Abstract
A field experiment was carried out during Rabi season of 2023-24 at Crop Research Farm, Department of Agronomy, SHUATS, Prayagraj. To study the “Effect of foliar application of nutrient on growth and yield of chickpea”. The soil of the experiment site was sandy loam in texture having 0.58% organic carbon, 219 kg/ha available nitrogen, 19.6 kg/ha available phosphorus and 239.2 kg/ha available potassium. Soil reaction was slightly alkaline (pH 7.50). The experiment was laid out (RBD) consisted of 12 treatments with three replication i.e. Water spray at 20 DAS (Vegetative stage) (T1), Water spray at 35 DAS (Pre-flowering stage) (T2), Water spray at 20 DAS (Vegetative stage) + 35 DAS (Pre-flowering stage) (T3), 2% Urea at 20 DAS (Vegetative stage) (T4), 2% Urea at 35 DAS (Pre-flowering stage) (T5), 2% Urea at 20 DAS (Vegetative stage) + 35 DAS (Pre-flowering stage) (T6), 1% KNO3 at 20 DAS (Vegetative stage) (T7), 1% KNO3 at 35 DAS (Pre-flowering stage) (T8), 1% KNO3 at 20 DAS (Vegetative stage) + 35 DAS (Pre-flowering stage) (T9), 0.5% Zinc at 20 DAS (Vegetative stage) (T10), 0.5% Zinc at 35 DAS (Pre-flowering stage) (T11), 0.5% Zinc at 20 DAS (Vegetative stage) + 35 DAS (Pre-flowering stage) (T12) . The results showed that growth and yield attributing characters' viz. plant height (70.4 cm), dry matter accumulation (163.60 g/m2), number of pods/plant (12.9), number of seeds/pod (1.47), seed index (18.3 g), straw yield (3.23 t/ha) and seed yield (2.42 t/ha) were significantly higher with foliar application of 2% Urea at 20 DAS (Vegetative stage) + 35 DAS (Pre-flowering stage) (T6). Maximum gross return (INR 179090), net return (130514.6 INR/ ha), and BC (1:2.69), ratio was obtained highest in the treatment 2% Urea at 20 DAS (Vegetative stage) + 35 DAS (Pre-flowering stage) (T6). Objectives 1. To study the effect of nutrient spray on growth and yield of chickpea. 2. To work out the economics of different treatment combination in chickpea.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar 2% urea at 20 and 35 DAS gave significantly higher plant height (70.4 cm).
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- foliar application of 2% Urea at 20 DAS (Vegetative stage) + 35 DAS (Pre-flowering stage)e0
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- significantly highere0
- Value
- 70.4 cme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“chickpea”
e0“growth and yield attributing characters' viz. plant height (70.4 cm), dry matter accumulation (163.60 g/m2), number of pods/plant (12.9), number of seeds/pod (1.47), seed index (18.3 g), straw yield (3.23 t/ha) and seed yield (2.42 t/ha) were significantly higher with foliar application of 2% Urea at 20 DAS (Vegetative stage) + 35 DAS (Pre-flowering stage) (T6)”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar 2% urea at 20 and 35 DAS gave significantly higher dry matter accumulation (163.60 g/m2).
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- foliar application of 2% Urea at 20 DAS (Vegetative stage) + 35 DAS (Pre-flowering stage)e0
- Outcome
- dry matter accumulatione0
- Direction
- significantly highere0
- Value
- 163.60 g/m2e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“chickpea”
e0“growth and yield attributing characters' viz. plant height (70.4 cm), dry matter accumulation (163.60 g/m2), number of pods/plant (12.9), number of seeds/pod (1.47), seed index (18.3 g), straw yield (3.23 t/ha) and seed yield (2.42 t/ha) were significantly higher with foliar application of 2% Urea at 20 DAS (Vegetative stage) + 35 DAS (Pre-flowering stage) (T6)”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar 2% urea at 20 and 35 DAS gave significantly higher number of pods/plant (12.9).
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- foliar application of 2% Urea at 20 DAS (Vegetative stage) + 35 DAS (Pre-flowering stage)e0
- Outcome
- number of pods/plante0
- Direction
- significantly highere0
- Value
- 12.9e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“chickpea”
e0“growth and yield attributing characters' viz. plant height (70.4 cm), dry matter accumulation (163.60 g/m2), number of pods/plant (12.9), number of seeds/pod (1.47), seed index (18.3 g), straw yield (3.23 t/ha) and seed yield (2.42 t/ha) were significantly higher with foliar application of 2% Urea at 20 DAS (Vegetative stage) + 35 DAS (Pre-flowering stage) (T6)”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar 2% urea at 20 and 35 DAS gave significantly higher number of seeds/pod (1.47).
