Paper · 2025 · Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca

Diversity and effectiveness of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi species in alleviating drought stress in tomato

Alaa F. SAID; Khairiah M. ALWUTAYD; Nehal KAMAL; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Water scarcity poses significant challenges to sustainable agriculture, and the anticipated increase in the frequency and severity of droughts due to climate change intensifies these constraints. Therefore, there is an urgent need to identify eco-friendly approaches to enhance drought tolerance, especially in arid regions, to ensure global food security, considering the growing world population. This study investigated the morphological diversity of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) species associated with the rhizosphere of cultivated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plants across diverse agroecosystems in twenty locations in Egypt. The results reveal the presence of five AMF species from the genus Glomus: G. invarmaium, G. xanthium, G. intraradices, G. mosseae, and G. macrocarpum. The study further explored the impact of mixed inoculation with the identified G. species on the physiological and morphological performance of tomato plants exposed to drought stress. The results showed that AMF inoculation significantly improved root colonization under drought stress. Inoculated plants showed significantly higher shoot and root fresh and dry weights than non-inoculated controls. AMF-inoculated plants also exhibited higher leaf chlorophyll concentrations and increased accumulation of stress-related metabolites such as proline, total soluble sugars, and glycine betaine compared to non-inoculated plants under drought stress. Leaf phosphorus concentration was enhanced in inoculated plants, whereas lipid peroxidation, indicated by malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, was reduced. Thermal imaging revealed that AMF inoculation led to lower canopy temperatures, indicating better stress tolerance. Therefore, AMF inoculation, particularly Glomus species, mitigated the adverse effects of drought stress on tomato plants, which indicates its potential for improving crop performance under water-limited conditions. These findings documented the importance of AMF in enhancing drought tolerance in tomato plants, suggesting that their application could be a viable strategy for sustainable agricultural practices in arid regions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five Glomus AMF species were found in the tomato rhizosphere.

Interactor
GlomusGlomuse0symbiont
Outcome
five AMF speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Glomus
Glomus · InteractorJerry Cooper · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results reveal the presence of five AMF species from the genus Glomus: G. invarmaium, G. xanthium, G. intraradices, G. mosseae, and G. macrocarpum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–794 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation significantly improved root colonization under drought stress.

Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
root colonizatione0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
under drought stresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that AMF inoculation significantly improved root colonization under drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1082 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated tomato plants had higher shoot and root fresh and dry weights than controls.

Treatment
Inoculatede0
Outcome
shoot and root fresh and dry weightse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
non-inoculated controlse0

Not reportedInteractorInteractor role

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculated plants showed significantly higher shoot and root fresh and dry weights than non-inoculated controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1195 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF-inoculated plants had higher leaf chlorophyll concentrations under drought stress.

Treatment
AMF-inoculatede0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
leaf chlorophyll concentrationse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
under drought stresse0
Comparator
non-inoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF-inoculated plants also exhibited higher leaf chlorophyll concentrations and increased accumulation of stress-related metabolites such as proline, total soluble sugars, and glycine betaine compared to non-inoculated plants under drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1443 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF-inoculated plants accumulated more proline, total soluble sugars, and glycine betaine under drought stress.

Treatment
AMF-inoculatede0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
proline, total soluble sugars, and glycine betainee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
under drought stresse0
Comparator
non-inoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF-inoculated plants also exhibited higher leaf chlorophyll concentrations and increased accumulation of stress-related metabolites such as proline, total soluble sugars, and glycine betaine compared to non-inoculated plants under drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1443 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf phosphorus concentration was enhanced in inoculated plants.

Treatment
inoculated plantse0
Outcome
Leaf phosphorus concentratione0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf phosphorus concentration was enhanced in inoculated plants, whereas lipid peroxidation, indicated by malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, was reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1592 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lipid peroxidation as indicated by MDA levels was reduced in inoculated plants.

Treatment
inoculated plantse0
Outcome
lipid peroxidatione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf phosphorus concentration was enhanced in inoculated plants, whereas lipid peroxidation, indicated by malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, was reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1592 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation lowered canopy temperatures.

Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
canopy temperaturese0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thermal imaging revealed that AMF inoculation led to lower canopy temperatures, indicating better stress tolerance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1593–1708 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–107 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · physiology: osmolytes · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

mycorrhiza · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 21 positive, 1 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

inoculation · physiology: oxidative · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 27 positive, 5 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

mycorrhiza · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 31 positive, 6 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

87 papers: 85 positive, 2 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

83 papers more in this group

See all 87 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 127 positive, 17 negative or no effect

126 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

140 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

inoculation · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

266 papers: 136 positive, 130 negative or no effect

135 papers in the same direction as this paper · 128 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

262 papers more in this group

See all 266 papers →

inoculation · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

441 papers: 387 positive, 54 negative or no effect

386 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

437 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.