Claim · model-written summary
Cryopreservation did not significantly affect regeneration potential.
- Taxon
- olive
Olea europaeat0 - Treatment
- cryopreservatione0
- Outcome
- regeneration potentiale0
- Direction
- not significantly affectede0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the regeneration potential was not significantly affected by cryopreservation”
t0“olive”
Title
Applicability of the droplet vitrification method to olive somatic embryos
Fatiha Bradaï; Carolina Sánchez‐Romero Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (University of Málaga) 2014
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Association Genotype determined maintenance, maturation and regeneration potential of olive embryogenic lines.
- Intervention effect Cryopreservation affected proliferation capacity, germination of new embryos and shoot length.
- Association Genotype and cryopreservation interacted significantly for proliferation parameters.
- Association Cryopreservation effects on maturation culture morphology and embryo germination depended on genotype.
- Intervention effect Plantlet quality was similar in cryopreserved and control cultures.
- Intervention effect Shoots from cryopreserved olive explants were slightly longer.
- Method / resource Recovery after cryopreservation varied significantly by genotype, from 0 to 60%.
- Intervention effect Cultures from frozen embryos looked similar to their controls.
- Method / resource Droplet-vitrification was judged reliable for preserving olive embryo viability, embryogenic competence and regeneration capacity.
- Recommendation Additional optimization is recommended to improve recovery for some genotypes.