Paper · 2023 · Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research

Effect of Nitrogen and Water Use on Yield And Storability of Onion

MN Yousuf; MM Ahmmed; S Brahma; et al.

10
claims
28
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A Field experiment was conducted at Regional Spices Research Centre, BARI, Gazipur and Spices Research Sub-Centre, BARI, Lalmonirhat to find out the water and nitrogen use efficiency of onion (Allium cepa L.) as influence by different levels of soil moisture regimes and nitrogen doses during rabi season of 2020-2021. The experiment was designed in Factorial Randomized Complete Block Design having three replications. The treatment composed of three soil moisture regiems (10%, 20% and 30% depletion of soil moisture over field capacity) and three nitrogen doses (150, 100 and 75 kg ha-1). The individual as well as interaction effect of soil moisture and nitrogen levels showed significant effect on yield and yield contributing parameters, storability, nitrogen and water use efficiency except the TSS of onion. The highest bulb yield (21.49 t ha-1 in Gazipur & 22.79 t ha-1 in Lalmonirhat), marketable bulb yield (18.0 t ha-1 in Gazipur & 20.0 t ha-1 in Lalmonirhat), harvest index (598.0% in Gazipur & 607.9% in Lalmonirhat) were recorded when the crop irrigated at 10% depletion of field capacity and plant supplied with 100kg Nha-1. Similarly, the maximum nitrogen use efficiency (54.74% in Gazipur & 61.38% in Lalmonirhat) and the maximum water use efficiency (105.76 kg ha-1 mm-1 in Gazipur & 108.06 kg ha-1 mm-1 in Lalmonirhat) were also observed from the above mentioned treatment combinations. Total PLW was higher (16.3% in Gazipur and 21.1% in Lalmonirhat) with irrigation was given applied at 10% depletion of field capacity and application of 150 kg N ha-1 during 120 days of storage. Bangladesh J. Agril. Res. 47(1): 119-142, March 2022

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 10% depletion of field capacity with 100 kg N ha-1 gave the highest bulb yield of onion.

Taxon
Allium cepaAllium cepae2
Treatment
irrigated at 10% depletion of field capacity and plant supplied with 100kg Nha-1e3
Outcome
bulb yielde4
Direction
higheste4
Value
21.49 t ha-1 in Gazipur & 22.79 t ha-1 in Lalmonirhate4
Setting
Field experimente1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A Field experiment was conducted at Regional Spices Research Centre, BARI, Gazipur and Spices Research Sub-Centre, BARI, Lalmonirhat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–132 · show in text ↑
e2

“water and nitrogen use efficiency of onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–208 · show in text ↑
e3

“were recorded when the crop irrigated at 10% depletion of field capacity and plant supplied with 100kg Nha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1139 · show in text ↑
e4

“The highest bulb yield (21.49 t ha-1 in Gazipur & 22.79 t ha-1 in Lalmonirhat)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 10% depletion of field capacity with 100 kg N ha-1 gave higher marketable bulb yield of onion.

Taxon
Allium cepaAllium cepae2
Treatment
irrigated at 10% depletion of field capacity and plant supplied with 100kg Nha-1e3
Outcome
marketable bulb yielde5
Direction
higherinferrede5
Value
18.0 t ha-1 in Gazipur & 20.0 t ha-1 in Lalmonirhate5
Setting
Field experimente1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A Field experiment was conducted at Regional Spices Research Centre, BARI, Gazipur and Spices Research Sub-Centre, BARI, Lalmonirhat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–132 · show in text ↑
e2

“water and nitrogen use efficiency of onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–208 · show in text ↑
e3

“were recorded when the crop irrigated at 10% depletion of field capacity and plant supplied with 100kg Nha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1139 · show in text ↑
e5

“marketable bulb yield (18.0 t ha-1 in Gazipur & 20.0 t ha-1 in Lalmonirhat)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–971 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 10% depletion of field capacity with 100 kg N ha-1 gave higher harvest index of onion.

Taxon
Allium cepaAllium cepae2
Treatment
irrigated at 10% depletion of field capacity and plant supplied with 100kg Nha-1e3
Outcome
harvest indexe6
Direction
higherinferrede6
Value
598.0% in Gazipur & 607.9% in Lalmonirhate6
Setting
Field experimente1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A Field experiment was conducted at Regional Spices Research Centre, BARI, Gazipur and Spices Research Sub-Centre, BARI, Lalmonirhat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–132 · show in text ↑
e2

“water and nitrogen use efficiency of onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–208 · show in text ↑
e3

“were recorded when the crop irrigated at 10% depletion of field capacity and plant supplied with 100kg Nha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1139 · show in text ↑
e6

“harvest index (598.0% in Gazipur & 607.9% in Lalmonirhat)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1030 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 10% depletion of field capacity with 100 kg N ha-1 gave the maximum nitrogen use efficiency of onion.

