Paper · 2023 · Polish Journal of Environmental Studies

Impact of Various Organic Fertilizerson the Growth, Yield, and Soil Environmentof Peanuts Subjected to ContinuousCropping Obstacles

Zheng Liu; Yuheng Song; Liqun Ge; et al.

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

To clarify the improvement effect of organic fertilizer application on peanut continuous cropping obstacles, a field plot experiment was conducted in a plot that had been continuously cropped with peanut for 5 years. Equal amounts of nitrogen were applied to the plot using charcoal-based fertilizer (T2), pig manure compost (T3), and chicken manure compost (T4), while chemical fertilizer (T1) and no fertilizer (CK) were used as controls. The study investigated peanut agronomic traits, yield and its contributing factors, soil physical and chemical properties, and peanut leaf diseases. The results showed that all three types of organic fertilizers could significantly promote peanut growth, with the T3 performing the best. The main stem height, length of the first lateral branch, and number of branches per plant in the T3 were 31.45%, 21.28%, and 26.32% higher than those in the CK, respectively. There was no significant difference between the T2 and T4 s in terms of main stem height and number of branches per plant compared to the T3. In terms of yield and its contributing factors, the performance of organic fertilizers was significantly better than that of the T1 and CK s. Among them, the T3 had the highest yield, which was 36.81% and 22.07% higher than that of the CK and T1 s, respectively. There was no significant difference between the T4 and the T3. The T2 and T4 s had the highest hundred-pod weight, while the T3 and T4 s had the lowest number of pods per kilogram. There was no significant difference in hundredkernel weight among the three types of organic fertilizers. In terms of soil physical and chemical properties, the application of organic fertilizers significantly increased soil pH, porosity, field water holding capacity, and decreased soil bulk density compared to chemical fertilizer and no-fertilizer s. There was no significant difference in these indicators among the organic fertilizer s. In terms of soil nutrient content, all fertilization s significantly increased the content of total nitrogen, alkaline nitrogen, available phosphorus, and available potassium in the soil. Among them, the organic fertilizer treatments were significantly better than the chemical fertilizer in terms of total nitrogen and available phosphorus content. Additionally, organic fertilizer s significantly increased the soil organic carbon content, with the T2 having the highest organic carbon content, which was 20.56% higher than that of the CK. In terms of soil phenolic acid content, organic fertilizer s significantly reduced the content of vanillic acid and coumarin in the soil, with the lowest coumarin content observed in the T3 and T4 s. In terms of peanut leaf diseases, the disease index of peanut leaf spot and brown spot were significantly lower in the organic fertilizer s than in the no-fertilizer and chemical fertilizer s, but there was no significant difference between the different organic fertilizer s. After the comprehensive evaluation of the affiliation function method, it can be found that T4 can alleviate the continuous cropping obstacle to the greatest extent. The conclusion drawn from this study is that biochar-based fertilizer, pig manure compost, and chicken manure compost can all promote growth, increase yield, improve soil environmental quality, and provide certain disease prevention and control effects for peanut plants under continuous cropping obstacles. It is recommended to choose organic fertilizer for application in areas where peanut continuous cropping is more serious in a timely and site-specific manner.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All three organic fertilizers significantly promoted peanut growth, with pig manure compost best.

Taxon
PeanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
all three types of organic fertilizerse0
Outcome
peanut growthe0
Direction
promotee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“all three types of organic fertilizers could significantly promote peanut growth, with the T3 performing the best”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–727 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 raised main stem height 31.45% relative to CK.

Taxon
PeanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
main stem heighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
31.45%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“main stem height, length of the first lateral branch, and number of branches per plant in the T3 were 31.45%, 21.28%, and 26.32% higher than those in the CK, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–903 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 raised first lateral branch length 21.28% relative to CK.

Taxon
PeanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
length of the first lateral branche0
Direction
highere0
Value
21.28%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“main stem height, length of the first lateral branch, and number of branches per plant in the T3 were 31.45%, 21.28%, and 26.32% higher than those in the CK, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–903 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 raised branch number 26.32% relative to CK.

Taxon
PeanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
number of branches per plante0
Direction
highere0
Value
26.32%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“main stem height, length of the first lateral branch, and number of branches per plant in the T3 were 31.45%, 21.28%, and 26.32% higher than those in the CK, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–903 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 and T4 did not differ significantly from T3 in stem height and branch number.

Taxon
PeanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
T2 and T4e0
Outcome
main stem height and number of branches per plante0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
T3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“There was no significant difference between the T2 and T4 s in terms of main stem height and number of branches per plant compared to the T3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1045 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizers performed significantly better than chemical and no fertilizer for yield and contributing factors.

