Paper · 2022 · CLSU International Journal of Science and Technology

The Effect of Molasses and Probiotic as Additive on the Physical Quality, Chemical and Microbial Composition of Napier Silages

Princess Eslabra; Perla Florendo; Monina Andialan; et al.

8
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The effect of molasses and probiotic on physical quality, chemical and microbial composition of 40 days ensilage of Napier variety, Pakchong 1 was evaluated using wilted Napier grass with 10% molasses as silage additive and a combination of 5%, 10%, and 15% molasses with 1% probiotic/kg DM. Physical quality of silages showed similarities in color, smell texture, and acidity while viable concentrations of lactic acid bacteria did not vary significantly (p>0.05) among treatments. The concentrations of lactic acid and acetic acid were significantly higher (p<0.05) in silage using molasses alone as additive compared to different levels of additive molasses with probiotics. On the other hand, proximate chemical composition of dry matter, crude protein, crude fat, and crude ash did not differ significantly (P>0.05) among treatments. Species of Lactobacillus and Streptococcus were isolated from Pakchong 1 and from the probiotic used in this study. In conclusion, physical, chemical, and microbial composition of Napier silages can be influenced by the type of additives used. In particular, molasses was observed to be a potential source of soluble carbohydrates needed by natural lactic acid bacteria in Napier. Likewise, probiotic produces high concentrations of lactic acids with subsequent preservation of the silage at a given duration of ensiling.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Physical quality of Napier silages was similar across molasses and probiotic additive treatments in color, smell, texture and acidity.

Taxon
Napier grassCenchrus purpureuse1
Treatment
molasses and probiotice0
Outcome
Physical quality of silagese3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus purpureus
Cenchrus purpureus · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of molasses and probiotic on physical quality, chemical and microbial composition of 40 days ensilage of Napier variety, Pakchong 1 was evaluated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–156 · show in text ↑
e1

“using wilted Napier grass with 10% molasses as silage additive and a combination of 5%, 10%, and 15% molasses with 1% probiotic/kg DM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–290 · show in text ↑
e3

“Physical quality of silages showed similarities in color, smell texture, and acidity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–376 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Viable lactic acid bacteria concentrations did not vary significantly among silage treatments.

Taxon
Napier grassCenchrus purpureuse1
Treatment
molasses and probiotice0
Outcome
viable concentrations of lactic acid bacteriae2
Direction
did not varye2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus purpureus
Cenchrus purpureus · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of molasses and probiotic on physical quality, chemical and microbial composition of 40 days ensilage of Napier variety, Pakchong 1 was evaluated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–156 · show in text ↑
e1

“using wilted Napier grass with 10% molasses as silage additive and a combination of 5%, 10%, and 15% molasses with 1% probiotic/kg DM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–290 · show in text ↑
e2

“viable concentrations of lactic acid bacteria did not vary significantly (p>0.05) among treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–481 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silage with molasses alone had significantly higher lactic and acetic acid concentrations than silage with molasses and probiotics.

Taxon
Napier grassCenchrus purpureuse1
Treatment
molasses alone as additivee4
Outcome
concentrations of lactic acid and acetic acide4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
different levels of additive molasses with probioticse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus purpureus
Cenchrus purpureus · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“using wilted Napier grass with 10% molasses as silage additive and a combination of 5%, 10%, and 15% molasses with 1% probiotic/kg DM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–290 · show in text ↑
e4

“The concentrations of lactic acid and acetic acid were significantly higher (p<0.05) in silage using molasses alone as additive compared to different levels of additive molasses with probiotics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–676 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter, crude protein and crude fat did not differ significantly among Napier silage treatments.

Taxon
Napier grassCenchrus purpureuse1
Treatment
molasses and probiotice0
Outcome
dry matter, crude protein, crude fate5
Direction
did not differe5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus purpureus
Cenchrus purpureus · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of molasses and probiotic on physical quality, chemical and microbial composition of 40 days ensilage of Napier variety, Pakchong 1 was evaluated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–156 · show in text ↑
e1

“using wilted Napier grass with 10% molasses as silage additive and a combination of 5%, 10%, and 15% molasses with 1% probiotic/kg DM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–290 · show in text ↑
e5

“proximate chemical composition of dry matter, crude protein, crude fat, and crude ash did not differ significantly (P>0.05) among treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–837 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude ash did not differ significantly among Napier silage treatments.

Taxon
Napier grassCenchrus purpureuse1
Treatment
molasses and probiotice0
Outcome
crude ashe5
Direction
did not differe5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus purpureus
Cenchrus purpureus · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of molasses and probiotic on physical quality, chemical and microbial composition of 40 days ensilage of Napier variety, Pakchong 1 was evaluated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–156 · show in text ↑
e1

“using wilted Napier grass with 10% molasses as silage additive and a combination of 5%, 10%, and 15% molasses with 1% probiotic/kg DM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–290 · show in text ↑
e5

“proximate chemical composition of dry matter, crude protein, crude fat, and crude ash did not differ significantly (P>0.05) among treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–837 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Species of Lactobacillus and Streptococcus were isolated from Pakchong 1 Napier and the probiotic.

Taxon
Napier grassCenchrus purpureuse1
Material
Pakchong 1e6
Outcome
Species of Lactobacillus and Streptococcuse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus purpureus
Cenchrus purpureus · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“using wilted Napier grass with 10% molasses as silage additive and a combination of 5%, 10%, and 15% molasses with 1% probiotic/kg DM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–290 · show in text ↑
e6

“Species of Lactobacillus and Streptococcus were isolated from Pakchong 1 and from the probiotic used in this study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–953 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Molasses was observed to be a potential source of soluble carbohydrates for natural lactic acid bacteria in Napier.

Taxon
Napiere7
Treatment
molassese7
Compound
soluble carbohydratese7
Outcome
potential source of soluble carbohydratese7

Verbatim

e7

“molasses was observed to be a potential source of soluble carbohydrates needed by natural lactic acid bacteria in Napier”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1218 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Probiotic produced high concentrations of lactic acids, preserving the silage over the ensiling period.

Taxon
Napier grassCenchrus purpureuse1
Treatment
probiotice2
Outcome
concentrations of lactic acidse2
Direction
highe2
Qualifier
at a given duration of ensilinge2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus purpureus
Cenchrus purpureus · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“using wilted Napier grass with 10% molasses as silage additive and a combination of 5%, 10%, and 15% molasses with 1% probiotic/kg DM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–290 · show in text ↑
e2

“probiotic produces high concentrations of lactic acids with subsequent preservation of the silage at a given duration of ensiling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1359 · show in text ↑

molasses · quality: protein · Cenchrus purpureus (elephant grass)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

molasses · quality: grain · Cenchrus purpureus (elephant grass)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

molasses · quality: general · Cenchrus purpureus (elephant grass)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

molasses · molecular: metabolites · Cenchrus purpureus (elephant grass)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.