Paper · 2022 · Annals of Plant and Soil Research

Growth analysis and grain yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties under green manure based integrated nutrient management

STUTI DEBAPRIYA BEHERA

14
claims
26
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted at Bhubaneswar, Odisha during kharif seasons of 2018 and 2019 to study the growth behavior of rice varieties under nutrient management practices. Six treatment combinations comprising of three nutrient management (100% Soil Test Based Nitrogen Recommendation (STBNR), 75% STBNR + in situ green manuring (dhaincha) and 50% STBNR + in situ green manuring of dhaincha) and two rice varieties (Manaswinee of 125d duration and Hasanta of 145d duration) were tried in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with four replications. The results showed that crop growth rate (CGR) was significantly influenced by both nutrient management practices and varieties. Pooled over the years, application of 75% STBNR + green manuring of dhaincha exhibited the maximum CGR of 11.33 and 20.80 g/m2/day during 30-60 and 60-90 DAT, respectively and which were superior to 100% STBNR and 50% STBNR + green manuring of dhaincha. Similarly, rice cv. ‘Hasanta’ recorded CGR of 10.98 and 20.42 g/m2/day during 30-60 and 60-90 DAT, respectively, which were higher over cv. ‘Manaswinee’. The maximum relative growth rate (RGR) of 23.77 mg/g/day was registered with 50% STBNR + green manuring of dhaincha, being at par with 75% STBNR + green manuring of dhaincha during 60-90 DAT. Application of 75% STBNR + green manuring of dhaincha recorded the maximum Net assimilation rate (NAR) of 3.41 and 4.26 g/m2 leaf area/day during 30-60 and 60-90 DAT, respectively. Both cultivars were equally effective for RGR and NAR. The treatment trend for physiological indices led to higher grain yield under 75% STBNR + green manuring of dhaincha among nutrient management practices and cv. ‘Hasanta’ between rice varieties. Grain yield and the three physiological indices were positively correlated, but the correlation coefficient values were significant for CGR and NAR.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient management and variety significantly affected crop growth rate.

Treatment
nutrient management practicese0
Outcome
crop growth rate (CGR)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that crop growth rate (CGR) was significantly influenced by both nutrient management practices and varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–687 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% STBNR plus dhaincha treatment maximized CGR at 11.33 g/m2/day during 30-60 DAT.

Treatment
75% STBNR + green manuring of dhainchae0
Outcome
CGRe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
11.33e0
Qualifier
30-60e0
Comparator
100% STBNRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pooled over the years, application of 75% STBNR + green manuring of dhaincha exhibited the maximum CGR of 11.33 and 20.80 g/m2/day during 30-60 and 60-90 DAT, respectively and which were superior to 100% STBNR and 50% STBNR + green manuring of dhaincha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–941 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% STBNR plus dhaincha treatment maximized CGR at 20.80 g/m2/day during 60-90 DAT.

Treatment
75% STBNR + green manuring of dhainchae0
Outcome
CGRe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
20.80 g/m2/daye0
Qualifier
60-90 DATe0
Comparator
50% STBNR + green manuring of dhainchae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pooled over the years, application of 75% STBNR + green manuring of dhaincha exhibited the maximum CGR of 11.33 and 20.80 g/m2/day during 30-60 and 60-90 DAT, respectively and which were superior to 100% STBNR and 50% STBNR + green manuring of dhaincha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–941 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–57 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hasanta CGR was 10.98 g/m2/day during 30-60 DAT, above Manaswinee.

Material
Hasantae0
Outcome
CGRe0
Direction
highere0
Value
10.98e0
Qualifier
30-60e0
Comparator
Manaswineee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly, rice cv. ‘Hasanta’ recorded CGR of 10.98 and 20.42 g/m2/day during 30-60 and 60-90 DAT, respectively, which were higher over cv. ‘Manaswinee’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1095 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hasanta CGR was 20.42 g/m2/day during 60-90 DAT, above Manaswinee.