Taxon
Allium cepaAllium cepae2
Treatment
irrigated at 10% depletion of field capacity and plant supplied with 100kg Nha-1e3
Outcome
maximum nitrogen use efficiencye7
Direction
maximume7
Value
54.74% in Gazipur & 61.38% in Lalmonirhate7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“water and nitrogen use efficiency of onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–208 · show in text ↑
e3

“were recorded when the crop irrigated at 10% depletion of field capacity and plant supplied with 100kg Nha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1139 · show in text ↑
e7

“the maximum nitrogen use efficiency (54.74% in Gazipur & 61.38% in Lalmonirhat)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1231 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 10% depletion of field capacity with 100 kg N ha-1 gave the maximum water use efficiency of onion.

Taxon
Allium cepaAllium cepae2
Treatment
irrigated at 10% depletion of field capacity and plant supplied with 100kg Nha-1e3
Outcome
maximum water use efficiencye0
Direction
maximume0
Value
105.76 kg ha-1 mm-1 in Gazipur & 108.06 kg ha-1 mm-1 in Lalmonirhate0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“water and nitrogen use efficiency of onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–208 · show in text ↑
e3

“were recorded when the crop irrigated at 10% depletion of field capacity and plant supplied with 100kg Nha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1139 · show in text ↑
e0

“the maximum water use efficiency (105.76 kg ha-1 mm-1 in Gazipur & 108.06 kg ha-1 mm-1 in Lalmonirhat)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1338 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil moisture regime and nitrogen dose had a significant effect on onion yield and yield-contributing parameters.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae7
Treatment
soil moisture regimes and nitrogen dosese6
Outcome
yield and yield contributing parameterse7

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“different levels of soil moisture regimes and nitrogen doses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–285 · show in text ↑
e7

“The individual as well as interaction effect of soil moisture and nitrogen levels showed significant effect on yield and yield contributing parameters, storability, nitrogen and water use efficiency except the TSS of onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil moisture regime and nitrogen dose had a significant effect on onion storability.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae7
Treatment
soil moisture regimes and nitrogen dosese6
Outcome
storabilitye7

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“different levels of soil moisture regimes and nitrogen doses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–285 · show in text ↑
e7

“The individual as well as interaction effect of soil moisture and nitrogen levels showed significant effect on yield and yield contributing parameters, storability, nitrogen and water use efficiency except the TSS of onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil moisture regime and nitrogen dose had a significant effect on onion nitrogen and water use efficiency.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae7
Treatment
soil moisture regimes and nitrogen dosese6
Outcome
nitrogen and water use efficiencye7

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“different levels of soil moisture regimes and nitrogen doses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–285 · show in text ↑
e7

“The individual as well as interaction effect of soil moisture and nitrogen levels showed significant effect on yield and yield contributing parameters, storability, nitrogen and water use efficiency except the TSS of onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil moisture regime and nitrogen dose had no significant effect on onion TSS.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae7
Treatment
soil moisture regimes and nitrogen dosese6
Outcome
TSSe7

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“different levels of soil moisture regimes and nitrogen doses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–285 · show in text ↑
e7

“The individual as well as interaction effect of soil moisture and nitrogen levels showed significant effect on yield and yield contributing parameters, storability, nitrogen and water use efficiency except the TSS of onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 10% depletion of field capacity with 150 kg N ha-1 gave higher total postharvest liquid weight loss (PLW) of onion over 120 days of storage.

Taxon
Allium cepaAllium cepae2
Treatment
irrigation was given applied at 10% depletion of field capacity and application of 150 kg N ha-1e5
Outcome
Total PLWe5
Direction
highere5
Value
16.3% in Gazipur and 21.1% in Lalmonirhate5
Qualifier
during 120 days of storagee5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“water and nitrogen use efficiency of onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–208 · show in text ↑
e5

“Total PLW was higher (16.3% in Gazipur and 21.1% in Lalmonirhat) with irrigation was given applied at 10% depletion of field capacity and application of 150 kg N ha-1 during 120 days of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1407–1600 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

irrigation · quality: postharvest · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 25 positive, 9 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

nitrogen · quality: postharvest · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 36 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 47 positive, 2 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

irrigation · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

133 papers: 106 positive, 27 negative or no effect

105 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

129 papers more in this group

See all 133 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: efficiency · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.