Paper · 2025 · Horticulturae

Yield, Quality, Antioxidants, and Mineral Composition of Traditional Italian Storage Onion Cultivars in Response to Protein Hydrolysate and Microalgae Biostimulation

Alessio Vincenzo Tallarita; Otilia Cristina Murariu; Tomas Kopta; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Increasing interest is being devoted to environmentally friendly strategies, such as the use of plant biostimulants, to enhance crop performance and concurrently ensure food security under the perspective of sustainable management. The effects of two biostimulant formulations (protein hydrolysate and spirulina) on four Italian traditional storage onion cultivars (Ramata di Montoro, Rossa di Tropea, Rocca Bruna, Dorata di Parma) were investigated in Naples province (southern Italy), in terms of yield, quality, shelf-life, bioactive compounds, and mineral composition. Ramata di Montoro showed the highest levels of yield (66.4 t ha−1) and vitamin C (31.5 mg g−1 d.w.) and the longest shelf-life (228 days). Significant increases in marketable yield were recorded under the applications of both protein hydrolysate (+15.5%) and spirulina (+12.4%) compared to the untreated control. The two biostimulant formulations significantly increased bulb shelf-life and the contents of polyphenols (201.4 mg gallic acid eq. 100 g−1 d.w. on average vs. 158.6 of the untreated control), vitamin C (26.8 mg g−1 d.w. on average vs. 22), and both lipophilic and hydrophilic antioxidant activities. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of both protein hydrolysate and spirulina as sustainable tools for enhancing both yield and quality parameters within the frame of environmentally friendly farming management.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ramata di Montoro had the highest yield, 66.4 t ha−1.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Material
Ramata di Montoroe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
66.4 t ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ramata di Montoro showed the highest levels of yield (66.4 t ha−1) and vitamin C (31.5 mg g−1 d.w.) and the longest shelf-life (228 days).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–711 · show in text ↑
t0

“Storage Onion Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–100 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ramata di Montoro had the highest vitamin C, 31.5 mg g−1 d.w.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Material
Ramata di Montoroe0
Outcome
vitamin Ce0
Direction
higheste0
Value
31.5 mg g−1 d.w.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ramata di Montoro showed the highest levels of yield (66.4 t ha−1) and vitamin C (31.5 mg g−1 d.w.) and the longest shelf-life (228 days).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–711 · show in text ↑
t0

“Storage Onion Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–100 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ramata di Montoro had the longest shelf-life, 228 days.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Material
Ramata di Montoroe0
Outcome
shelf-lifee0
Direction
longeste0
Value
228 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ramata di Montoro showed the highest levels of yield (66.4 t ha−1) and vitamin C (31.5 mg g−1 d.w.) and the longest shelf-life (228 days).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–711 · show in text ↑
t0

“Storage Onion Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein hydrolysate increased marketable yield 15.5% versus untreated control.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
protein hydrolysatee0
Outcome
marketable yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
+15.5%e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant increases in marketable yield were recorded under the applications of both protein hydrolysate (+15.5%) and spirulina (+12.4%) compared to the untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–885 · show in text ↑
t0

“Storage Onion Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spirulina increased marketable yield 12.4% versus untreated control.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
spirulinae0
Outcome
marketable yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
+12.4%e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant increases in marketable yield were recorded under the applications of both protein hydrolysate (+15.5%) and spirulina (+12.4%) compared to the untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–885 · show in text ↑
t0

“Storage Onion Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both formulations increased bulb shelf life.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
two biostimulant formulationse0
Outcome
bulb shelf-lifee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The two biostimulant formulations significantly increased bulb shelf-life and the contents of polyphenols (201.4 mg gallic acid eq. 100 g−1 d.w. on average vs. 158.6 of the untreated control), vitamin C (26.8 mg g−1 d.w. on average vs. 22), and both lipophilic and hydrophilic antioxidant activities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“Storage Onion Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both formulations increased polyphenol content to 201.4 mg gallic acid eq. 100 g−1 d.w. on average.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
two biostimulant formulationse0
Outcome
contents of polyphenolse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
201.4 mg gallic acid eq. 100 g−1 d.w.e0
Qualifier
158.6e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The two biostimulant formulations significantly increased bulb shelf-life and the contents of polyphenols (201.4 mg gallic acid eq. 100 g−1 d.w. on average vs. 158.6 of the untreated control), vitamin C (26.8 mg g−1 d.w. on average vs. 22), and both lipophilic and hydrophilic antioxidant activities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“Storage Onion Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both formulations increased vitamin C content to 26.8 mg g−1 d.w. on average.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
two biostimulant formulationse0
Outcome
vitamin Ce0
Direction
increasede0
Value
26.8 mg g−1 d.w.e0
Qualifier
22e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The two biostimulant formulations significantly increased bulb shelf-life and the contents of polyphenols (201.4 mg gallic acid eq. 100 g−1 d.w. on average vs. 158.6 of the untreated control), vitamin C (26.8 mg g−1 d.w. on average vs. 22), and both lipophilic and hydrophilic antioxidant activities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“Storage Onion Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both formulations increased lipophilic and hydrophilic antioxidant activities.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
two biostimulant formulationse0
Outcome
lipophilic and hydrophilic antioxidant activitiese0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The two biostimulant formulations significantly increased bulb shelf-life and the contents of polyphenols (201.4 mg gallic acid eq. 100 g−1 d.w. on average vs. 158.6 of the untreated control), vitamin C (26.8 mg g−1 d.w. on average vs. 22), and both lipophilic and hydrophilic antioxidant activities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“Storage Onion Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–100 · show in text ↑

other · molecular: metabolites · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

other · quality: postharvest · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

other · quality: phytochemicals · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.