Paper · 2023 · Notulae Scientia Biologicae

Combined treatment with gibberellic acid and thidiazuron improves fruit quality of ‘Red Dream’ grape cultivar

Su-Yeon LEE; Jae-Yun HEO

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
6
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the effect of treatment conditions of plant growth regulators on the marketability of ‘Red Dream’, a triploid grape. In order to achieve the purpose of this study, gibberellic acid 3 (GA3) 100 ppm single use treatment group was set as a control group. In addition, the fruit characteristics expressed when cytokinins such as thidiazuron (TDZ) or forchlorfenuron (CPPU) 2.5 ppm or 5.0 ppm mixed with GA3 100 ppm were compared with the control group. Cluster weight was commonly higher in the mixed treatment of TDZ or CPPU than in the GA3 single use treatment, and it was found that the cytokinin mixed treatment could effectively induce the enlargement of ‘Red Dream’ berries. Although the harvesting period was slightly delayed compared to GA3 single use treatment in the case of mixed treatment of GA3 and TDZ or CPPU, there was no inhibition of coloration, soluble solid sugar content and functionality, which are important indicators of marketability. In particular, in the GA3 100 ppm + TDZ 5 ppm treatment group, where the enlargement of fruits was the largest, the occurrence rate of non-commercial berry was also found to be the lowest. Therefore, it is expected to contribute to strengthening the marketability of ‘Red Dream’ if such plant growth regulator treatment condition is applied during cultivation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TDZ with GA3 increased cluster weight versus GA3 alone.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
TDZe0
Outcome
Cluster weighte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
GA3 single use treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“Cluster weight was commonly higher in the mixed treatment of TDZ or CPPU than in the GA3 single use treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–598 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CPPU with GA3 increased cluster weight versus GA3 alone.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
CPPUe0
Outcome
Cluster weighte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
GA3 single use treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“Cluster weight was commonly higher in the mixed treatment of TDZ or CPPU than in the GA3 single use treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–598 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cytokinin mixtures enlarged Red Dream berries.

Taxon
Red Dreame0
Treatment
cytokinin mixed treatmente0
Outcome
enlargement of ‘Red Dream’ berriese0
Direction
enlargemente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“cytokinin mixed treatment could effectively induce the enlargement of ‘Red Dream’ berries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–715 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 with TDZ or CPPU slightly delayed harvest versus GA3 alone.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
mixed treatment of GA3 and TDZ or CPPUe0
Outcome
harvesting periode0
Direction
delayede0
Comparator
GA3 single use treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“harvesting period was slightly delayed compared to GA3 single use treatment in the case of mixed treatment of GA3 and TDZ or CPPU”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–859 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 with TDZ or CPPU did not inhibit coloration, soluble solid sugar content or functionality.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
mixed treatment of GA3 and TDZ or CPPUe1
Outcome
coloration, soluble solid sugar content and functionalitye0
Direction
no inhibitione0
Comparator
GA3 single use treatmente1

Verbatim

e0

“there was no inhibition of coloration, soluble solid sugar content and functionality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–945 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to GA3 single use treatment in the case of mixed treatment of GA3 and TDZ or CPPU”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–859 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 100 ppm plus TDZ 5 ppm produced the largest fruit enlargement.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
GA3 100 ppm + TDZ 5 ppme0
Outcome
enlargement of fruitse0
Direction
largeste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“in the GA3 100 ppm + TDZ 5 ppm treatment group, where the enlargement of fruits was the largest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1106 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 100 ppm plus TDZ 5 ppm produced the lowest noncommercial berry occurrence.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
GA3 100 ppm + TDZ 5 ppme0
Outcome
occurrence rate of non-commercial berrye0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“in the GA3 100 ppm + TDZ 5 ppm treatment group, where the enlargement of fruits was the largest, the occurrence rate of non-commercial berry was also found to be the lowest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1183 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–100 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · quality: sugar starch · VitisResults differ

21 papers: 16 positive, 5 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

forchlorfenuron · quality: sugar starch · VitisPositive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Thidiazuron · yield · VitisResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

forchlorfenuron · yield · VitisResults agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.