Abstract
A field experiment entitled “Effect of Different Moisture Irrigation levels and Moisture Conservation Techniques on Relative Water Content (RWC), Water Use Efficiency and Productivity of Wheat (Triticum aestivum)” was carried out at the Crop Research Centre of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture & Technology, Meerut, U.P. during Rabi season of 2018-19. The experiment was laid out in a split plot design considering the irrigation levels as main plot and moisture conservation techniques as sub plot treatments with three replications. The irrigation levels consisted of I1– (5 irrigations at CRI, tillering, booting, milking and dough stage), I2– (3 irrigation at CRI, tillering and booting stage), I3– (2 irrigation at CRI and booting stage) and moisture conservation techniques consisted M1 – Control (no moisture conservation techniques), M2 - Rice residues @ 5 ton ha-1), M3 - application of Pusa hydrogel (3kg /Acre), M4- seed treatment with Pseudomonas fluorescens (PF6) @ 4 g kg-1 seed, M5- Seed treatment with Pseudomonas fluorescens (PF2) @ 4 g kg-1 seed and M6- Seed treatment with (IRRI-1) @ 4 g kg-1 seed. The soil of the experimental site was sandy loam in texture, low in available nitrogen and organic carbon, medium in available phosphorus, potassium, zinc and alkaline in reaction. Wheat variety HD-2967 was grown as a test crop. Result reveal that relative water content increased with I1 (5 irrigation) and I2 (3 irrigation). The improvement in grain yield 8.74 and 17.38% over I2 and I3 respectively was due to maximum supply of water under I1 (5 irrigation). Water use efficiency was higher under I3 (2 irrigation) compare to various irrigation level during the study a decreased in the frequency of irrigation from I1 (5 irrigations) to I2 (3 irrigation). Among the moisture conservation techniques, relative water content, water use efficiency, straw and grain yield of wheat was recorded with the application of rice residue incorporate @ 5-ton ha-1. Similarly yield attributes.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Relative water content of wheat increased with 5 irrigations (I1) and 3 irrigations (I2).
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- I1 (5 irrigation) and I2 (3 irrigation)e1
- Outcome
- relative water contente1
- Direction
- increasede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Result reveal that relative water content increased with I1 (5 irrigation) and I2 (3 irrigation)”
t0“Effect of different irrigation levels and moisture conservation techniques on relative water content (RWC), water use efficiency and productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield under I1 (5 irrigations) was 8.74% higher than under I2.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- maximum supply of water under I1 (5 irrigation)e2
- Outcome
- grain yielde2
- Direction
- improvemente2
- Value
- 8.74e2
- Comparator
- I2e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“The improvement in grain yield 8.74 and 17.38% over I2 and I3 respectively was due to maximum supply of water under I1 (5 irrigation)”
t0“Effect of different irrigation levels and moisture conservation techniques on relative water content (RWC), water use efficiency and productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield under I1 (5 irrigations) was 17.38% higher than under I3.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- maximum supply of water under I1 (5 irrigation)e2
- Outcome
- grain yielde2
- Direction
- improvemente2
- Value
- 17.38%e2
- Comparator
- I3e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“The improvement in grain yield 8.74 and 17.38% over I2 and I3 respectively was due to maximum supply of water under I1 (5 irrigation)”
t0“Effect of different irrigation levels and moisture conservation techniques on relative water content (RWC), water use efficiency and productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
Claim · model-written summary
Water use efficiency of wheat was higher under 2 irrigations (I3) than under the other irrigation levels.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- I3 (2 irrigation)e3
- Outcome
- Water use efficiencye3
- Direction
- highere3
- Comparator
- various irrigation levele3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“Water use efficiency was higher under I3 (2 irrigation) compare to various irrigation level during the study”
t0“Effect of different irrigation levels and moisture conservation techniques on relative water content (RWC), water use efficiency and productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
Claim · model-written summary
Rice residue incorporated at 5 t/ha was recorded with the highest relative water content and water use efficiency of wheat among moisture conservation techniques.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- rice residue incorporate @ 5-ton ha-1e4
- Outcome
- relative water content, water use efficiencye4
- Comparator
- moisture conservation techniquese4
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“Among the moisture conservation techniques, relative water content, water use efficiency, straw and grain yield of wheat was recorded with the application of rice residue incorporate @ 5-ton ha-1”
t0“Effect of different irrigation levels and moisture conservation techniques on relative water content (RWC), water use efficiency and productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
Claim · model-written summary
Rice residue incorporated at 5 t/ha was recorded with the highest straw and grain yield of wheat among moisture conservation techniques.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- rice residue incorporate @ 5-ton ha-1e4
- Outcome
- straw and grain yielde4
- Comparator
- moisture conservation techniquese4
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“Among the moisture conservation techniques, relative water content, water use efficiency, straw and grain yield of wheat was recorded with the application of rice residue incorporate @ 5-ton ha-1”
t0“Effect of different irrigation levels and moisture conservation techniques on relative water content (RWC), water use efficiency and productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
The same questions in other papers
Oryza sativa · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Oryza sativa · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
127 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
150 papers more in this group
See all 154 papers →irrigation · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
299 papers more in this group
See all 303 papers →irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- negative
985 papers more in this group
See all 989 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.