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- foliar application of 2% Urea at 20 DAS (Vegetative stage) + 35 DAS (Pre-flowering stage)e0
- Outcome
- number of seeds/pode0
- Direction
- significantly highere0
- Value
- 1.47e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“chickpea”
e0“growth and yield attributing characters' viz. plant height (70.4 cm), dry matter accumulation (163.60 g/m2), number of pods/plant (12.9), number of seeds/pod (1.47), seed index (18.3 g), straw yield (3.23 t/ha) and seed yield (2.42 t/ha) were significantly higher with foliar application of 2% Urea at 20 DAS (Vegetative stage) + 35 DAS (Pre-flowering stage) (T6)”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar 2% urea at 20 and 35 DAS gave significantly higher seed index (18.3 g).
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- foliar application of 2% Urea at 20 DAS (Vegetative stage) + 35 DAS (Pre-flowering stage)e0
- Outcome
- seed indexe0
- Direction
- significantly highere0
- Value
- 18.3 ge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“chickpea”
e0“growth and yield attributing characters' viz. plant height (70.4 cm), dry matter accumulation (163.60 g/m2), number of pods/plant (12.9), number of seeds/pod (1.47), seed index (18.3 g), straw yield (3.23 t/ha) and seed yield (2.42 t/ha) were significantly higher with foliar application of 2% Urea at 20 DAS (Vegetative stage) + 35 DAS (Pre-flowering stage) (T6)”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar 2% urea at 20 and 35 DAS gave significantly higher straw yield (3.23 t/ha).
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- foliar application of 2% Urea at 20 DAS (Vegetative stage) + 35 DAS (Pre-flowering stage)e0
- Outcome
- straw yielde0
- Direction
- significantly highere0
- Value
- 3.23 t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“chickpea”
e0“growth and yield attributing characters' viz. plant height (70.4 cm), dry matter accumulation (163.60 g/m2), number of pods/plant (12.9), number of seeds/pod (1.47), seed index (18.3 g), straw yield (3.23 t/ha) and seed yield (2.42 t/ha) were significantly higher with foliar application of 2% Urea at 20 DAS (Vegetative stage) + 35 DAS (Pre-flowering stage) (T6)”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar 2% urea at 20 and 35 DAS gave significantly higher seed yield (2.42 t/ha).
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- foliar application of 2% Urea at 20 DAS (Vegetative stage) + 35 DAS (Pre-flowering stage)e0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- significantly highere0
- Value
- 2.42 t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“chickpea”
e0“growth and yield attributing characters' viz. plant height (70.4 cm), dry matter accumulation (163.60 g/m2), number of pods/plant (12.9), number of seeds/pod (1.47), seed index (18.3 g), straw yield (3.23 t/ha) and seed yield (2.42 t/ha) were significantly higher with foliar application of 2% Urea at 20 DAS (Vegetative stage) + 35 DAS (Pre-flowering stage) (T6)”
Claim · model-written summary
The 2% urea treatment gave the highest gross return (INR 179090).
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- 2% Urea at 20 DAS (Vegetative stage) + 35 DAS (Pre-flowering stage)e0
- Outcome
- gross returne0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- INR 179090e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“chickpea”
e0“Maximum gross return (INR 179090), net return (130514.6 INR/ ha), and BC (1:2.69), ratio was obtained highest in the treatment 2% Urea at 20 DAS (Vegetative stage) + 35 DAS (Pre-flowering stage) (T6)”
Claim · model-written summary
The 2% urea treatment gave the highest net return (130514.6 INR/ ha).
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- 2% Urea at 20 DAS (Vegetative stage) + 35 DAS (Pre-flowering stage)e0
- Outcome
- net returne0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 130514.6 INR/ hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“chickpea”
e0“Maximum gross return (INR 179090), net return (130514.6 INR/ ha), and BC (1:2.69), ratio was obtained highest in the treatment 2% Urea at 20 DAS (Vegetative stage) + 35 DAS (Pre-flowering stage) (T6)”
Claim · model-written summary
The 2% urea treatment gave the highest BC (1:2.69).
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- 2% Urea at 20 DAS (Vegetative stage) + 35 DAS (Pre-flowering stage)e0
- Outcome
- BCe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1:2.69e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“chickpea”
e0“Maximum gross return (INR 179090), net return (130514.6 INR/ ha), and BC (1:2.69), ratio was obtained highest in the treatment 2% Urea at 20 DAS (Vegetative stage) + 35 DAS (Pre-flowering stage) (T6)”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
98 papers more in this group
See all 102 papers →nitrogen · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →application · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
69 papers more in this group
See all 73 papers →application · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
172 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
173 papers more in this group
See all 177 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.