Paper · 2023 · Agronomy

Single-Time Mechanical Deep Placement Fertilization Using Bulk Blending Fertilizer on Machine-Transplanted Rice: Balanced Yield, Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency, and Economic Benefits

Rongchuan He; Yuhui Wang; Jiaqi Li; et al.

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Despite growing interest in controlled-release N fertilizers (CRNFs) because of their potential for enhancing nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and economic returns, their comprehensive impact on machine-transplanted rice remains to be understudied. To address this gap, here, we present a two-year field experiment that assessed the impact of CRNF using mechanical deep placement fertilization (DPF) on rice cultivation. The study involved three CRNF types (bulk blending fertilizer (BBF), polymer-coated urea (PCU), and sulfur-coated urea (SCU)) and two fertilization methods (DPF and broadcast application), with a high-yield split fertilization of urea as a control (CK). The results showed that DPF, especially with SCU, greatly enhanced soil NH4+-N concentrations, NUE, rice yield, and economic benefits compared to broadcast application. BBF consistently exhibited superior NUE and notable economic benefits, regardless of the application method used. Conversely, single-time application of PCU was less favorable for rice growth. In conclusion, for optimal economic benefits and NUE, DPF combined with single-time application of SCU is recommended. However, if deep application is not feasible and only broadcasting is possible in rice cultivation, BBF emerges as the ideal choice for both high NUE and significant economic returns. This research offers insights for improved nitrogen management in machine-transplanted rice, effectively optimizing yield, NUE, and profitability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep placement fertilization, especially with sulfur-coated urea, greatly enhanced soil NH4+-N concentrations compared with broadcast application in machine-transplanted rice.

Treatment
DPFe0
Outcome
soil NH4+-N concentrationse0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
especially with SCUe0
Comparator
broadcast applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Transplanted Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“DPF, especially with SCU, greatly enhanced soil NH4+-N concentrations, NUE, rice yield, and economic benefits compared to broadcast application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–839 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep placement fertilization, especially with sulfur-coated urea, greatly enhanced nitrogen use efficiency, rice yield and economic benefits compared with broadcast application.

Treatment
DPFe0
Outcome
NUE, rice yield, and economic benefitse0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
especially with SCUe0
Comparator
broadcast applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Transplanted Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“DPF, especially with SCU, greatly enhanced soil NH4+-N concentrations, NUE, rice yield, and economic benefits compared to broadcast application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–839 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bulk blending fertilizer consistently gave superior nitrogen use efficiency and notable economic benefits regardless of application method.

Treatment
BBFe0
Outcome
NUE and notable economic benefitse0
Direction
superiore0
Qualifier
regardless of the application method usede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Transplanted Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“BBF consistently exhibited superior NUE and notable economic benefits, regardless of the application method used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–953 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single-time application of polymer-coated urea was less favorable for rice growth.

Treatment
application of PCUe0
Outcome
rice growthe0
Direction
less favorablee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of PCU was less favorable for rice growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1032 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

For optimal economic benefits and nitrogen use efficiency, deep placement fertilization combined with single-time application of sulfur-coated urea is recommended.

Treatment
DPF combined with single-time application of SCUe0
Outcome
optimal economic benefits and NUEe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Transplanted Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“for optimal economic benefits and NUE, DPF combined with single-time application of SCU is recommended”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1151 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

If deep application is not feasible and only broadcasting is possible in rice cultivation, bulk blending fertilizer is the ideal choice for high nitrogen use efficiency and economic returns.

Treatment
BBFe0
Outcome
high NUE and significant economic returnse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“if deep application is not feasible and only broadcasting is possible in rice cultivation, BBF emerges as the ideal choice for both high NUE and significant economic returns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1335 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

220 papers: 202 positive, 18 negative or no effect

201 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

216 papers more in this group

See all 220 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

511 papers: 402 positive, 109 negative or no effect

108 papers in the same direction as this paper · 402 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.