Paper · 2024 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Effect of different phosphorus sources on P-uptake and yield of rice in acidic soil: a study of phosphorus availability dynamics

Sagolshem Kalidas-Singh; Dwipendra Thakuria; Hazarika Samarendra; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Phosphorus (P) limitation in acidic soils is well known and P-use and -recovery efficiency (PUE and PRE) is quite low. Rhizosphere-based P management has been considered as a means of enhancing PUE in acidic rice soils, but no clear dynamic study on this context. Rice was grown in pots using different P-sources [rock-phosphate (RP), single-super-phosphate (SSP), compost, P solubilizing bacteria (PSB), PSB + RP, PSB + compost, and compost + PSB + RP] in acidic Inceptisols (pH 4.31). Additionally, a micro-plot field experiment validated the results, using control, SSP, RP, PSB, and PSB + RP. Available-P (AvlP) and pH were analyzed every 10-days, while acid-phosphomonoesterases activity (PHA) and P-uptake in every 30-days until harvest. AvlP was peaked at 20 days after transplanting (DAT) and decreased until harvest. Compost + PSB + RP maintained significantly higher AvlP, soil pH and PHA, while root volume was highest in SSP throughout the growing period, and Soil pH showed an asymptotic trend. The P-content and uptake in biomass showed the highest peak at 60DAT and gradually declined until harvest. The effects of SSP and compost + PSB + RP on grain yield, chlorophyll concentration index (CCI), grain P content and uptake were comparable, but PUE and PRE were higher in compost + PSB + RP. Similar result was also observed in micro-plot field experiment, wherein grain yield and P uptake were comparable in SSP broadcast and PSB + RP. The study clearly shows that the combined application of PSB with RP, compost, or both in a 50% reduced amount can maintain higher AvlP in rice in acidic soil compared to full dose SSP while achieving a comparable yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Available P peaked 20 days after transplanting then declined through harvest.

Outcome
AvlPe0
Direction
peakede0
Qualifier
20 days after transplanting (DAT)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AvlP was peaked at 20 days after transplanting (DAT) and decreased until harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–824 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost plus PSB plus RP maintained significantly higher available P, soil pH, and PHA.

Treatment
Compost + PSB + RPe0
Outcome
AvlP, soil pH and PHAe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compost + PSB + RP maintained significantly higher AvlP, soil pH and PHA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–898 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SSP produced the highest root volume throughout growth.

Treatment
SSPe0
Outcome
root volumee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root volume was highest in SSP throughout the growing period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–966 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH followed an asymptotic trend.

Outcome
Soil pHe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil pH showed an asymptotic trend”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1006 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass P content and uptake peaked at 60 DAT then declined until harvest.

Outcome
P-content and uptake in biomasse0
Direction
highest peake0
Qualifier
60DATe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The P-content and uptake in biomass showed the highest peak at 60DAT and gradually declined until harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1113 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SSP and compost plus PSB plus RP gave comparable grain yield, chlorophyll index, grain P content and uptake.

Treatment
compost + PSB + RPe0
Outcome
grain yield, chlorophyll concentration index (CCI), grain P content and uptakee0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
SSPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of SSP and compost + PSB + RP on grain yield, chlorophyll concentration index (CCI), grain P content and uptake were comparable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1254 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PUE and PRE were higher with compost plus PSB plus RP.

Treatment
compost + PSB + RPe0
Outcome
PUE and PREe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PUE and PRE were higher in compost + PSB + RP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1305 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field grain yield and P uptake were comparable under broadcast SSP and PSB plus RP.

Treatment
PSB + RPe0
Outcome
grain yield and P uptakee0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
SSP broadcaste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield and P uptake were comparable in SSP broadcast and PSB + RP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1450 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Combined PSB with RP or compost at half dose maintained higher available P than full dose SSP with comparable yield.

Outcome
combined application of PSB with RP, compost, or both in a 50% reduced amounte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of PSB with RP, compost, or both in a 50% reduced amount can maintain higher AvlP in rice in acidic soil compared to full dose SSP while achieving a comparable yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1485–1671 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 17 positive, 5 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

phosphorus · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 22 positive, 3 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

220 papers: 202 positive, 18 negative or no effect

201 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

216 papers more in this group

See all 220 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

305 papers: 280 positive, 25 negative or no effect

279 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

301 papers more in this group

See all 305 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

inoculation · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

35 papers: 35 positive, 0 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.