in vitro · Growth · Olea europaea (common olive)
23 claims from these papers; 2 citations between them.
Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.
How these papers cite each other
2 citations between these papers: 2 on the same side, 0 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 17
7143 歴史的都市における景観要素の変容に関する研究 : 山口県萩市を対象として(景観・歴史的街並み(2),都市計画) · 2005
- positive
GENETIC TRANSFORMATION OF OLIVE SOMATIC EMBRYOS THROUGH BIOLISTICS · 2007
- positive
- positive
Alternate Bearing in Olive (Olea europaea L.) · 2014
- positive
Applicability of the droplet vitrification method to olive somatic embryos · 2014
- positive
- no effect
- positive
- positive
Micropropagation and prevention of hyperhydricity in olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivar ‘Gemlik’ · 2019
- positive
- positive
- positive
Effect of Cryopreservation on Olive (Olea europaea L.) Plant Regeneration via Somatic Embryogenesis · 2020
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Micropropagation of autochthonous olive varieties from Türkiye · 2023
- positive
- positive
- positive
Efficient Shoot Induction from Apical Meristem Culture in Olive (Olea europaea L.) · 2025
- positive
Different Methods of Olive Micropropagation · 2025
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 2
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.