Paper · 2023 · Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca

Micropropagation of autochthonous olive varieties from Türkiye

Zeliha CIFTCI; Ebru SAKAR; Sezai ERCISLI; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Olive (Olea europaea L.) is one of the oldest cultivated fruit species in the world. Fruits and oils of autocthonous olive varieties (native Turkish olive varieties) with unique sensory properties (taste, smell and aroma) gain importance recently. Particularly olive oil companies looking for varieties that have distinct taste, smell and aroma in their oil. Propagation of olive varieties by cuttings and grafting is very difficult and expensive, therefore it is important to find solution for easy and mass propagation. Micropropagation is particularly beneficial to propagate plants that are difficult to reproduce conventionally or to ensure virus-free plants or plants with particular qualities. In this study, in vitro micropropagation success of two autocthonous olive varieties (‘Mavi’ and ‘Guleki’) grown in the origin center of olive, Southeast Anatolia, Türkiye was investigated. Both varieties, have distinct smell, taste and aroma and are difficult to root by cuttings. The effects of three different medium OM (Olive Medium), WPM (Woody Plant Medium) and DKW (Driver-Kuniyuki Walnut Medium) and two different growth regulators BAP (6-Benzylaminopurine) and Zeatin on shoot induction (proliferation) in the in vitro micropropagation of the olive varieties were examined. Obtained shoots were later subjected to in vitro rooting and acclimatization. The highest proliferation efficiency and shoot length for both varieties were obtained with the use of 1 mg Zeatin+0.1 mg GAɜ hormone combinations on OM medium. ‘Mavi’ variety formed more roots compared to ‘Guleki’ (3.33 vs. 2.75 per shoots), and gave the highest rooting rate of 74.33% with 2 mg IBA (Indole Butyric Acid) treatment on ½ OM medium. In terms of rooting rate, Guleki gave the highest rooting (100%) on medium containing ½ OM, 0.2 mg GA3 and 4 mg IBA. 60% and 75% of the micropropagated plants of ‘Mavi’ and ‘Guleki’ varieties adapted well to the external conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zeatin and GA3 combinations on OM medium gave the highest proliferation efficiency and shoot length for both olive varieties.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Treatment
1 mg Zeatin+0.1 mg GAɜ hormone combinationse1
Outcome
proliferation efficiency and shoot lengthe1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Olive (Olea europaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest proliferation efficiency and shoot length for both varieties were obtained with the use of 1 mg Zeatin+0.1 mg GAɜ hormone combinations on OM medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1521 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 'Mavi' variety formed more roots per shoot than 'Guleki' (3.33 vs. 2.75).

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Material
‘Mavi’e3
Outcome
rootse3
Direction
moree3
Value
3.33 vs. 2.75 per shootse3
Comparator
‘Guleki’e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Olive (Olea europaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
e3

“‘Mavi’ variety formed more roots compared to ‘Guleki’ (3.33 vs. 2.75 per shoots), and gave the highest rooting rate of 74.33% with 2 mg IBA (Indole Butyric Acid) treatment on ½ OM medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1709 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 'Mavi' variety gave the highest rooting rate (74.33%) with 2 mg IBA on ½ OM medium.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Material
‘Mavi’e3
Treatment
2 mg IBA (Indole Butyric Acid) treatment on ½ OM mediume3
Outcome
rooting ratee3
Direction
higheste3
Value
74.33%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Olive (Olea europaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
e3

“‘Mavi’ variety formed more roots compared to ‘Guleki’ (3.33 vs. 2.75 per shoots), and gave the highest rooting rate of 74.33% with 2 mg IBA (Indole Butyric Acid) treatment on ½ OM medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1709 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 'Guleki' variety gave the highest rooting rate (100%) on medium with ½ OM, 0.2 mg GA3 and 4 mg IBA.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Material
Gulekie4
Treatment
medium containing ½ OM, 0.2 mg GA3 and 4 mg IBAe4
Outcome
rooting ratee4
Direction
higheste4
Value
100%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Olive (Olea europaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
e4

“In terms of rooting rate, Guleki gave the highest rooting (100%) on medium containing ½ OM, 0.2 mg GA3 and 4 mg IBA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1711–1826 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

60% and 75% of the micropropagated 'Mavi' and 'Guleki' plants adapted well to external conditions.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Material
‘Mavi’ and ‘Guleki’e5
Outcome
adapted well to the external conditionse5
Value
60% and 75%e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Olive (Olea europaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
e5

“60% and 75% of the micropropagated plants of ‘Mavi’ and ‘Guleki’ varieties adapted well to the external conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1828–1942 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · growth · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

indole-3-butyric acid · growth · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 28 positive, 1 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

in vitro · growth · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 17 positive, 2 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

class · growth · Olea europaea (common olive)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.