Paper · 2023 · Journal of Integrative Agriculture

Identifying the critical phosphorus balance for optimizing phosphorus input and regulating soil phosphorus effectiveness in a typical winter wheat–summer maize rotation system in North China

Meng-ze XU; Yu-hong WANG; Cai-e NIE; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
17
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Phosphorus (P) is a nonrenewable resource and a critical element for plant growth that plays an important role in improving crop yield. Excessive P fertilizer application is widespread in agricultural production, which not only wastes phosphate resources but also causes P accumulation and groundwater pollution. Here, we hypothesized that the apparent P balance of a crop system could be used as an indicator for identifying the critical P input in order to obtain a high yield with high phosphorus use efficiency (PUE). A 12-year field experiment with P fertilization rates of 0, 45, 90, 135, 180, and 225 kg P2O5 ha-1 was conducted to determine the crop yield, PUE, and soil Olsen-P value response to P balance, and to optimize the P input. Annual yield stagnation occurred when the P fertilizer application exceeded a certain level, and high yield and PUE levels were achieved with annual P fertilizer application rates of 90-135 kg P2O5 ha-1. A critical P balance range of 2.15-4.45 kg P ha-1 was recommended to achieve optimum yield with minimal environmental risk. The critical P input range estimated from the P balance was 95.7-101 kg P2O5 ha-1, which improved yield and PUE (90.0-94.9%). In addition, the P input-output balance helps in assessing future changes in Olsen-P values, which increased by 4.07 mg kg-1 of P for every 100 kg of P surplus. Overall, the P balance can be used as a critical indicator for P management in agriculture, providing a robust reference for limiting P excess and developing a more productive, efficient and environmentally friendly P fertilizer management strategy.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual yield plateaued above a phosphorus fertilizer threshold.

Taxon
winter wheat–summer maizeTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Treatment
P fertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
Annual yielde0
Direction
stagnatione0
Qualifier
exceeded a certain levele0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Annual yield stagnation occurred when the P fertilizer application exceeded a certain level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–835 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat–summer maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual P rates of 90-135 kg P2O5 ha-1 achieved high yield.

Taxon
winter wheat–summer maizeTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Treatment
annual P fertilizer application rates of 90-135 kg P2O5 ha-1e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high yield and PUE levels were achieved with annual P fertilizer application rates of 90-135 kg P2O5 ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–946 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat–summer maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual P rates of 90-135 kg P2O5 ha-1 achieved high PUE.

Taxon
winter wheat–summer maizeTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Treatment
annual P fertilizer application rates of 90-135 kg P2O5 ha-1e0
Outcome
PUE levelse0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high yield and PUE levels were achieved with annual P fertilizer application rates of 90-135 kg P2O5 ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–946 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat–summer maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–159 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommended P balance of 2.15-4.45 kg P ha-1 for optimal yield with minimal environmental risk.

Taxon
winter wheat–summer maizeTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Outcome
critical P balance rangee0
Value
2.15-4.45 kg P ha-1e0
Qualifier
optimum yield with minimal environmental riske0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A critical P balance range of 2.15-4.45 kg P ha-1 was recommended to achieve optimum yield with minimal environmental risk.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1071 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat–summer maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–159 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P balance estimated critical P input at 95.7-101 kg P2O5 ha-1.

Taxon
winter wheat–summer maizeTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Outcome
critical P input rangee0
Value
95.7-101 kg P2O5 ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The critical P input range estimated from the P balance was 95.7-101 kg P2O5 ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1153 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat–summer maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Critical P input improved yield.

Taxon
winter wheat–summer maizeTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Treatment
critical P input rangee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The critical P input range estimated from the P balance was 95.7-101 kg P2O5 ha-1, which improved yield and PUE (90.0-94.9%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1197 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat–summer maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Critical P input improved PUE to 90.0-94.9%.

Taxon
winter wheat–summer maizeTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Treatment
critical P input rangee0
Outcome
PUEe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
90.0-94.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The critical P input range estimated from the P balance was 95.7-101 kg P2O5 ha-1, which improved yield and PUE (90.0-94.9%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1197 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat–summer maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–159 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil Olsen-P increased 4.07 mg kg-1 per 100 kg P surplus.

Taxon
winter wheat–summer maizeTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Treatment
P surpluse0
Outcome
Olsen-P valuese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4.07 mg kg-1e0
Qualifier
every 100 kg of P surpluse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Olsen-P values, which increased by 4.07 mg kg-1 of P for every 100 kg of P surplus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1357 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat–summer maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–159 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors conclude P balance can guide phosphorus management.

Taxon
winter wheat–summer maizeTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Outcome
P balance can be used as a critical indicator for P management in agriculturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the P balance can be used as a critical indicator for P management in agriculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1449 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat–summer maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–159 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

189 papers: 174 positive, 15 negative or no effect

173 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

185 papers more in this group

See all 189 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 27 positive, 6 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 26 positive, 8 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

176 papers: 142 positive, 34 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

172 papers more in this group

See all 176 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

572 papers: 524 positive, 48 negative or no effect

523 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

568 papers more in this group

See all 572 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

627 papers: 549 positive, 78 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 69 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

623 papers more in this group

See all 627 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.