Paper · 2025 · PLANT ARCHIVES

EFFECT OF VARIOUS LEVEL OF NITROGEN AND SULPHUR ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF LATE SOWN WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)

4
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

of Agriculture, Tantia University, Sri Ganganagar in Factorial Randomized Block Design (FRBD) with three levels of nitrogen viz., 80, 100, and 120 kg/ha, and three levels of Sulphur viz., 20, 25, and 30 kg/ha.The experimental results revealed that nitrogen and Sulphur application significantly influence plant growth, yield attributes, and yield as well as economic of wheat cultivation.The significantly higher plant height, No. of leaves plant -1 and maximum No. of tillers per running meter and plant dry weight at 90 DAS as well as maximum Leaf Area Index of wheat were recorded with treatment combination of N 3 S 3 (120 kg Nitrogen ha -1 + 30 kg Sulphur ha -1 ).The significantly higher effective tillers, grains spike -1 and test weight (g) were recorded with treatment combination of N 3 S 3 (120 kg Nitrogen ha -1 + 30 kg Sulphur ha -1 ).Similarly, the significantly higher number of effective tillers per m 2 , grain, straw and biological yield were recorded with treatment combination of N 3 S 3 (120 kg Nitrogen ha -1 + 30 kg Sulphur ha -1 ).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N3S3 gave significantly higher plant height, leaf number and tillers.

Treatment
N 3 S 3 (120 kg Nitrogen ha -1 + 30 kg Sulphur ha -1 )e0
Outcome
plant height, No. of leaves plant -1 and maximum No. of tillers per running metere0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The significantly higher plant height, No. of leaves plant -1 and maximum No. of tillers per running meter and plant dry weight at 90 DAS as well as maximum Leaf Area Index of wheat were recorded with treatment combination of N 3 S 3 (120 kg Nitrogen ha -1 + 30 kg Sulphur ha -1 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–669 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N3S3 gave maximum plant dry weight and leaf area index.

Treatment
N 3 S 3 (120 kg Nitrogen ha -1 + 30 kg Sulphur ha -1 )e0
Outcome
plant dry weight at 90 DAS as well as maximum Leaf Area Indexe0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The significantly higher plant height, No. of leaves plant -1 and maximum No. of tillers per running meter and plant dry weight at 90 DAS as well as maximum Leaf Area Index of wheat were recorded with treatment combination of N 3 S 3 (120 kg Nitrogen ha -1 + 30 kg Sulphur ha -1 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–669 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N3S3 gave significantly higher effective tillers, grains per spike and test weight.

Treatment
N 3 S 3 (120 kg Nitrogen ha -1 + 30 kg Sulphur ha -1 )e0
Outcome
effective tillers, grains spike -1 and test weight (g)e0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The significantly higher effective tillers, grains spike -1 and test weight (g) were recorded with treatment combination of N 3 S 3 (120 kg Nitrogen ha -1 + 30 kg Sulphur ha -1 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–848 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N3S3 gave significantly higher grain, straw and biological yield.

Treatment
N 3 S 3 (120 kg Nitrogen ha -1 + 30 kg Sulphur ha -1 )e0
Outcome
grain, straw and biological yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the significantly higher number of effective tillers per m 2 , grain, straw and biological yield were recorded with treatment combination of N 3 S 3 (120 kg Nitrogen ha -1 + 30 kg Sulphur ha -1 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–1055 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

148 papers: 124 positive, 24 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

144 papers more in this group

See all 148 papers →

sulfur atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 31 positive, 2 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

sulfur atom · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

nitrogen · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

96 papers: 70 positive, 26 negative or no effect

69 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

92 papers more in this group

See all 96 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

551 papers: 426 positive, 125 negative or no effect

425 papers in the same direction as this paper · 116 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

547 papers more in this group

See all 551 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.