Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The 'Mavi' variety gave the highest rooting rate (74.33%) with 2 mg IBA on ½ OM medium.

A claim from Micropropagation of autochthonous olive varieties from Türkiye · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 'Mavi' variety gave the highest rooting rate (74.33%) with 2 mg IBA on ½ OM medium.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Material
‘Mavi’e3
Treatment
2 mg IBA (Indole Butyric Acid) treatment on ½ OM mediume3
Outcome
rooting ratee3
Direction
higheste3
Value
74.33%e3

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Olive (Olea europaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–24
e3

“‘Mavi’ variety formed more roots compared to ‘Guleki’ (3.33 vs. 2.75 per shoots), and gave the highest rooting rate of 74.33% with 2 mg IBA (Indole Butyric Acid) treatment on ½ OM medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1709

Title

Micropropagation of autochthonous olive varieties from Türkiye

Zeliha CIFTCI; Ebru SAKAR; Sezai ERCISLI; et al. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 2023. doi:10.15835/nbha51313267

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-347884dd0965e0efcc5f19a09723c9b2b707a38819849731fa9f508af39fadeb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

indole-3-butyric acid · growth · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 28 positive, 1 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

in vitro · growth · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 17 positive, 2 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.