Paper · 2025 · Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy

Optimizing methane emissions: Coordinated manure and irrigation practices and their effects on soil carbon dynamics and methanotroph activity

Farzad Rassaei

8
claims
24
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Continuous flooding irrigation (CFI) is the conventional practice in rice cultivation but contributes significantly to methane (CH 4 ) emissions. Alternative wetting and drying irrigation (AWDI) offers improved water efficiency and reduced greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Livestock manures like cow manure (CM) are widely used to replenish soil nutrients, yet limited research explores how CM and irrigation practices interact to influence these factors. A greenhouse experiment tested CM at 15 and 30 ton ha −1 under CFI and AWDI. CM application increased CH 4 emissions by up to 62% at higher rates. However, AWDI reduced CH 4 emissions by 32% compared to CFI, with a further 25%–26% reduction when combined with CM. AWDI lowered water usage by 18% without affecting grain yield or biomass, both of which improved under CM. CH 4 emissions under AWDI showed a strong inverse correlation with days after planting, highlighting the role of substrate availability during key growth stages. Extended CM composting further amplified emissions by creating bioavailable compounds favoring methanogens. CFI intensifies CH 4 emissions through sustained anaerobic conditions, while AWDI interrupts methanogenesis via periodic soil aeration. This study underscores the complex interplay between CM, irrigation, and CH 4 emissions, positioning AWDI as a sustainable strategy to reduce GHGs without compromising productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher cow manure rates increased methane emissions by up to 62%.

Treatment
CM applicatione0
Outcome
CH 4 emissionse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
62%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CM application increased CH 4 emissions by up to 62% at higher rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–609 · show in text ↑
t0

“methane emissions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 78–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternative wetting and drying irrigation reduced methane emissions 32% versus continuous flooding.

Treatment
AWDIe0
Outcome
CH 4 emissionse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
32%e0
Comparator
CFIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AWDI reduced CH 4 emissions by 32% compared to CFI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–670 · show in text ↑
t0

“methane emissions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 78–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternative wetting and drying with cow manure further reduced methane emissions by 25%–26%.

Treatment
combined with CMe0
Outcome
reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
25%–26%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with a further 25%–26% reduction when combined with CM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–726 · show in text ↑
t0

“methane emissions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 78–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternative wetting and drying lowered water use 18%.

Treatment
AWDIe0
Outcome
water usagee0
Direction
lowerede0
Value
18%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AWDI lowered water usage by 18%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–759 · show in text ↑
t0

“methane emissions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 78–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternative wetting and drying did not affect grain yield or biomass.

Treatment
AWDIe0
Outcome
grain yield or biomasse0
Direction
without affectinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AWDI lowered water usage by 18% without affecting grain yield or biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“methane emissions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 78–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cow manure improved grain yield and biomass.

Treatment
CMe0
Outcome
grain yield or biomasse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield or biomass, both of which improved under CM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–833 · show in text ↑
t0

“methane emissions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 78–94 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methane emissions under alternative wetting and drying were inversely correlated with days after planting.

Organ / stage
days after plantinge0
Treatment
AWDIe0
Outcome
CH 4 emissionse0
Direction
inverse correlatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CH 4 emissions under AWDI showed a strong inverse correlation with days after planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–921 · show in text ↑
t0

“methane emissions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 78–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extended cow manure composting amplified methane emissions.

Treatment
Extended CM compostinge0
Outcome
emissionse0
Direction
amplifiede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Extended CM composting further amplified emissions by creating bioavailable compounds favoring methanogens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1103 · show in text ↑
t0

“methane emissions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 78–94 · show in text ↑

fertilization · environment: emissions · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

108 papers: 73 positive, 35 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 73 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

104 papers more in this group

See all 108 papers →

processing · environment: emissions · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

processing · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

114 papers: 88 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 88 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

110 papers more in this group

See all 114 papers →

irrigation · environment: emissions · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

127 papers: 109 positive, 18 negative or no effect

108 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

123 papers more in this group

See all 127 papers →

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

264 papers in the same direction as this paper · 906 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,167 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.