict rice productivity. The objective of our investigation was the usage of the rhizobacteria (Pseudomonas koreensis and Bacillus coagulans) as plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs) and nano-silicon, which could be a positive technology to cope with the problems raised by soil salinity in addition to improvement the morpho-physiological properties, and productivity of two rice varieties (i.e., Giza 177 as salt-sensitive and Giza 179 as salt-tolerant). The findings stated that the application of combined PGPRs and nano-Si resulted in the highest soil enzymes activity (dehydrogenase and urease), root length, leaf area index, photosynthesis pigments, K+ ions, relative water content (RWC), and stomatal conductance (gs) while resulted in the reduction of Na+, electrolyte leakage (EL), and proline content. All these improvements are due to increased antioxidant enzymes activity such as catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and peroxidase (POD), which decreased hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and malondialdehyde (MDA) under soil salinity in rice plants compared to the other treatments. Combined application of PGPRs and nano-Si to Giza 177 significantly surpassed Giza 179, which was neither treated with PGPR nor nano-Si in the main yield components (number of grains/panicles, 1000 grain weight, and grain yield as well as nutrient uptake. In conclusion, both PGPRs and nano-Si had stimulating effects that mitigated the salinity-deleterious effects and encouraged plant growth, and, therefore, enhanced the grain yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined PGPRs and nano-Si produced the highest soil dehydrogenase and urease activities.

Taxon
Rice PlantsOryza sativat0
Treatment
combined PGPRs and nano-Sie0
Outcome
soil enzymes activity (dehydrogenase and urease)e0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of combined PGPRs and nano-Si resulted in the highest soil enzymes activity (dehydrogenase and urease)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–789 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined PGPRs and nano-Si produced the highest root length and leaf area index.

Taxon
Rice PlantsOryza sativat0
Treatment
combined PGPRs and nano-Sie0
Outcome
root length, leaf area indexe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of combined PGPRs and nano-Si resulted in the highest soil enzymes activity (dehydrogenase and urease), root length, leaf area index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–819 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined PGPRs and nano-Si produced the highest photosynthesis pigment levels and K+ ions.

Taxon
Rice PlantsOryza sativat0
Treatment
combined PGPRs and nano-Sie0
Outcome
photosynthesis pigments, K+ ionse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of combined PGPRs and nano-Si resulted in the highest soil enzymes activity (dehydrogenase and urease), root length, leaf area index, photosynthesis pigments, K+ ions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–853 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined PGPRs and nano-Si produced the highest relative water content and stomatal conductance.

Taxon
Rice PlantsOryza sativat0
Treatment
combined PGPRs and nano-Sie1
Outcome
relative water content (RWC), and stomatal conductance (gs)e0
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“relative water content (RWC), and stomatal conductance (gs)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–914 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“the application of combined PGPRs and nano-Si resulted in the highest soil enzymes activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–762 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined PGPRs and nano-Si reduced Na+, electrolyte leakage, and proline content.

Taxon
Rice PlantsOryza sativat0
Treatment
combined PGPRs and nano-Sie1
Outcome
Na+, electrolyte leakage (EL), and proline contente0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resulted in the reduction of Na+, electrolyte leakage (EL), and proline content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1001 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“the application of combined PGPRs and nano-Si”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–716 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antioxidant enzyme activities of CAT, SOD, and POD increased under the combined treatment.

Taxon
Rice PlantsOryza sativat0
Treatment
combined PGPRs and nano-Sie1
Gene
catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and peroxidase (POD)e0
Outcome
antioxidant enzymes activitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased antioxidant enzymes activity such as catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and peroxidase (POD)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1147 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“combined PGPRs and nano-Si”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–716 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher antioxidant activity decreased hydrogen peroxide and malondialdehyde under rice salinity.

Taxon
rice plantsOryza sativae0
Gene
antioxidant enzymes activitye1
Outcome
hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and malondialdehyde (MDA)e0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
under soil salinitye0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which decreased hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and malondialdehyde (MDA) under soil salinity in rice plants compared to the other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1284 · show in text ↑
e1

“increased antioxidant enzymes activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1074 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined PGPRs and nano-Si significantly raised grain number per panicle in Giza 177 compared with untreated Giza 179.

Taxon
Rice PlantsOryza sativat0
Material
Giza 177e0
Treatment
Combined application of PGPRs and nano-Sie0
Outcome
number of grains/paniclese0
Direction
surpassede0
Comparator
Giza 179e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined application of PGPRs and nano-Si to Giza 177 significantly surpassed Giza 179, which was neither treated with PGPR nor nano-Si in the main yield components (number of grains/panicles, 1000 grain weight, and grain yield as well as nutrient uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1540 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined PGPRs and nano-Si significantly raised 1000 grain weight in Giza 177 compared with untreated Giza 179.

Taxon
Rice PlantsOryza sativat0
Material
Giza 177e0
Treatment
Combined application of PGPRs and nano-Sie0
Outcome
1000 grain weighte0
Direction
surpassede0
Comparator
Giza 179e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined application of PGPRs and nano-Si to Giza 177 significantly surpassed Giza 179, which was neither treated with PGPR nor nano-Si in the main yield components (number of grains/panicles, 1000 grain weight, and grain yield as well as nutrient uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1540 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined PGPRs and nano-Si significantly raised grain yield in Giza 177 compared with untreated Giza 179.

Taxon
Rice PlantsOryza sativat0
Material
Giza 177e0
Treatment
Combined application of PGPRs and nano-Sie0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
surpassede0
Comparator
Giza 179e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined application of PGPRs and nano-Si to Giza 177 significantly surpassed Giza 179, which was neither treated with PGPR nor nano-Si in the main yield components (number of grains/panicles, 1000 grain weight, and grain yield as well as nutrient uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1540 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined PGPRs and nano-Si significantly raised nutrient uptake in Giza 177 compared with untreated Giza 179.

Taxon
Rice PlantsOryza sativat0
Material
Giza 177e0
Treatment
Combined application of PGPRs and nano-Sie0
Outcome
nutrient uptakee0
Direction
surpassede0
Comparator
Giza 179e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined application of PGPRs and nano-Si to Giza 177 significantly surpassed Giza 179, which was neither treated with PGPR nor nano-Si in the main yield components (number of grains/panicles, 1000 grain weight, and grain yield as well as nutrient uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1540 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–73 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 25 positive, 1 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: oxidative · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 24 positive, 5 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: photosynthesis · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 28 positive, 3 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

nanoparticle · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

80 papers: 76 positive, 4 negative or no effect

75 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

76 papers more in this group

See all 80 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 132 positive, 12 negative or no effect

131 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

140 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

202 papers: 189 positive, 13 negative or no effect

188 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

198 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: enzyme activity · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.