Abstract
The present study was carried out during two consecutive Kharif, seasons of 2020 & 2021 at Instructional Farm, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture & Technology, Udaipur, Rajasthan to assess the response of maize crop under foliar application of zinc based nanofertilizer and varying fertility levels on quality, yield and economics in Southern Rajasthan. The experiment was laid out in a factorial randomized design with three replications comprising four foliar application of nanofertilizer (Control, at knee high stage, at 50% tasseling stage and both at knee high stage and at 50% tasseling stage) and four fertility levels (100% RDF, 90% RDF, 80% RDF and control). Significantly highest protein content of maize (11.13 % and 10.97 %) was found in with dual foliar application of nanofertilizer and 90 per cent RDF, respectively. The significantly highest net return and B:C ratio were found under dual foliar application of nanofertilizer 82956 and 3.04) and soil application of 90 per cent RDF (Rs. 86112 and 3.15) in tested maize crop.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Dual nanofertilizer application gave the highest maize protein content of 11.13%.
- Treatment
- dual foliar application of nanofertilizere0
- Outcome
- protein contente0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 11.13 %e0
Zea maysNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Significantly highest protein content of maize (11.13 % and 10.97 %) was found in with dual foliar application of nanofertilizer and 90 per cent RDF, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
At 90 per cent RDF maize protein content was 10.97%.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Significantly highest protein content of maize (11.13 % and 10.97 %) was found in with dual foliar application of nanofertilizer and 90 per cent RDF, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Dual nanofertilizer application produced the highest net return of 82956.
- Treatment
- dual foliar application of nanofertilizere0
- Outcome
- net returne0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 82956e0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“The significantly highest net return and B:C ratio were found under dual foliar application of nanofertilizer 82956 and 3.04)”
Claim · model-written summary
Dual nanofertilizer application produced the highest B:C ratio of 3.04.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“The significantly highest net return and B:C ratio were found under dual foliar application of nanofertilizer 82956 and 3.04)”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil application of 90 per cent RDF yielded the highest net return of Rs. 86112.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“soil application of 90 per cent RDF (Rs. 86112 and 3.15) in tested maize crop”
e1“The significantly highest net return and B:C ratio were found under dual foliar application of nanofertilizer 82956 and 3.04)”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil application of 90 per cent RDF yielded a B:C ratio of 3.15.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“soil application of 90 per cent RDF (Rs. 86112 and 3.15) in tested maize crop”
e1“The significantly highest net return and B:C ratio were found under dual foliar application of nanofertilizer 82956 and 3.04)”
The same questions in other papers
application · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
58 papers more in this group
See all 62 papers →nanoparticle · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
214 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
229 papers more in this group
See all 233 papers →fertilization · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
235 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
258 papers more in this group
See all 262 papers →application · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
574 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- no effect
625 papers more in this group
See all 629 papers →fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
3,904 papers more in this group
See all 3,908 papers →nanoparticle · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
12 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.