Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The combination produced highest straw yield of 8.90 t/ha.

A claim from Effect of Nano Potassium and Nano Zinc on Growth and Yield Enhancement in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination produced highest straw yield of 8.90 t/ha.

Treatment
Nano potassium 55ppm + Nano zinc 120ppme0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
8.90 t/hae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“straw yield (8.90 t/ha were obtained highest in the treatment 9 [Nano potassium 55ppm + Nano zinc 120ppm]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1096
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–79

Title

Effect of Nano Potassium and Nano Zinc on Growth and Yield Enhancement in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Management Review 2025. doi:10.31234/osf.io/ke9ud_v1

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-80f9f992b136b74aa4bd86148e75a6c473e1520dc646ce378fb42d876490d39a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this claim · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Zinc application yielded hardly any benefit.

    Landscape positions dictating crop fertilizer responses in wheat-based farming systems of East African Highlands · 2020

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Zinc inhibited non mycorrhizal wheat root dry yield.

    Arbuscular mycorrhizal strategy for zinc mycoremediation and diminished translocation to shoots and grains in wheat · 2017

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Foliar Zn had no significant effect on wheat grain yield.

    Foliar zinc fertilization improves the zinc nutritional value of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain · 2011

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Zinc supply had little effect on wheat biomass.

    Plant growth and cation composition of two cultivars of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) differing in P uptake efficiency · 2001

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Soil Zn fertilisers had no significant effect on grain Zn concentration or yield.

    Site-Specific Factors Influence the Field Performance of a Zn-Biofortified Wheat Variety · 2020

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Soil Zn application did not significantly affect wheat grain yield.

    Relevance for food sciences of quantitative spatially resolved element profile investigations in wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) grain · 2013

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Zn-EDTA gave the opposite grain yield result to ZnSO4.

    Zinc Enrichment in Two Contrasting Genotypes of Triticum aestivum L. Grains: Interactions between Edaphic Conditions and Foliar Fertilizers · 2021 · compared with ZnSO4

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Combined foliar zinc and pesticides had no adverse effect on grain yield or other nutrients.

    Improving Zinc Concentration and Bioavailability of Wheat Grain through Combined Foliar Applications of Zinc and Pesticides · 2019

    Opposite direction

502 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

potassium · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

257 papers: 227 positive, 30 negative or no effect

226 papers in the same direction as this claim · 29 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    NK reduced yield to near the unfertilized control level.

    Effects of Long-Term Fertilization on Leaf Photosynthetic Characteristics and Grain Yield in Winter Wheat · 2004 · compared with no fertilizer

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Nano-N with 75% conventional N gave wheat and maize grain yield at par with full conventional fertilizer.

    Changes in microbial community structure and yield responses with the use of nano-fertilizers of nitrogen and zinc in wheat–maize system · 2024 · compared with N 100 PK

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Incorporating P and K into the subsoil did not further change wheat yield.

    The effects of subsoiling and deep incorporation of P and K fertilizers on the yield and nutrient uptake of barley, potatoes, wheat and sugar beet grown in rotation · 1979

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Applications of multiple nutrients did not significantly increase wheat yield.

    Evidence for the involvement of the root lesion nematode Pratylenchus thornei in wheat yield decline in northern New South Wales · 1987

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Enterobacter cloacae Rhizo_33 without potassium increased grain yield by 19·16%.

    Impact of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on different forms of soil potassium under wheat cultivation · 2019

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  6. no effect
    Wheat biomass did not increase with potassium addition.

    Differential response of weed and crop species to potassium and sulphur fertilizers · 2007

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Potassium rates did not significantly affect harvest index.

    Potassium Fertilization and its Level on Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Yield in Shallow Depth Soils of Northern Ethiopia · 2017

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    K had no significant effect on grain yield or total dry matter.

    Effect of Potassium and Nitrogen Fertilization on Lysine, Methionine, and Total Protein Contents of Wheat Grain, Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell.1 · 1972

    Opposite direction

248 papers more in this group

See all 257 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

260 papers: 242 positive, 18 negative or no effect

241 papers in the same direction as this claim · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    The higher nano iron oxide rate decreased those three traits.

    Effect of foliar application of nano-iron oxidase, iron chelate and iron sulphate rates on yield and quality of wheat. · 2013

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Nitrogen fertilizer treatments showed significant annual wheat yield declines of 76 to 114 kg ha−1 yr−1.

    Effects of Inorganic Fertilizer Inputs on Grain Yields and Soil Properties in a Long‐Term Wheat–Corn Cropping System in South China · 2008

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Wheat yield declined by 84.7 kg/ha/yr under NP fertilization

    Trends in grain yields and soil organic C in a long‐term fertilization experiment in the China Loess Plateau · 2008

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Under 100% NP, wheat grain yield fell 19% in 1994 to 1998 relative to 1973 to 1977.

    EFFECTS OF TWENTY-FIVE YEARS OF FERTILIZER USE ON MAIZE AND WHEAT YIELDS AND QUALITY OF AN ACIDIC SOIL IN THE WESTERN HIMALAYAS · 2003 · compared with 1973 to 1977

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Nano-N with 75% conventional N gave wheat and maize grain yield at par with full conventional fertilizer.

    Changes in microbial community structure and yield responses with the use of nano-fertilizers of nitrogen and zinc in wheat–maize system · 2024 · compared with N 100 PK

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    65 kg ha –1 plus nano urea foliar sprays reduced wheat grain yield by 10.7 %.

    Relative performance of granulated and nano urea on productivity and nitrogen use efficiency of wheat–rice sequence · 2024

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Nanoselenium and sodium selenite also had no significant effect on wheat yield.

    Humic acid chelated selenium is suitable for wheat biofortification · 2023

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Combined NPK and NANO-GRO did not affect grain yield or its components in common wheat or spelt.

    Nutritional and technological characteristics of common and spelt wheats are affected by mineral fertilizer and organic stimulator NANO-GRO · 2016

    Opposite direction

251 papers more in this group

See all 260 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.