Abstract
An experiment was conducted during Rabi season of 2004-05 involving three levels of nitrogen (0, 100 and 75% nitrogen) with four levels of biofertilizers (no inoculation, Azospirillum, Azotobacter and Azotobacter + Azospirillum). Out of the twelve treatment combinations the best treatment was 75 per cent nitrogen (120 kg ha-1) + Azotobacter + Azospirillum which showed significant increase in ascorbic acid content in curd (87.00 mg/100g), total nitrogen content in plant (2.98%), protein content in curds (18.62%) and compactness of curd (97.39%).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment increased curd ascorbic acid to 87.00 mg/100g.
- Taxon
- cauliflower Cv. Snowball-16
Brassica oleracea var. botrytist0 - Treatment
- 75 per cent nitrogen (120 kg ha-1) + Azotobacter + Azospirillume0
- Interactor
- Azotobacter
Azotobactere0symbiont - Second interactor
- Azospirillum
Azospirillume0symbiont - Outcome
- ascorbic acid content in curde0
- Direction
- significant increasee0
- Value
- 87.00 mg/100ge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the best treatment was 75 per cent nitrogen (120 kg ha-1) + Azotobacter + Azospirillum which showed significant increase in ascorbic acid content in curd (87.00 mg/100g), total nitrogen content in plant (2.98%), protein content in curds (18.62%) and compactness of curd (97.39%)”
t0“cauliflower Cv. Snowball-16”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment increased plant nitrogen content to 2.98%.
- Taxon
- cauliflower Cv. Snowball-16Brassica oleracea var. botrytist0
- Treatment
- 75 per cent nitrogen (120 kg ha-1) + Azotobacter + Azospirillume0
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
- Second interactor
- AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
- Outcome
- total nitrogen content in plante0
- Direction
- significant increasee0
- Value
- 2.98%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the best treatment was 75 per cent nitrogen (120 kg ha-1) + Azotobacter + Azospirillum which showed significant increase in ascorbic acid content in curd (87.00 mg/100g), total nitrogen content in plant (2.98%), protein content in curds (18.62%) and compactness of curd (97.39%)”
t0“cauliflower Cv. Snowball-16”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment increased curd protein content to 18.62%.
- Taxon
- cauliflower Cv. Snowball-16Brassica oleracea var. botrytist0
- Treatment
- 75 per cent nitrogen (120 kg ha-1) + Azotobacter + Azospirillume0
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
- Second interactor
- AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
- Outcome
- protein content in curdse0
- Direction
- significant increasee0
- Value
- 18.62%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the best treatment was 75 per cent nitrogen (120 kg ha-1) + Azotobacter + Azospirillum which showed significant increase in ascorbic acid content in curd (87.00 mg/100g), total nitrogen content in plant (2.98%), protein content in curds (18.62%) and compactness of curd (97.39%)”
t0“cauliflower Cv. Snowball-16”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment increased curd compactness to 97.39%.
- Taxon
- cauliflower Cv. Snowball-16Brassica oleracea var. botrytist0
- Treatment
- 75 per cent nitrogen (120 kg ha-1) + Azotobacter + Azospirillume0
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
- Second interactor
- AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
- Outcome
- compactness of curde0
- Direction
- significant increasee0
- Value
- 97.39%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the best treatment was 75 per cent nitrogen (120 kg ha-1) + Azotobacter + Azospirillum which showed significant increase in ascorbic acid content in curd (87.00 mg/100g), total nitrogen content in plant (2.98%), protein content in curds (18.62%) and compactness of curd (97.39%)”
t0“cauliflower Cv. Snowball-16”
The same questions in other papers
Azospirillum · nutrient: content · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Azospirillum · quality: protein · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Azospirillum · quality: phytochemicals · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Azotobacter · quality: phytochemicals · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Azotobacter · quality: protein · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Azotobacter · nutrient: content · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →nitrogen · quality: protein · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results differ
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →nitrogen · quality: phytochemicals · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.