Paper · 2023 · South African Journal of Botany

Elucidating the role of reactive oxygen species metabolism and phenylpropanoid pathway during an incompatible interaction between apple-Venturia inaequalis host-pathosystem

Sheikh Mansoor; Aafreen Sakina; Mudasir A. Mir; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
11
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

• Plants have developed complex defense mechanisms against pathogen attack, including expression of genes and production of different metabolites. • The study used molecular and biochemical techniques to investigate the expression of genes and molecules involved in incompatible interaction. • Results showed upregulation of genes involved in ROS metabolism and the phenylpropanoid pathway, higher levels of ROS and phenylpropanoid compounds. • Specific genes encoding enzymes involved in the synthesis of flavonoids and lignin were also upregulated in response to V. Inaequalis pathogenesis. Scab disease of apple caused by Venturia inaequalis results in significant economic losses in the apple industry throughout the apple growing regions of world. In present study, we investigated the response of apple cv. Prima against the V. inaequalis by examining the levels of antioxidants, reactive oxygen species (ROS) metabolism, and gene expression of the phenylpropanoid pathway. We found that the inoculated plant showed a significant increase in metabolites and enzyme activities involved in ROS metabolism. There was a considerable rise in antioxidants (metabolites) like apigenin, p-coumaric acid, (+) -catechin, epicatechin, quercetin, phloridzin, rutin, ferulic acid, and sinapic acid in the inoculated plant from 28 to 108.84 (g −1 FW). Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity increased from 8.22 to 11.61 u/gm whereas catalase (CAT) activity increased from 22. 08 to 48.62 u/gm and peroxidase (POD) activity increased from 60.67 to 105.05 u/gm in treated. Gene expression was enhanced by 8.92, 19.92, 27.44, and 32.45 folds with respect to control at different stages of inoculation. The expression of genes in the phenylpropanoid pathway was also highly upregulated in response to the pathogen. The plant's defense response triggered a hypersensitive response (HR), which limited the growth of the pathogen V. inaequalis . The results suggest that the synthesis and accumulation of polyphenols play an essential role in the plant's defense response against the pathogen, and some components of the phenylpropanoid pathway may exhibit broad-spectrum disease resistance without yield penalties.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated apple plants had significantly increased ROS-related metabolites and enzyme activities.

Treatment
inoculatede0
Outcome
metabolites and enzyme activities involved in ROS metabolisme0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We found that the inoculated plant showed a significant increase in metabolites and enzyme activities involved in ROS metabolism.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1109 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated plants had increased concentrations of the named antioxidants.

Treatment
inoculatede0
Outcome
antioxidants (metabolites)e0
Direction
risee0
Value
28 to 108.84 (g −1 FW)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a considerable rise in antioxidants (metabolites) like apigenin, p-coumaric acid, (+) -catechin, epicatechin, quercetin, phloridzin, rutin, ferulic acid, and sinapic acid in the inoculated plant from 28 to 108.84 (g −1 FW).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1343 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Superoxide dismutase activity increased from 8.22 to 11.61 u/gm.

Treatment
treatede0
Outcome
Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
11.61 u/gme0
Qualifier
8.22e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity increased from 8.22 to 11.61 u/gm whereas catalase (CAT) activity increased from 22. 08 to 48.62 u/gm and peroxidase (POD) activity increased from 60.67 to 105.05 u/gm in treated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1559 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Catalase activity increased from 22.08 to 48.62 u/gm.

Treatment
treatede0
Outcome
catalase (CAT) activitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
48.62 u/gme0
Qualifier
22. 08e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity increased from 8.22 to 11.61 u/gm whereas catalase (CAT) activity increased from 22. 08 to 48.62 u/gm and peroxidase (POD) activity increased from 60.67 to 105.05 u/gm in treated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1559 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peroxidase activity increased from 60.67 to 105.05 u/gm.

Treatment
treatede0
Outcome
peroxidase (POD) activitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
105.05 u/gme0
Qualifier
60.67e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity increased from 8.22 to 11.61 u/gm whereas catalase (CAT) activity increased from 22. 08 to 48.62 u/gm and peroxidase (POD) activity increased from 60.67 to 105.05 u/gm in treated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1559 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gene expression increased 8.92-fold at one inoculation stage.

Treatment
inoculatione0
Outcome
Gene expressione0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
8.92e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gene expression was enhanced by 8.92, 19.92, 27.44, and 32.45 folds with respect to control at different stages of inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1560–1687 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gene expression increased 19.92-fold at another inoculation stage.

Treatment
inoculatione0
Outcome
Gene expressione0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
19.92e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gene expression was enhanced by 8.92, 19.92, 27.44, and 32.45 folds with respect to control at different stages of inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1560–1687 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gene expression increased 27.44-fold at another inoculation stage.

Treatment
inoculatione0
Outcome
Gene expressione0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
27.44e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gene expression was enhanced by 8.92, 19.92, 27.44, and 32.45 folds with respect to control at different stages of inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1560–1687 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gene expression increased 32.45-fold at another inoculation stage.

Treatment
inoculatione0
Outcome
Gene expressione0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
32.45 foldse0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gene expression was enhanced by 8.92, 19.92, 27.44, and 32.45 folds with respect to control at different stages of inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1560–1687 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phenylpropanoid pathway gene expression was highly upregulated in response to the pathogen.

Treatment
pathogene0
Outcome
expression of genes in the phenylpropanoid pathwaye0
Direction
upregulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The expression of genes in the phenylpropanoid pathway was also highly upregulated in response to the pathogen.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1688–1799 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–135 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The apple defense response triggered hypersensitive response that limited V. inaequalis growth.

Interactor
V. inaequalisVenturia inaequalise0pathogen
Outcome
growth of the pathogen V. inaequalise0
Qualifier
hypersensitive response (HR)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Venturia inaequalis
Venturia inaequalis · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plant's defense response triggered a hypersensitive response (HR), which limited the growth of the pathogen V. inaequalis .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1800–1927 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–135 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that polyphenol synthesis and accumulation contribute to apple defense.

Compound
polyphenolse0
Outcome
plant's defense responsee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results suggest that the synthesis and accumulation of polyphenols play an essential role in the plant's defense response against the pathogen, and some components of the phenylpropanoid pathway may exhibit broad-spectrum disease resistance without yield penalties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1928–2197 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–135 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest phenylpropanoid components may confer broad-spectrum resistance without yield penalties.

Outcome
broad-spectrum disease resistance without yield penaltiese0
Qualifier
components of the phenylpropanoid pathwaye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results suggest that the synthesis and accumulation of polyphenols play an essential role in the plant's defense response against the pathogen, and some components of the phenylpropanoid pathway may exhibit broad-spectrum disease resistance without yield penalties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1928–2197 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–135 · show in text ↑

inoculation · molecular: expression · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.