Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Influence of Different Fertility Levels on Growth and Quality of Pearl millet in Mid Hills of Himachal Pradesh, India

Priyanka; Ranjeet Singh Bochalya; Kartikeya Choudhary

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present study was conducted at Shoolini University, Solan during the kharif season 2022 to evaluate the influence of Different Fertility Levels on Growth and Quality of Pearl millet in Mid Hills of Himachal Pradesh. The soil of the experimental site was fertile with uniform sandy loam texture, medium in N and K but high in phosphorus availability. The experiment was laid out in RBD comprising of ten treatments (T1) Control, (T2) 100% RDF, (T3) 120% RDF, (T4) 50% RDF + FYM @ 10 t ha-1, (T5) 75% RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha-1), (T6) 100% RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha-1, (T7) 50% RDF + Vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha-1, (T8) 75% RDF + Vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha-1, (T9) 100% RDF + Vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha-1 and (T10) 75% RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha-1 + Vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha-1 and and replicated thrice. Pearl millet cultivar PHB-2884 was sown at spacing of 45 × 15 cm with the seed rate of 4 Kg ha-1. Plant population, plant height, nitrogen content & uptake and protein yield were recorded significantly higher with application of (T3) 120% RDF which was statistically at par with (T9) 100% RDF + Vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha-1, (T6) 100% RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha-1 and (T2) 100% RDF. However, least values of these characters were recorded under (T1) control treatment. Findings can be concluded as the significantly higher Growth, and quality produce by pearl millet were observed with application of (T3) 120% RDF and was at par with (T2) 100% RDF, (T9) 100% RDF + Vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha-1 and (T6) 100% RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha-1 over rest of the treatments. Thus, application of (T3) 120% RDF was found to be most promising treatment in enhancing the growth and quality of pearl millet.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

120% RDF significantly increased pearl millet Plant population and was statistically at par with three other treatments.

Taxon
Pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
120% RDFe0
Outcome
Plant populatione0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
statistically at pare0
Comparator
100% RDF + Vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–77 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plant population, plant height, nitrogen content & uptake and protein yield were recorded significantly higher with application of (T3) 120% RDF which was statistically at par with (T9) 100% RDF + Vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha-1, (T6) 100% RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha-1 and (T2) 100% RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–1145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

120% RDF significantly increased pearl millet plant height and was statistically at par with three other treatments.

Taxon
Pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
120% RDFe0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
statistically at pare0
Comparator
100% RDF + Vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–77 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plant population, plant height, nitrogen content & uptake and protein yield were recorded significantly higher with application of (T3) 120% RDF which was statistically at par with (T9) 100% RDF + Vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha-1, (T6) 100% RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha-1 and (T2) 100% RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–1145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

120% RDF significantly increased pearl millet nitrogen content and was statistically at par with three other treatments.

Taxon
Pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
120% RDFe0
Outcome
nitrogen contente0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
statistically at pare0
Comparator
100% RDF + Vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–77 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plant population, plant height, nitrogen content & uptake and protein yield were recorded significantly higher with application of (T3) 120% RDF which was statistically at par with (T9) 100% RDF + Vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha-1, (T6) 100% RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha-1 and (T2) 100% RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–1145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

120% RDF significantly increased pearl millet uptake and was statistically at par with three other treatments.

Taxon
Pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
120% RDFe0
Outcome
uptakee0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
statistically at pare0
Comparator
100% RDF + Vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–77 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plant population, plant height, nitrogen content & uptake and protein yield were recorded significantly higher with application of (T3) 120% RDF which was statistically at par with (T9) 100% RDF + Vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha-1, (T6) 100% RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha-1 and (T2) 100% RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–1145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

120% RDF significantly increased pearl millet protein yield and was statistically at par with three other treatments.

Taxon
Pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
120% RDFe0
Outcome
protein yielde0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
statistically at pare0
Comparator
100% RDF + Vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–77 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plant population, plant height, nitrogen content & uptake and protein yield were recorded significantly higher with application of (T3) 120% RDF which was statistically at par with (T9) 100% RDF + Vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha-1, (T6) 100% RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha-1 and (T2) 100% RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–1145 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control had the lowest values of the reported growth and quality characters.

Taxon
Pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
control treatmente0
Outcome
these characterse0
Direction
leaste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–77 · show in text ↑
e0

“However, least values of these characters were recorded under (T1) control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1231 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identify 120% RDF as the most promising treatment for pearl millet growth and quality.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
120% RDFe0
Outcome
most promising treatment in enhancing the growth and qualitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thus, application of (T3) 120% RDF was found to be most promising treatment in enhancing the growth and quality of pearl millet.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1519–1647 · show in text ↑

fertilization · pest · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · growth · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

70 papers: 68 positive, 2 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

75 papers: 72 positive, 3 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

43 papers: 43 positive, 0 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.