Paper · 2025 · Tree Physiology

Transcriptomic analysis reveals potential roles of polyamine and proline metabolism in waterlogged peach roots inoculated with Funneliformis mosseae and Serendipita indica

Sheng-Min Liang; Abeer Hashem; Elsayed Fathi Abd_Allah; et al.

18
claims
54
verbatim quotes
19
citations
5
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Root-associated endophytic fungi can create symbiotic relationships with trees to enhance stress tolerance, but the underlying mechanisms, especially with regard to waterlogging tolerance, remain unclear. This study aimed to elucidate the effects of Funneliformis mosseae and Serendipita indica on the growth, root cross-section structure, and root transcriptional responses of peach under waterlogging stress, with a focus on polyamine and proline metabolism. Genes and transcription factors associated with secondary cell wall biosynthesis were selected, and their expression profiles were analyzed. Funneliformis mosseae significantly increased the height, stem diameter and leaf number of peach seedlings subjected to 2 weeks of waterlogging stress, whereas S. indica only significantly improved stem diameter. Both fungal species substantially increased root diameter, stele diameter, the number of late metaxylem inside the stele and late metaxylem diameter, thus improving aeration within inoculated roots under waterlogging stress. Transcriptomic analysis of waterlogged roots identified 5425 and 5646 differentially expressed genes following inoculation with F. mosseae and S. indica, respectively. The arginine and proline metabolism and arginine biosynthesis pathways were enriched following fungal inoculations. Both fungi reduced the conversion of glutamate and ornithine for proline synthesis. However, S. indica promoted peptide-to-proline conversion by up-regulating the expression of PIPs. Although both fungi promoted the expression of genes involved in arginine and ornithine synthesis pathway, only F. mosseae led to increased levels of arginine and ornithine. Additionally, F. mosseae promoted the accumulation of putrescine and maintained polyamine homeostasis by down-regulating PAO2 and SAMDC. Moreover, F. mosseae facilitated the metabolism of cadaverine. In conclusion, both F. mosseae and S. indica formed symbiotic relationships with peach plants, with F. mosseae primarily improving polyamine accumulation and S. indica predominantly facilitating proline accumulation for enhanced waterlogging resistance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed public-domain. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Funneliformis mosseae significantly increased height, stem diameter and leaf number of waterlogged peach seedlings.

Treatment
Funneliformis mosseaee0
Interactor
Funneliformis mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
height, stem diameter and leaf numbere0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Funneliformis mosseae significantly increased the height, stem diameter and leaf number of peach seedlings subjected to 2 weeks of waterlogging stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–752 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–104 · show in text ↑
t1

“Funneliformis mosseae and Serendipita indica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–171 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

S. indica significantly improved stem diameter of waterlogged peach seedlings.

Treatment
S. indicae0
Interactor
S. indicaSerendipita indicae0symbiont
Outcome
stem diametere0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“whereas S. indica only significantly improved stem diameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–813 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–104 · show in text ↑
t1

“Funneliformis mosseae and Serendipita indica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–171 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Funneliformis mosseae increased root and stele diameters and late metaxylem number and diameter in waterlogged peach.

Treatment
Funneliformis mosseaet1
Interactor
Funneliformis mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaet1symbiont
Outcome
root diameter, stele diameter, the number of late metaxylem inside the stelee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both fungal species substantially increased root diameter, stele diameter, the number of late metaxylem inside the stele and late metaxylem diameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–963 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–104 · show in text ↑
t1

“Funneliformis mosseae and Serendipita indica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–171 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Serendipita indica increased root and stele diameters and late metaxylem number and diameter in waterlogged peach.

Treatment
Serendipita indicat1
Interactor
Serendipita indicaSerendipita indicat1symbiont
Outcome
root diameter, stele diameter, the number of late metaxylem inside the stelee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both fungal species substantially increased root diameter, stele diameter, the number of late metaxylem inside the stele and late metaxylem diameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–963 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–104 · show in text ↑
t1

“Funneliformis mosseae and Serendipita indica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–171 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal changes to peach root anatomy improved aeration under waterlogging.

Outcome
aeration within inoculated rootse0
Qualifier
under waterlogging stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“thus improving aeration within inoculated roots under waterlogging stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1038 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–104 · show in text ↑
t1

“Funneliformis mosseae and Serendipita indica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–171 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F. mosseae inoculation yielded 5425 differentially expressed genes in waterlogged peach roots.

