Paper · 2024 · Vegetable Science

Evaluation of chemical and non-chemical weed control methods in onion: An integrated weed management approach

Pattipaka Bhasker; Pramod Kumar Gupta; Satendra Singh; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

An integrated weed management experiment was conducted to compare the efficacy of chemical and non-chemical weed management methods in onion under the All India Network Research Project on Onion and Garlic. The three-year combined results revealed that all the weed management methods significantly influenced weed density. The lowest monocot, dicot, total weed population, weed biomass and highest weed control efficiency were recorded in treatment Plastic mulch. The highest bulb equatorial diameter (5.87 cm), polar diameter (4.32 cm), gross yield (317.63 q/ha) and marketable yield (267.34 q/ha) were recorded in treatment Plastic mulch. However, the highest benefit: cost ratio (2.89:1.0) was recorded in herbicidal treatment oxyflurofen 23.5% EC @ 1.5 mL/l at pre-transplanting + one hand weeding at 30 DAT + Quizalofop Ethyl 5% EC application at 60 DAT. Due to heavy infestation of weed competition, poor growth and development were recorded in treatment un-weed check results 49.0 to 88.80% yield reduction.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All weed management methods significantly influenced weed density in onion over three years of combined results.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
weed management methodse1
Outcome
weed densitye1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“methods in onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 124–140 · show in text ↑
e1

“all the weed management methods significantly influenced weed density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–322 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulch gave the lowest monocot, dicot and total weed population in onion.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
Plastic mulche1
Outcome
monocot, dicot, total weed populatione1
Direction
loweste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“methods in onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 124–140 · show in text ↑
e1

“The lowest monocot, dicot, total weed population, weed biomass and highest weed control efficiency were recorded in treatment Plastic mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–463 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulch gave the lowest weed biomass in onion.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
Plastic mulche1
Outcome
weed biomasse1
Direction
loweste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“methods in onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 124–140 · show in text ↑
e1

“The lowest monocot, dicot, total weed population, weed biomass and highest weed control efficiency were recorded in treatment Plastic mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–463 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulch gave the highest weed control efficiency in onion.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
Plastic mulche1
Outcome
weed control efficiencye1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“methods in onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 124–140 · show in text ↑
e1

“The lowest monocot, dicot, total weed population, weed biomass and highest weed control efficiency were recorded in treatment Plastic mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–463 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulch gave the highest bulb equatorial diameter, 5.87 cm, in onion.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
Plastic mulche1
Outcome
bulb equatorial diametere1
Direction
higheste1
Value
5.87 cme1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“methods in onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 124–140 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest bulb equatorial diameter (5.87 cm), polar diameter (4.32 cm), gross yield (317.63 q/ha) and marketable yield (267.34 q/ha) were recorded in treatment Plastic mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–640 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulch gave the highest bulb polar diameter, 4.32 cm, in onion.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
Plastic mulche1
Outcome
polar diametere1
Direction
higheste1
Value
4.32 cme1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“methods in onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 124–140 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest bulb equatorial diameter (5.87 cm), polar diameter (4.32 cm), gross yield (317.63 q/ha) and marketable yield (267.34 q/ha) were recorded in treatment Plastic mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–640 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulch gave the highest gross yield, 317.63 q/ha, in onion.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
Plastic mulche1
Outcome
gross yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
317.63 q/hae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“methods in onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 124–140 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest bulb equatorial diameter (5.87 cm), polar diameter (4.32 cm), gross yield (317.63 q/ha) and marketable yield (267.34 q/ha) were recorded in treatment Plastic mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–640 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulch gave the highest marketable yield, 267.34 q/ha, in onion.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
Plastic mulche1
Outcome
marketable yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
267.34 q/hae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“methods in onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 124–140 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest bulb equatorial diameter (5.87 cm), polar diameter (4.32 cm), gross yield (317.63 q/ha) and marketable yield (267.34 q/ha) were recorded in treatment Plastic mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–640 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest benefit:cost ratio, 2.89:1.0, in onion was in the herbicide treatment of oxyfluorfen pre-transplanting plus one hand weeding at 30 DAT plus quizalofop-ethyl at 60 DAT.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
herbicidal treatment oxyflurofen 23.5% EC @ 1.5 mL/l at pre-transplanting + one hand weeding at 30 DAT + Quizalofop Ethyl 5% EC application at 60 DATe1
Outcome
benefit: cost ratioe1
Direction
higheste1
Value
2.89:1.0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“methods in onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 124–140 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest benefit: cost ratio (2.89:1.0) was recorded in herbicidal treatment oxyflurofen 23.5% EC @ 1.5 mL/l at pre-transplanting + one hand weeding at 30 DAT + Quizalofop Ethyl 5% EC application at 60 DAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–859 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heavy weed competition in the un-weeded check caused 49.0 to 88.80% yield reduction in onion.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
yield reductione1
Value
49.0 to 88.80%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“methods in onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 124–140 · show in text ↑
e1

“Due to heavy infestation of weed competition, poor growth and development were recorded in treatment un-weed check results 49.0 to 88.80% yield reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–1014 · show in text ↑

quizalofop-ethyl · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

mulching · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

50 papers: 43 positive, 7 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

herbicide · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

88 papers: 75 positive, 13 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

84 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

mulching · quality: postharvest · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

mulching · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 16 positive, 5 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

mulching · weed · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.