Taxon
PeanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
organic fertilizerse0
Outcome
yield and its contributing factorse0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
T1 and CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“In terms of yield and its contributing factors, the performance of organic fertilizers was significantly better than that of the T1 and CK s”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 yield was 36.81% higher than CK.

Taxon
PeanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
36.81%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“T3 had the highest yield, which was 36.81% and 22.07% higher than that of the CK and T1 s, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1308 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 yield was 22.07% higher than T1.

Taxon
PeanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
22.07%e0
Comparator
T1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“T3 had the highest yield, which was 36.81% and 22.07% higher than that of the CK and T1 s, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1308 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 and T3 yields did not differ significantly.

Taxon
PeanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
differencee0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
T3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“There was no significant difference between the T4 and the T3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1371 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 and T4 had the highest hundred-pod weight.

Taxon
PeanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
T2 and T4e0
Outcome
hundred-pod weighte0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“The T2 and T4 s had the highest hundred-pod weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1423 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 and T4 had the lowest pods per kilogram.

Taxon
PeanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
T3 and T4e0
Outcome
number of pods per kilograme0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“T3 and T4 s had the lowest number of pods per kilogram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1435–1489 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hundred-kernel weight did not differ significantly among organic fertilizers.

Taxon
PeanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
three types of organic fertilizerse0
Outcome
hundredkernel weighte0
Direction
no significant differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“There was no significant difference in hundredkernel weight among the three types of organic fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1491–1595 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizers increased soil pH, porosity and water holding capacity relative to controls.

Taxon
PeanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
organic fertilizerse0
Outcome
soil pH, porosity, field water holding capacitye0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
chemical fertilizer and no-fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of organic fertilizers significantly increased soil pH, porosity, field water holding capacity, and decreased soil bulk density compared to chemical fertilizer and no-fertilizer s”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1652–1843 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizers decreased soil bulk density relative to controls.

Taxon
PeanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
organic fertilizerse0
Outcome
soil bulk densitye0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
chemical fertilizer and no-fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of organic fertilizers significantly increased soil pH, porosity, field water holding capacity, and decreased soil bulk density compared to chemical fertilizer and no-fertilizer s”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1652–1843 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization increased soil total nitrogen, alkaline nitrogen and available phosphorus.

Taxon
PeanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
all fertilizatione0
Outcome
total nitrogen, alkaline nitrogen, available phosphoruse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“all fertilization s significantly increased the content of total nitrogen, alkaline nitrogen, available phosphorus, and available potassium in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1968–2119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization increased soil available potassium.

Taxon
PeanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
all fertilizatione0
Outcome
available potassiume0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“all fertilization s significantly increased the content of total nitrogen, alkaline nitrogen, available phosphorus, and available potassium in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1968–2119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer increased soil organic carbon, with T2 20.56% above CK.

Taxon
PeanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
T2e0
Outcome
soil organic carbon contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
20.56%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“organic fertilizer s significantly increased the soil organic carbon content, with the T2 having the highest organic carbon content, which was 20.56% higher than that of the CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2297–2473 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizers reduced soil vanillic acid and coumarin, with lowest coumarin under T3 and T4.

Taxon
PeanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
organic fertilizere0
Outcome
content of vanillic acid and coumarin in the soile0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“organic fertilizer s significantly reduced the content of vanillic acid and coumarin in the soil, with the lowest coumarin content observed in the T3 and T4 s”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2515–2673 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizers reduced peanut leaf spot and brown spot disease indices relative to controls.

Taxon
PeanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
organic fertilizere0
Outcome
disease index of peanut leaf spot and brown spote0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
no-fertilizer and chemical fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“disease index of peanut leaf spot and brown spot were significantly lower in the organic fertilizer s than in the no-fertilizer and chemical fertilizer s”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2713–2866 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The comprehensive evaluation found T4 best alleviated continuous cropping obstacles.

Taxon
PeanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
continuous cropping obstaclee0
Direction
greatest extente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“T4 can alleviate the continuous cropping obstacle to the greatest extent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3044–3116 · show in text ↑

fertilization · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 25 positive, 2 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 47 positive, 4 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

153 papers: 147 positive, 6 negative or no effect

146 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

149 papers more in this group

See all 153 papers →

fertilization · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

204 papers: 182 positive, 22 negative or no effect

181 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

200 papers more in this group

See all 204 papers →

fertilization · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

683 papers: 635 positive, 48 negative or no effect

634 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

679 papers more in this group

See all 683 papers →

fertilization · soil: physics · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

33 papers: 33 positive, 0 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.