Paper · 2024 · Geoderma Regional

Nitrification inhibitor effect on manganese and phosphorus shoot concentrations in maize under different textured soils from northern Germany

Mathew Edung Etabo; Pablo Lacerda Ribeiro; Britta Pitann; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

High soil pH can result in Mn 2+ and P deficiency, leading to crop yield losses. Therefore, supplying soil with NH 4 + -N fertilizer in stabilized or unstabilized form can increase soil Mn 2+ availability and shoot concentration. Nitrification inhibitors (NIs) have been proposed to lower rhizosphere soil pH, thus improving plant P uptake and preventing P deficiency in soils with high pH. Thus, this study investigated whether NI-stabilized or unstabilized NH 4 + -N could increase Mn 2+ availability in three differently-textured soils (sand, loamy sand, and silt loam) and promote Mn 2+ and P shoot concentration in maize. Two greenhouse experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of applying NH 4 + -N fertilizer with or without the nitrification inhibitor 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP) combined with different nitrogen (N) sources (calcium nitrate (CN), ammonium nitrate (AN), and ammonium sulphate (AS)). The measured variables were bulk and rhizosphere soil pH and Mn 2+ availability, maize biomass, as well as Mn 2+ and P shoot concentrations. The results indicated that DMPP-stabilized AS significantly decreased rhizosphere pH by 7.2 % in loamy sand soil texture compared with unstabilized AS. Similarly, only in the loamy sand texture, DMPP-stabilized AS increased Mn 2+ availability and shoot concentration by 86 % and 47 %, respectively, relative to unstabilized AS. Furthermore, DMPP-treated AS and AN promoted P shoot concentration by 30 % and 21 % in the loamy sand and silt loam soil textures, respectively, relative to the corresponding N sources without DMPP. Conversely, DMPP did not impact the investigated variables in the sand texture for all N sources. Moreover, AN and AS increased biomass yield, Mn 2+ availability, and shoot concentration by 72 %, 30 %, and 46 %, respectively, in relation to the CN fertilizer in the sand soil texture. In conclusion, this study confirmed the effectiveness of DMPP-induced rhizosphere acidification in enhancing Mn 2+ and P shoot concentration in loamy sand soil textures, as well as P shoot concentration in fine-textured soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

DMPP-stabilized ammonium sulphate significantly decreased rhizosphere pH by 7.2 % in loamy sand compared with unstabilized ammonium sulphate.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
DMPP-stabilized ASe1
Outcome
rhizosphere pHe1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
7.2 %e1
Qualifier
loamy sand soil texturee1
Comparator
unstabilized ASe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“DMPP-stabilized AS significantly decreased rhizosphere pH by 7.2 % in loamy sand soil texture compared with unstabilized AS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1222 · show in text ↑
t0

“shoot concentrations in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In loamy sand only, DMPP-stabilized ammonium sulphate increased Mn2+ availability by 86 %.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
DMPP-stabilized ASe2
Compound
Mn 2+e2
Outcome
Mn 2+ availabilitye2
Direction
increasede2
Value
86 %e2
Qualifier
only in the loamy sand texturee2
Comparator
unstabilized ASe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“only in the loamy sand texture, DMPP-stabilized AS increased Mn 2+ availability and shoot concentration by 86 % and 47 %, respectively, relative to unstabilized AS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1398 · show in text ↑
t0

“shoot concentrations in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In loamy sand only, DMPP-stabilized ammonium sulphate increased shoot Mn2+ concentration by 47 %.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
DMPP-stabilized ASe2
Compound
Mn 2+e2
Outcome
shoot concentratione2
Direction
increasede2
Value
47 %e2
Qualifier
only in the loamy sand texturee2
Comparator
unstabilized ASe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“only in the loamy sand texture, DMPP-stabilized AS increased Mn 2+ availability and shoot concentration by 86 % and 47 %, respectively, relative to unstabilized AS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1398 · show in text ↑
t0

