Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Cryopreservation raised fresh weight gain during proliferation in line T1.

A claim from Effect of Cryopreservation on Olive (Olea europaea L.) Plant Regeneration via Somatic Embryogenesis · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cryopreservation raised fresh weight gain during proliferation in line T1.

Taxon
OliveOlea europaeat0
Material
line T1e0
Treatment
cryopreservatione0
Outcome
fresh weight increasese0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only the line T1 was affected by cryopreservation, with higher fresh weight increases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–790
t0

“Olive (Olea europaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–54

Title

Effect of Cryopreservation on Olive (Olea europaea L.) Plant Regeneration via Somatic Embryogenesis

Fatiha Bradaï; Carolina Sánchez-Romero Plants 2020. doi:10.3390/plants10010034

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-9ee5813bb2747f45c0a9e6a0f600cf18d7361fb9ea3df4bcfc550a28a6a448b5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

in vitro · growth · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 17 positive, 2 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.