Material
Hasantae0
Outcome
CGRe0
Direction
highere0
Value
20.42 g/m2/daye0
Qualifier
60-90 DATe0
Comparator
Manaswineee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly, rice cv. ‘Hasanta’ recorded CGR of 10.98 and 20.42 g/m2/day during 30-60 and 60-90 DAT, respectively, which were higher over cv. ‘Manaswinee’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1095 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

50% STBNR plus dhaincha yielded maximum RGR of 23.77 mg/g/day at 60-90 DAT.

Treatment
50% STBNR + green manuring of dhainchae0
Outcome
relative growth rate (RGR)e0
Direction
maximume0
Value
23.77 mg/g/daye0
Qualifier
60-90 DATe0
Comparator
75% STBNR + green manuring of dhainchae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum relative growth rate (RGR) of 23.77 mg/g/day was registered with 50% STBNR + green manuring of dhaincha, being at par with 75% STBNR + green manuring of dhaincha during 60-90 DAT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1287 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

75% STBNR plus dhaincha gave maximum NAR of 3.41 g/m2 leaf area/day at 30-60 DAT.

Treatment
75% STBNR + green manuring of dhainchae0
Outcome
Net assimilation rate (NAR)e0
Direction
maximume0
Value
3.41e0
Qualifier
30-60e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 75% STBNR + green manuring of dhaincha recorded the maximum Net assimilation rate (NAR) of 3.41 and 4.26 g/m2 leaf area/day during 30-60 and 60-90 DAT, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1468 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

75% STBNR plus dhaincha gave maximum NAR of 4.26 g/m2 leaf area/day at 60-90 DAT.

Treatment
75% STBNR + green manuring of dhainchae0
Outcome
Net assimilation rate (NAR)e0
Direction
maximume0
Value
4.26 g/m2 leaf area/daye0
Qualifier
60-90 DATe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 75% STBNR + green manuring of dhaincha recorded the maximum Net assimilation rate (NAR) of 3.41 and 4.26 g/m2 leaf area/day during 30-60 and 60-90 DAT, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1468 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–57 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cultivars were equally effective for RGR and NAR.

Material
Both cultivarse0
Outcome
RGR and NARe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both cultivars were equally effective for RGR and NAR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1469–1523 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

75% STBNR plus dhaincha produced higher grain yield among nutrient practices.

Treatment
75% STBNR + green manuring of dhainchae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
nutrient management practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment trend for physiological indices led to higher grain yield under 75% STBNR + green manuring of dhaincha among nutrient management practices and cv. ‘Hasanta’ between rice varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1524–1718 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–57 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hasanta produced higher grain yield than other rice varieties.

Material
Hasantae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
rice varietiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment trend for physiological indices led to higher grain yield under 75% STBNR + green manuring of dhaincha among nutrient management practices and cv. ‘Hasanta’ between rice varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1524–1718 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield correlated positively with CGR, significantly.

Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
positively correlatede0
Comparator
CGRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield and the three physiological indices were positively correlated, but the correlation coefficient values were significant for CGR and NAR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1719–1867 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–57 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield correlated positively with NAR, significantly.

Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
positively correlatede0
Comparator
NARe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield and the three physiological indices were positively correlated, but the correlation coefficient values were significant for CGR and NAR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1719–1867 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–57 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield correlated positively with RGR, without stated significance.

Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
positively correlatede0
Comparator
RGRe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield and the three physiological indices were positively correlated, but the correlation coefficient values were significant for CGR and NAR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1719–1867 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“relative growth rate (RGR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1134 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

511 papers: 402 positive, 109 negative or no effect

401 papers in the same direction as this paper · 101 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

fertilization · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

759 papers: 670 positive, 89 negative or no effect

669 papers in the same direction as this paper · 81 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

755 papers more in this group

See all 759 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.