Paper · 2025 · Integrative plant biotechnology.

Determination of Acid Value and Saponification Number From In Vitro Callus Cultures of Olive (Olea europaea) cv. Koroneiki

Iqra Jamil; Muhammad Akram; Faheem Aftab

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Olive (Olea europaea L.). cv. Koroneiki belongs to the family Oleaceae, which is an evergreen plant of Mediterranean origin. Commonly, this plant is the source of olive oil used for various purposes in human life. To determine the biochemical characteristics of the extracted olive oil from specific callus lines of common olive, we investigated the effects of several hormones on callus induction from field-grown plants. Mature leaves, nodal, and internodal explants were surface-sterilized and inoculated on MS medium. Plant growth regulators in varying amounts were added to MS medium (2,4-D, BAP, IBA, NAA, or TDZ) alone or in combinations, forming a total of 29 treatments for callus induction. The highest (95.45%) callus induction was obtained with 8 + 2 µM BAP + IBA after 35 days of initial culture from leaf explants, followed by 6 µM 2,4-D (75.55%) under the dark culture room conditions. Internode was unable to form callus. Off white, yellowish, fluffy, friable, proliferating calluses were obtained from leaf explants. Such highly proliferating calluses were selected as callus cell lines (CL); CL1 (2, 4-D 4 µM) and CL2 (2, 4-D 6 µM) for oil extraction and subsequent biochemical characteristics of acid value and saponification number. Results demonstrated that CL1 showed the highest acid value (1.25) and saponification number (183). This was followed by CL2, which showed acid values of 1.42 and 1.84, and saponification values of 1.84 and 1.42, respectively. The present study demonstrated an efficient callus induction protocol for subsequent determination of biochemical attributes from the extracted oil of in vitro dedifferentiated olive tissues.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BAP plus IBA gave the highest leaf explant callus induction of 95.45%.

Taxon
OliveOlea europaeat0
Organ / stage
leaf explantse0
Treatment
8 + 2 µM BAP + IBAe0
Outcome
callus inductione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
95.45%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest (95.45%) callus induction was obtained with 8 + 2 µM BAP + IBA after 35 days of initial culture from leaf explants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–827 · show in text ↑
t0

“Olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

6 µM 2,4-D induced callus at 75.55% under dark conditions.

Taxon
OliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment
6 µM 2,4-De0
Outcome
callus inductione1
Value
75.55%e0
Setting
dark culture room conditionse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by 6 µM 2,4-D (75.55%) under the dark culture room conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–899 · show in text ↑
t0

“Olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–92 · show in text ↑
e1

“callus induction was obtained with 8 + 2 µM BAP + IBA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–775 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Internode explants did not form callus.

Taxon
OliveOlea europaeat0
Organ / stage
Internodee0
Outcome
unable to form calluse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Internode was unable to form callus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–937 · show in text ↑
t0

“Olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf explants produced off-white, yellowish, fluffy, friable, proliferating callus.

Taxon
OliveOlea europaeat0
Organ / stage
leaf explantse0
Outcome
Off white, yellowish, fluffy, friable, proliferating callusese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Off white, yellowish, fluffy, friable, proliferating calluses were obtained from leaf explants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1033 · show in text ↑
t0

“Olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CL1 had an acid value of 1.25, reported as highest.

Taxon
OliveOlea europaeat0
Material
CL1e0
Outcome
acid valuee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.25e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CL1 showed the highest acid value (1.25)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1319 · show in text ↑
t0

“Olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CL1 had a saponification number of 183.

Taxon
OliveOlea europaeat0
Material
CL1e0
Outcome
saponification numbere0
Value
183e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CL1 showed the highest acid value (1.25) and saponification number (183)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1351 · show in text ↑
t0

“Olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CL2 was reported with acid values of 1.42 and 1.84.

Taxon
OliveOlea europaeat0
Material
CL2e0
Outcome
acid valuese0
Value
1.42 and 1.84e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CL2, which showed acid values of 1.42 and 1.84”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1420 · show in text ↑
t0

“Olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CL2 was reported with saponification values of 1.84 and 1.42.

Taxon
OliveOlea europaeat0
Material
CL2e1
Outcome
saponification valuese0
Value
1.84 and 1.42e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“saponification values of 1.84 and 1.42”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1464 · show in text ↑
e1

“CL2, which showed acid values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1403 · show in text ↑
t0

“Olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–92 · show in text ↑

N-benzyladenine · growth · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

indole-3-butyric acid · growth · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 28 positive, 1 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

2,4-D · growth · Olea europaea (common olive)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.