Paper · 2025

Effect of Nano Potassium and Nano Zinc on Growth and Yield Enhancement in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Management Review

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The field experiment was conducted during Rabi season 2022 at experimental field of Crop Research Farm, Department of Agronomy, Naini Agricultural Institute, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology And Sciences, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India. The soil of experimental plot was sandy loam in texture, nearly neutral in soil reaction (pH 7.3), low in organic carbon (0.48%), available nitrogen (230 kg/ha), available phosphorus (13.60 kg/ha) and available potassium (215.4 kg/ha). The treatment consists of 3 levels of Nano potassium 25, 40, 55 ppm and Nano zinc 60, 80, 120 ppm along with control. The experiment was layout in Randomized Block Design with ten treatments each replicated thrice. Higher plant height (93.43 cm), plant dry weight (26.99 g), tillers/running row meter (73.57) and the yield attributes namely spike length (11.93 cm), grains/spike (51.67), spikes/running row meter (62.90), effective tillers/running row meter (60.10), grain yield (6.61 t/ha) and straw yield (8.90 t/ha were obtained highest in the treatment 9 [Nano potassium 55ppm + Nano zinc 120ppm].

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of nano potassium 55ppm and nano zinc 120ppm had the highest plant height of 93.43 cm.

Treatment
Nano potassium 55ppm + Nano zinc 120ppme0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
Highere0
Value
93.43 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher plant height (93.43 cm), plant dry weight (26.99 g), tillers/running row meter (73.57) and the yield attributes namely spike length (11.93 cm), grains/spike (51.67), spikes/running row meter (62.90), effective tillers/running row meter (60.10), grain yield (6.61 t/ha) and straw yield (8.90 t/ha were obtained highest in the treatment 9 [Nano potassium 55ppm + Nano zinc 120ppm]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–1096 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination produced highest plant dry weight of 26.99 g.

Treatment
Nano potassium 55ppm + Nano zinc 120ppme0
Outcome
plant dry weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
26.99 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant dry weight (26.99 g), tillers/running row meter (73.57) and the yield attributes namely spike length (11.93 cm), grains/spike (51.67), spikes/running row meter (62.90), effective tillers/running row meter (60.10), grain yield (6.61 t/ha) and straw yield (8.90 t/ha were obtained highest in the treatment 9 [Nano potassium 55ppm + Nano zinc 120ppm]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–1096 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination produced highest tillers per running row meter of 73.57.

Treatment
Nano potassium 55ppm + Nano zinc 120ppme0
Outcome
tillers/running row metere0
Direction
higheste0
Value
73.57e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tillers/running row meter (73.57) and the yield attributes namely spike length (11.93 cm), grains/spike (51.67), spikes/running row meter (62.90), effective tillers/running row meter (60.10), grain yield (6.61 t/ha) and straw yield (8.90 t/ha were obtained highest in the treatment 9 [Nano potassium 55ppm + Nano zinc 120ppm]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–1096 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination produced highest spike length of 11.93 cm.

Treatment
Nano potassium 55ppm + Nano zinc 120ppme0
Outcome
spike lengthe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
11.93 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spike length (11.93 cm), grains/spike (51.67), spikes/running row meter (62.90), effective tillers/running row meter (60.10), grain yield (6.61 t/ha) and straw yield (8.90 t/ha were obtained highest in the treatment 9 [Nano potassium 55ppm + Nano zinc 120ppm]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–1096 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination produced highest grains per spike of 51.67.

Treatment
Nano potassium 55ppm + Nano zinc 120ppme0
Outcome
grains/spikee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
51.67e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grains/spike (51.67), spikes/running row meter (62.90), effective tillers/running row meter (60.10), grain yield (6.61 t/ha) and straw yield (8.90 t/ha were obtained highest in the treatment 9 [Nano potassium 55ppm + Nano zinc 120ppm]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–1096 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination produced highest spikes per running row meter of 62.90.

Treatment
Nano potassium 55ppm + Nano zinc 120ppme0
Outcome
spikes/running row metere0
Direction
higheste0
Value
62.90e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spikes/running row meter (62.90), effective tillers/running row meter (60.10), grain yield (6.61 t/ha) and straw yield (8.90 t/ha were obtained highest in the treatment 9 [Nano potassium 55ppm + Nano zinc 120ppm]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1096 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination produced highest effective tillers per running row meter of 60.10.

Treatment
Nano potassium 55ppm + Nano zinc 120ppme0
Outcome
effective tillers/running row metere0
Direction
higheste0
Value
60.10e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effective tillers/running row meter (60.10), grain yield (6.61 t/ha) and straw yield (8.90 t/ha were obtained highest in the treatment 9 [Nano potassium 55ppm + Nano zinc 120ppm]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1096 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination produced highest grain yield of 6.61 t/ha.

Treatment
Nano potassium 55ppm + Nano zinc 120ppme0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
6.61 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield (6.61 t/ha) and straw yield (8.90 t/ha were obtained highest in the treatment 9 [Nano potassium 55ppm + Nano zinc 120ppm]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1096 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination produced highest straw yield of 8.90 t/ha.

Treatment
Nano potassium 55ppm + Nano zinc 120ppme0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
8.90 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“straw yield (8.90 t/ha were obtained highest in the treatment 9 [Nano potassium 55ppm + Nano zinc 120ppm]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1096 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–79 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

200 papers: 155 positive, 45 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
    Wheat plants with low Mn or low Zn supply showed no growth differences from controls at the three harvests.

    Distribution and remobilization of Zn and Mn during grain development in wheat · 1994 · compared with controls (sufficient Zn and Mn)

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  3. negative

196 papers more in this group

See all 200 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

potassium · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 66 positive, 13 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

168 papers: 146 positive, 22 negative or no effect

145 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

164 papers more in this group

See all 168 papers →

potassium · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

257 papers: 227 positive, 30 negative or no effect

226 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

253 papers more in this group

See all 257 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

260 papers: 242 positive, 18 negative or no effect

241 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

256 papers more in this group

See all 260 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.