Intervention effectmodel-written summary

WPM with 4.0 mg/L BA gave maximum regeneration frequency and shoots per explant.

A claim from Micropropagation and prevention of hyperhydricity in olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivar ‘Gemlik’ · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WPM with 4.0 mg/L BA gave maximum regeneration frequency and shoots per explant.

Taxon
olive (Olea europaea L.)Olea europaeat0
Material
Gemlikt0
Organ / stage
nodal explantse0
Treatment
WPM supplemented with 4.0 mg/L 6-benzyladenine (BA)e0
Outcome
regeneration frequency and number of shoots per explante0
Direction
Maximume0

Not reportedGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum regeneration frequency and number of shoots per explant were achieved from nodal explants cultured on WPM supplemented with 4.0 mg/L 6-benzyladenine (BA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–963
t0

“olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivar ‘Gemlik’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–95

Title

Micropropagation and prevention of hyperhydricity in olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivar ‘Gemlik’

Meltem Bayraktar; Sadiye Hayta-Smedley; Sundus Unal; et al. South African Journal of Botany 2019. doi:10.1016/j.sajb.2019.11.022

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-dac1dc7ef9ca559027a933e00c151bc684cff7c6fdb0c4ecd0be061516c25e81 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

N-benzyladenine · growth · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

in vitro · growth · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 17 positive, 2 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.