Treatment
F. mosseaee0
Interactor
F. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
differentially expressed genese0
Value
5425e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Transcriptomic analysis of waterlogged roots identified 5425 and 5646 differentially expressed genes following inoculation with F. mosseae and S. indica, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1206 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–104 · show in text ↑
t1

“Funneliformis mosseae and Serendipita indica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–171 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. indica inoculation yielded 5646 differentially expressed genes in waterlogged peach roots.

Treatment
S. indicae0
Interactor
S. indicaSerendipita indicae0symbiont
Outcome
differentially expressed genese0
Value
5646e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Transcriptomic analysis of waterlogged roots identified 5425 and 5646 differentially expressed genes following inoculation with F. mosseae and S. indica, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1206 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–104 · show in text ↑
t1

“Funneliformis mosseae and Serendipita indica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–171 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arginine and proline metabolism and arginine biosynthesis pathways were enriched after fungal inoculation.

Outcome
arginine and proline metabolism and arginine biosynthesis pathwayse0
Direction
enrichede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The arginine and proline metabolism and arginine biosynthesis pathways were enriched following fungal inoculations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1322 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–104 · show in text ↑
t1

“Funneliformis mosseae and Serendipita indica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–171 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both fungi reduced conversion of glutamate and ornithine for proline synthesis.

Outcome
conversion of glutamate and ornithine for proline synthesise0
Direction
reducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both fungi reduced the conversion of glutamate and ornithine for proline synthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1406 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–104 · show in text ↑
t1

“Funneliformis mosseae and Serendipita indica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–171 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. indica promoted peptide-to-proline conversion through increased PIPs expression.

Interactor
S. indicaSerendipita indicae0symbiont
Gene
PIPse0
Outcome
peptide-to-proline conversione0
Direction
promotede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S. indica promoted peptide-to-proline conversion by up-regulating the expression of PIPs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1417–1505 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–104 · show in text ↑
t1

“Funneliformis mosseae and Serendipita indica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–171 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both fungi promoted expression of arginine and ornithine synthesis genes.

Outcome
expression of genes involved in arginine and ornithine synthesis pathwaye0
Direction
promotede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both fungi promoted the expression of genes involved in arginine and ornithine synthesis pathway”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1516–1612 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–104 · show in text ↑
t1

“Funneliformis mosseae and Serendipita indica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–171 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only F. mosseae increased arginine and ornithine levels.

Interactor
F. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
levels of arginine and ornithinee0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only F. mosseae led to increased levels of arginine and ornithine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1614–1679 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–104 · show in text ↑
t1

“Funneliformis mosseae and Serendipita indica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–171 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F. mosseae promoted putrescine accumulation.

Interactor
F. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
accumulation of putrescinee0
Direction
promotede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“F. mosseae promoted the accumulation of putrescine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1695–1745 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–104 · show in text ↑
t1

“Funneliformis mosseae and Serendipita indica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–171 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F. mosseae maintained polyamine homeostasis by down-regulating PAO2 and SAMDC.

Gene
PAO2 and SAMDCe0
Outcome
polyamine homeostasise0
Qualifier
down-regulating PAO2 and SAMDCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maintained polyamine homeostasis by down-regulating PAO2 and SAMDC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1750–1816 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–104 · show in text ↑
t1

“Funneliformis mosseae and Serendipita indica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–171 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F. mosseae facilitated cadaverine metabolism.

Interactor
F. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
metabolism of cadaverinee0
Direction
facilitatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“F. mosseae facilitated the metabolism of cadaverine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1828–1879 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–104 · show in text ↑
t1

“Funneliformis mosseae and Serendipita indica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–171 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both fungi formed symbiotic relationships with peach.

Interactor
F. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Second interactor
S. indicaSerendipita indicae0symbiont
Outcome
symbiotic relationships with peach plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both F. mosseae and S. indica formed symbiotic relationships with peach plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1896–1974 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–104 · show in text ↑
t1

“Funneliformis mosseae and Serendipita indica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–171 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F. mosseae primarily improved polyamine accumulation for waterlogging resistance.

Interactor
F. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
polyamine accumulatione0
Direction
improvinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“F. mosseae primarily improving polyamine accumulation and S. indica predominantly facilitating proline accumulation for enhanced waterlogging resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1981–2133 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–104 · show in text ↑
t1

“Funneliformis mosseae and Serendipita indica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–171 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. indica predominantly facilitated proline accumulation for waterlogging resistance.

Interactor
S. indicaSerendipita indicae0symbiont
Outcome
proline accumulatione0
Direction
facilitatinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S. indica predominantly facilitating proline accumulation for enhanced waterlogging resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2039–2133 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–104 · show in text ↑
t1

“Funneliformis mosseae and Serendipita indica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–171 · show in text ↑

Funneliformis mosseae · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.