Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Effect of agronomic practices on growth, yield and quality parameters of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) under open field conditions

M Kabilan; P Janani; L Sowmiya; et al.

10
claims
26
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) is a high-value horticultural crop cultivated extensively across diverse agro-climatic regions. Its productivity and quality are greatly influenced by agronomic practices such as plant spacing, irrigation scheduling, and nutrient management. This study was conducted to assess the combined effects of different spacing (50 × 50 cm, 60 × 60 cm, and 75 × 60 cm), irrigation intervals (every 3 days and every 5 days), and fertilization regimes (100% recommended dose of fertilizers [RDF], 50% RDF + 10 t/ha FYM, and FYM @ 20 t/ha) on the growth, yield, and quality of tomato under open field conditions. The experiment was laid out in a Randomized Block Design with factorial arrangement and three replications using tomato cultivar ‘Arka Rakshak’. Results revealed that the treatment combination of 60 × 60 cm spacing, irrigation every 3 days, and 50% RDF + FYM (10 t/ha) significantly enhanced plant height (85.3 cm), number of branches (8.4), fruit yield (48.2 t/ha), and average fruit weight (84.6 g). This combination also improved fruit quality, with lycopene content of 7.2 mg/100g fresh weight, TSS of 4.6 °Brix, and titratable acidity of 0.45%. The integrated nutrient management approach proved superior in promoting both productivity and nutritional attributes of tomato. Significant interaction effects among spacing, irrigation, and fertilization highlight the importance of adopting a combined agronomic strategy rather than modifying single factors in isolation. The study concludes that integrated agronomic management involving moderate spacing, timely irrigation, and combined organic-inorganic fertilization offers a sustainable approach for improving tomato yield and quality. These findings provide valuable insights for farmers and researchers aiming to optimize tomato cultivation in open-field conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 60 x 60 cm spacing, 3-day irrigation, 50% RDF + 10 t/ha FYM combination significantly enhanced tomato plant height to 85.3 cm.

Treatment
60 × 60 cm spacing, irrigation every 3 days, and 50% RDF + FYM (10 t/ha)e0
Outcome
plant heighte1
Direction
enhancede1
Value
85.3 cme1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“the treatment combination of 60 × 60 cm spacing, irrigation every 3 days, and 50% RDF + FYM (10 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–902 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly enhanced plant height (85.3 cm), number of branches (8.4), fruit yield (48.2 t/ha), and average fruit weight (84.6 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1034 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same combination significantly enhanced the number of branches (8.4).

Treatment
60 × 60 cm spacing, irrigation every 3 days, and 50% RDF + FYM (10 t/ha)e0
Outcome
number of branchese1
Direction
enhancede1
Value
8.4e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“the treatment combination of 60 × 60 cm spacing, irrigation every 3 days, and 50% RDF + FYM (10 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–902 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly enhanced plant height (85.3 cm), number of branches (8.4), fruit yield (48.2 t/ha), and average fruit weight (84.6 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1034 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same combination significantly enhanced fruit yield (48.2 t/ha).

Treatment
60 × 60 cm spacing, irrigation every 3 days, and 50% RDF + FYM (10 t/ha)e0
Outcome
fruit yielde1
Direction
enhancede1
Value
48.2 t/hae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“the treatment combination of 60 × 60 cm spacing, irrigation every 3 days, and 50% RDF + FYM (10 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–902 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly enhanced plant height (85.3 cm), number of branches (8.4), fruit yield (48.2 t/ha), and average fruit weight (84.6 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1034 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same combination significantly enhanced average fruit weight (84.6 g).

Treatment
60 × 60 cm spacing, irrigation every 3 days, and 50% RDF + FYM (10 t/ha)e0
Outcome
average fruit weighte1
Direction
enhancede1
Value
84.6 ge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“the treatment combination of 60 × 60 cm spacing, irrigation every 3 days, and 50% RDF + FYM (10 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–902 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly enhanced plant height (85.3 cm), number of branches (8.4), fruit yield (48.2 t/ha), and average fruit weight (84.6 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1034 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination improved fruit lycopene content to 7.2 mg/100g fresh weight.

Treatment
60 × 60 cm spacing, irrigation every 3 days, and 50% RDF + FYM (10 t/ha)e0
Outcome
lycopene contente1
Direction
improvede1
Value
7.2 mg/100g fresh weighte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“the treatment combination of 60 × 60 cm spacing, irrigation every 3 days, and 50% RDF + FYM (10 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–902 · show in text ↑
e1

“improved fruit quality, with lycopene content of 7.2 mg/100g fresh weight, TSS of 4.6 °Brix, and titratable acidity of 0.45%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1182 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination improved fruit TSS to 4.6 degrees Brix.

Treatment
60 × 60 cm spacing, irrigation every 3 days, and 50% RDF + FYM (10 t/ha)e0
Outcome
TSSe1
Direction
improvede1
Value
4.6 °Brixe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“the treatment combination of 60 × 60 cm spacing, irrigation every 3 days, and 50% RDF + FYM (10 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–902 · show in text ↑
e1

“improved fruit quality, with lycopene content of 7.2 mg/100g fresh weight, TSS of 4.6 °Brix, and titratable acidity of 0.45%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1182 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination improved fruit titratable acidity to 0.45%.

Treatment
60 × 60 cm spacing, irrigation every 3 days, and 50% RDF + FYM (10 t/ha)e0
Outcome
titratable aciditye1
Direction
improvede1
Value
0.45%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“the treatment combination of 60 × 60 cm spacing, irrigation every 3 days, and 50% RDF + FYM (10 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–902 · show in text ↑
e1

“improved fruit quality, with lycopene content of 7.2 mg/100g fresh weight, TSS of 4.6 °Brix, and titratable acidity of 0.45%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1182 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated nutrient management approach proved superior in promoting tomato productivity and nutritional attributes.

Treatment
integrated nutrient management approache0
Outcome
productivity and nutritional attributese0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“The integrated nutrient management approach proved superior in promoting both productivity and nutritional attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1301 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing, irrigation and fertilization had significant interaction effects on tomato performance.

Treatment
spacing, irrigation, and fertilizatione0
Outcome
interaction effectse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“Significant interaction effects among spacing, irrigation, and fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1389 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated agronomic management with moderate spacing, timely irrigation and combined organic-inorganic fertilization is recommended for improving tomato yield and quality.

Outcome
improving tomato yield and qualitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“integrated agronomic management involving moderate spacing, timely irrigation, and combined organic-inorganic fertilization offers a sustainable approach for improving tomato yield and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1533–1725 · show in text ↑

density · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

density · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 14 positive, 3 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

irrigation · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 25 positive, 9 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

density · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

60 papers: 48 positive, 12 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

irrigation · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 46 positive, 17 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 129 positive, 15 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

140 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

171 papers: 155 positive, 16 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

167 papers more in this group

See all 171 papers →

irrigation · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

175 papers: 106 positive, 69 negative or no effect

105 papers in the same direction as this paper · 67 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

171 papers more in this group

See all 175 papers →

8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.