Paper · 2024 · Plant Cell & Environment

Uptake and Accumulation of Cobalt Is Mediated by OsNramp5 in Rice

Hengliang Huang; Naoki Yamaji; Sheng Huang; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT Cobalt (Co) contamination in soils potentially affects human health through the food chain. Although rice ( Oryza sativa ) as a staple food is a major dietary source of human Co intake, it is poorly understood how Co is taken up by the roots and accumulated in rice grain. In this study, we physiologically characterized Co accumulation and identified the transporter for Co 2+ uptake in rice. A dose‐dependent experiment showed that Co mainly accumulated in rice roots. Further analysis with LA‐ICP‐MS showed Co deposited in most tissue of the roots, including exodermis, endodermis and stele region. Co accumulation analysis using mutants defective in divalent cation uptake showed that Co 2+ uptake in rice is mediated by the Mn 2+ /Cd 2+ /Pb 2+ transporter OsNramp5, rather than OsIRT1 for Fe 2+ and OsZIP9 for Zn 2+ . Knockout of OsNramp5 enhanced tolerance to Co toxicity. Heterologous expression of OsNramp5 showed transport activity for Co 2+ in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Co 2+ uptake was inhibited by either Mn 2+ or Cd 2+ supply. At the reproductive stage, the Co concentration in the straw and grains of the OsNramp5 knockout lines was decreased by 41%–48% and 28%–36%, respectively, compared with that of the wild‐type rice. The expression level of OsNramp5 in the roots was not affected by Co 2+ . Taken together, our results indicate that OsNramp5 is a major transporter for Co 2+ uptake in rice, which ultimately mediates Co accumulation in the grains.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cobalt accumulated mainly in rice roots in a dose-dependent experiment.

Organ / stage
rice rootse0
Outcome
Co mainly accumulated in rice rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“A dose‐dependent experiment showed that Co mainly accumulated in rice roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–478 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cobalt was deposited in root exodermis, endodermis and stele.

Organ / stage
exodermis, endodermis and stele regione0
Outcome
Co deposited in most tissue of the rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“Co deposited in most tissue of the roots, including exodermis, endodermis and stele region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 519–609 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice cobalt uptake was mediated by OsNramp5 rather than OsIRT1 or OsZIP9.

Gene
OsNramp5e0
Outcome
Co 2+ uptake in ricee0
Comparator
OsIRT1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“Co 2+ uptake in rice is mediated by the Mn 2+ /Cd 2+ /Pb 2+ transporter OsNramp5, rather than OsIRT1 for Fe 2+ and OsZIP9 for Zn 2+”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–829 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Knocking out OsNramp5 increased rice tolerance to cobalt toxicity.

Treatment
Knockout of OsNramp5e0
Gene
OsNramp5e0
Outcome
tolerance to Co toxicitye0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“Knockout of OsNramp5 enhanced tolerance to Co toxicity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–886 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OsNramp5 transported cobalt in heterologous yeast expression.

Gene
OsNramp5e0
Outcome
transport activity for Co 2+e0
Qualifier
Saccharomyces cerevisiaee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“Heterologous expression of OsNramp5 showed transport activity for Co 2+ in Saccharomyces cerevisiae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–987 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manganese supply inhibited cobalt uptake.

Treatment
Mn 2+e0
Outcome
Co 2+ uptakee0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“Co 2+ uptake was inhibited by either Mn 2+ or Cd 2+ supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1048 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium supply inhibited cobalt uptake.

Treatment
Cd 2+e0
Outcome
Co 2+ uptakee0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“Co 2+ uptake was inhibited by either Mn 2+ or Cd 2+ supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1048 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OsNramp5 knockout reduced straw cobalt by 41%–48% versus wild type.

Material
OsNramp5 knockout linese0
Organ / stage
strawe0
Treatment
OsNramp5 knockout linese0
Outcome
Co concentration in the strawe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
41%–48%e0
Comparator
wild‐type ricee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“Co concentration in the straw and grains of the OsNramp5 knockout lines was decreased by 41%–48% and 28%–36%, respectively, compared with that of the wild‐type rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OsNramp5 knockout reduced grain cobalt by 28%–36% versus wild type.

Material
OsNramp5 knockout linese0
Organ / stage
grainse0
Treatment
OsNramp5 knockout linese0
Outcome
Co concentration in the straw and grainse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
28%–36%e0
Comparator
wild‐type ricee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“Co concentration in the straw and grains of the OsNramp5 knockout lines was decreased by 41%–48% and 28%–36%, respectively, compared with that of the wild‐type rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root OsNramp5 expression was unaffected by cobalt.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
Co 2+e0
Gene
OsNramp5e0
Outcome
expression level of OsNramp5 in the rootse0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“The expression level of OsNramp5 in the roots was not affected by Co 2+”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1318 · show in text ↑

co2 · molecular: expression · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

loss of function · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 86 positive, 68 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 68 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

150 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.