Paper · 2024 · Agronomy

Effects of Nutrient Deficiency on Crop Yield and Soil Nutrients Under Winter Wheat–Summer Maize Rotation System in the North China Plain

Zheng Sun; Rulan Yang; Jie Wang; et al.

13
claims
27
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The wheat–maize rotation system in the North China Plain (NCP) has a large amount of crop straw. However, improper crop straw management and blind fertilization lead to nutrient imbalance and accelerated nutrient loss from the soil, ultimately leading to nutrient deficiency affecting the wheat–maize rotation system. In order to explore the effects of nutrient deficiency on the yield and nutrient use efficiency of wheat and maize, the experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design consisting of five treatments with three replicates for each treatment: (1) a potassium fertilizer deficiency and appropriate nitrogen and phosphate fertilizer treatment (NP); (2) a phosphate fertilizer deficiency and appropriate nitrogen and potassium fertilizer treatment (NK); (3) a nitrogen fertilizer deficiency and appropriate phosphate and potassium fertilizer treatment (PK); (4) an adequate nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilizer treatment (NPK); and (5) a no-fertilizer treatment (CK). The results showed that, compared with CK, the yields of wheat and maize treated with NPK were increased by 21.5% and 27.5%, respectively, and the accumulation of the dry matter of the wheat and maize was increased by 42.5% and 57.3%. In all the deficiency treatments, the NK treatment performed better in terms of yield compared to the NP and PK treatments, while the NP treatment demonstrated a greater increase in dry matter accumulation. The NPK treatment significantly improved the nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and nitrogen harvest index (NHI) of the wheat and maize, which resulted in higher nitrogen accumulation in the NPK treatment, and the NP treatment was the best among the other nutrient deficiency treatments. The inorganic nitrogen content showed a similar trend. In conclusion, nutrient deficiency can severely restrict crop growth. Nitrogen deficiency can significantly reduce crop yields. Phosphorus deficiency had a greater impact than potassium deficiency in terms of nutrient absorption and accumulation. Therefore, nitrogen fertilizer application should be emphasized in crop rotation systems, with moderate increases in phosphorus fertilizer application. This practice can effectively improve the nutrient deficiency under the wheat and maize rotation system in the NCP and complete a rational fertilization system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK increased wheat yield by 21.5% relative to no fertilizer.

Treatment
NPKe0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
21.5%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared with CK, the yields of wheat and maize treated with NPK were increased by 21.5% and 27.5%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK increased maize yield by 27.5% relative to no fertilizer.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
NPKe0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
27.5%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared with CK, the yields of wheat and maize treated with NPK were increased by 21.5% and 27.5%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK increased wheat dry matter accumulation by 42.5%.

Treatment
NPKe1
Outcome
accumulation of the dry mattere0
Direction
increasede0
Value
42.5%e0
Comparator
CKe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the accumulation of the dry matter of the wheat and maize was increased by 42.5% and 57.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1238 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nutrient Deficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–30 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with CK, the yields of wheat and maize treated with NPK were increased by 21.5% and 27.5%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK increased maize dry matter accumulation by 57.3%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
accumulation of the dry mattere0
Direction
increasede0
Value
57.3%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the accumulation of the dry matter of the wheat and maize was increased by 42.5% and 57.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1238 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NK gave higher yield than NP and PK among deficiency treatments.

Taxon
wheat and maizeTriticum aestivumZea mayse1
Treatment
NKe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
NP and PK treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the NK treatment performed better in terms of yield compared to the NP and PK treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1362 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat–Summer Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“yields of wheat and maize treated with NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1094 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NP gave greater dry matter accumulation among deficiency treatments.

Taxon
wheat and maizeTriticum aestivumZea mayse1
Treatment
NPe0
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
greater increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the NP treatment demonstrated a greater increase in dry matter accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1445 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat–Summer Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“yields of wheat and maize treated with NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1094 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK significantly improved wheat and maize nitrogen use efficiency and nitrogen harvest index.

Taxon
wheat and maizeTriticum aestivumZea mayse0
Treatment
NPKe0
Outcome
nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and nitrogen harvest index (NHI)e0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The NPK treatment significantly improved the nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and nitrogen harvest index (NHI) of the wheat and maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1447–1577 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK produced higher nitrogen accumulation.

Taxon
wheat and maizeTriticum aestivumZea mayse1
Treatment
NPKe0
Outcome
nitrogen accumulatione0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher nitrogen accumulation in the NPK treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1597–1646 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat–Summer Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“yields of wheat and maize treated with NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1094 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NP performed best among nutrient deficiency treatments for nitrogen use.

Taxon
wheat and maizeTriticum aestivumZea mayse1
Treatment
NPe0
Outcome
beste0
Direction
beste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the NP treatment was the best among the other nutrient deficiency treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1652–1728 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat–Summer Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“yields of wheat and maize treated with NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1094 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic nitrogen content showed a similar trend.

Outcome
inorganic nitrogen contente0
Direction
similar trende0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The inorganic nitrogen content showed a similar trend.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1730–1784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen deficiency significantly reduced crop yields.

Taxon
crope0
Treatment
Nitrogen deficiencye0
Outcome
crop yieldse0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen deficiency can significantly reduce crop yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1855–1912 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus deficiency affected nutrient absorption and accumulation more than potassium deficiency.

Taxon
wheat and maizeTriticum aestivumZea mayse1
Treatment
Phosphorus deficiencye0
Outcome
nutrient absorption and accumulatione0
Direction
greater impacte0
Comparator
potassium deficiencye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus deficiency had a greater impact than potassium deficiency in terms of nutrient absorption and accumulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1913–2031 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat–Summer Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“yields of wheat and maize treated with NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1094 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend emphasizing nitrogen fertilizer and moderately increasing phosphorus in crop rotation.

Taxon
wheat and maizeTriticum aestivumZea mayse1
Outcome
nitrogen fertilizer application should be emphasized in crop rotation systems, with moderate increases in phosphorus fertilizer applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen fertilizer application should be emphasized in crop rotation systems, with moderate increases in phosphorus fertilizer application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2043–2183 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat–Summer Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“yields of wheat and maize treated with NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1094 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

189 papers: 174 positive, 15 negative or no effect

173 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

185 papers more in this group

See all 189 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

176 papers: 142 positive, 34 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

172 papers more in this group

See all 176 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

226 papers: 198 positive, 28 negative or no effect

197 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

222 papers more in this group

See all 226 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

233 papers: 215 positive, 18 negative or no effect

214 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

229 papers more in this group

See all 233 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

244 papers: 190 positive, 54 negative or no effect

189 papers in the same direction as this paper · 50 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

240 papers more in this group

See all 244 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

260 papers: 242 positive, 18 negative or no effect

241 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

256 papers more in this group

See all 260 papers →

fertilization · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

755 papers: 663 positive, 92 negative or no effect

662 papers in the same direction as this paper · 89 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

751 papers more in this group

See all 755 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.