Abstract
A field experiment was carried out at Instructional farm, Mohanpur, West Bengal, India during the rainy season of 2016 and 2017 to study the bio-efficacy of glufosinate ammonium 13.5% SL (15% w/v) herbicide on weed con- trol, growth and yield of Bt-cotton hybrid (Gossypium hirsutum L.). The experiment was conducted in 3 times repli- cated randomized block design (RBD) comprising 7 weed-control treatments, viz. 4 doses of glufosinate ammo- nium 13.5% SL (15% W/V) @ 300, 375, 450 and 525 g/ha, paraquat dichloride 24% SL @ 500 g/ha, hand-weeding (weed-free control) and weedy control. The weed-free treatment by frequent hand-weeding showed maximum growth parameters, yield attributes and yield of cotton. Among the herbicidal treatments, the post-emergence ap- plication of glufosinate ammonium 13.5% SL (15% W/V) @ 525 g/ha was found to be the alternative of hand-weed- ing in respect to weed-control efficiency, growth and yield of cotton. This treatment also realized the highest net re- turn (` 41,689/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (2.11), followed by glufosinate ammonium 13.5% SL (15% W/V) @ 450 g/ ha.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Frequent hand weeding gave maximum cotton growth parameters.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Treatment
- frequent hand-weedinge0
- Outcome
- growth parameterse0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The weed-free treatment by frequent hand-weeding showed maximum growth parameters, yield attributes and yield of cotton.”
t0“cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Frequent hand weeding gave maximum cotton yield attributes and yield.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- frequent hand-weedinge0
- Outcome
- yield attributes and yield of cottone0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The weed-free treatment by frequent hand-weeding showed maximum growth parameters, yield attributes and yield of cotton.”
t0“cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Glufosinate at 525 g/ha was the herbicide alternative to hand weeding for weed control, growth and yield.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- glufosinate ammonium 13.5% SL (15% W/V) @ 525 g/hae0
- Outcome
- weed-control efficiency, growth and yield of cottone0
- Direction
- alternativee0
- Comparator
- hand-weed- inge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“glufosinate ammonium 13.5% SL (15% W/V) @ 525 g/ha was found to be the alternative of hand-weed- ing in respect to weed-control efficiency, growth and yield of cotton”
t0“cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
The 525 g/ha glufosinate treatment had the highest net return of ` 41,689/ha.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- glufosinate ammonium 13.5% SL (15% W/V) @ 525 g/hae1
- Outcome
- net re- turne0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- ` 41,689/hae0
- Comparator
- glufosinate ammonium 13.5% SL (15% W/V) @ 450 g/ hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“This treatment also realized the highest net re- turn (` 41,689/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (2.11), followed by glufosinate ammonium 13.5% SL (15% W/V) @ 450 g/ ha.”
e1“glufosinate ammonium 13.5% SL (15% W/V) @ 525 g/ha”
t0“cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
The 525 g/ha treatment had the highest benefit to cost ratio, 2.11.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- glufosinate ammonium 13.5% SL (15% W/V) @ 525 g/hae1
- Outcome
- benefit: cost ratioe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 2.11e0
- Comparator
- glufosinate ammonium 13.5% SL (15% W/V) @ 450 g/ hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“This treatment also realized the highest net re- turn (` 41,689/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (2.11), followed by glufosinate ammonium 13.5% SL (15% W/V) @ 450 g/ ha.”
e1“glufosinate ammonium 13.5% SL (15% W/V) @ 525 g/ha”
t0“cotton”
The same questions in other papers
glufosinate · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →glufosinate · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →herbicide · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
31 papers more in this group
See all 35 papers →nitrogen · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →herbicide · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
178 papers more in this group
See all 182 papers →nitrogen · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
285 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
339 papers more in this group
See all 343 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.