“shoot concentrations in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DMPP-treated ammonium sulphate and ammonium nitrate promoted P shoot concentration by 30 % in loamy sand.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
DMPP-treated AS and ANe3
Outcome
P shoot concentratione3
Direction
promotede3
Value
30 %e3
Qualifier
loamy sande3
Comparator
the corresponding N sources without DMPPe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“DMPP-treated AS and AN promoted P shoot concentration by 30 % and 21 % in the loamy sand and silt loam soil textures, respectively, relative to the corresponding N sources without DMPP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1597 · show in text ↑
t0

“shoot concentrations in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DMPP-treated ammonium sulphate and ammonium nitrate promoted P shoot concentration by 21 % in silt loam.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
DMPP-treated AS and ANe3
Outcome
P shoot concentratione3
Direction
promotede3
Value
21 %e3
Qualifier
silt loam soil texturese3
Comparator
the corresponding N sources without DMPPe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“DMPP-treated AS and AN promoted P shoot concentration by 30 % and 21 % in the loamy sand and silt loam soil textures, respectively, relative to the corresponding N sources without DMPP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1597 · show in text ↑
t0

“shoot concentrations in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DMPP had no effect on the investigated variables in sand for any N source.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
DMPPe4
Outcome
investigated variablese4
Direction
did not impacte4
Qualifier
for all N sourcese4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Conversely, DMPP did not impact the investigated variables in the sand texture for all N sources”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1599–1695 · show in text ↑
t0

“shoot concentrations in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium nitrate and ammonium sulphate increased biomass yield by 72 % relative to calcium nitrate in sand.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
AN and ASe5
Outcome
biomass yielde5
Direction
increasede5
Value
72 %e5
Qualifier
sand soil texturee5
Comparator
CN fertilizere5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“AN and AS increased biomass yield, Mn 2+ availability, and shoot concentration by 72 %, 30 %, and 46 %, respectively, in relation to the CN fertilizer in the sand soil texture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1707–1882 · show in text ↑
t0

“shoot concentrations in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium nitrate and ammonium sulphate increased Mn2+ availability by 30 % relative to calcium nitrate in sand.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
AN and ASe5
Compound
Mn 2+e5
Outcome
Mn 2+ availabilitye5
Direction
increasede5
Value
30 %e5
Qualifier
sand soil texturee5
Comparator
CN fertilizere5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“AN and AS increased biomass yield, Mn 2+ availability, and shoot concentration by 72 %, 30 %, and 46 %, respectively, in relation to the CN fertilizer in the sand soil texture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1707–1882 · show in text ↑
t0

“shoot concentrations in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium nitrate and ammonium sulphate increased shoot Mn2+ concentration by 46 % relative to calcium nitrate in sand.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
AN and ASe5
Compound
Mn 2+e5
Outcome
shoot concentratione5
Direction
increasede5
Value
46 %e5
Qualifier
sand soil texturee5
Comparator
CN fertilizere5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“AN and AS increased biomass yield, Mn 2+ availability, and shoot concentration by 72 %, 30 %, and 46 %, respectively, in relation to the CN fertilizer in the sand soil texture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1707–1882 · show in text ↑
t0

“shoot concentrations in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–88 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DMPP-induced rhizosphere acidification enhanced Mn2+ and P shoot concentrations in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
DMPP-induced rhizosphere acidificatione6
Outcome
Mn 2+ and P shoot concentratione6
Qualifier
loamy sand soil texturese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“this study confirmed the effectiveness of DMPP-induced rhizosphere acidification in enhancing Mn 2+ and P shoot concentration in loamy sand soil textures, as well as P shoot concentration in fine-textured soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1899–2108 · show in text ↑
t0

“shoot concentrations in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–88 · show in text ↑

ammonium sulfate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

37 papers: 31 positive, 6 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

ammonium sulfate · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

ammonium nitrate · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

ammonium nitrate · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

ammonium sulfate · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

ammonium nitrate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 20 positive, 3 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.