Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research

Mulberry leaf quality influenced by surface, subsurface manuring and fertilizer application in irrigated conditions of Karnataka

Chuncha Laxmi Prasanna; DV Naveen; P Veeranagappa; et al.

5
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted for three crop cuttings of mulberry (2023-2024) in Kurburu village of Chinthamani taluk to test the effect of surface, subsurface manuring and fertilizer application on leaf quality of mulberry crop in irrigated condition. The experiment was laid out in split plot design with fourteen treatment combinations and three replications. Main plots include two different types of manuring viz., Surface manuring M1 and Subsurface manuring-M2 at 60-75 cm depth with FYM (Farm yard manure) and enriched manure. Subplots include R1-Absolute control, R2-50% RDF + FYM, R3-75% RDF + FYM, R4-100% RDF + FYM, R5-50% RDF + enriched compost, R6-75% RDF + enriched compost, R7-100% RDF + enriched compost, quality parameters leaf area, leaf area index and chlorophyll content were recorded at 30, 45 and 60 Days after pruning (DAP) for three crops. The protein content was recorded at harvest of mulberry. The results of the experiment revealed that the subsurface manuring with enriched manure recorded highest single leaf area (110.19, 156.73 and 235.90 cm2), LAI (4.53, 6.44 and 9.69), chlorophyll SPAD reading (54.53, 54.99 and 54.90), protein content (29.38, 29.64 and 31.06%) for first, second and third crops. Effect of subsurface manuring is differed from surface manuring due to direct availability of nutrients at rhizosphere zone enhance uptake of nutrients like nitrogen helps to increase leaf area, LAI, chlorophyll SPAD reading and protein content.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsurface manuring with enriched manure gave the highest single leaf area in mulberry in the first, second and third crops.

Taxon
Mulberryt0
Treatment
subsurface manuring with enriched manuree0
Outcome
single leaf areae1
Direction
higheste0
Value
110.19, 156.73 and 235.90 cm2e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Mulberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–8 · show in text ↑
e0

“subsurface manuring with enriched manure recorded highest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1029 · show in text ↑
e1

“highest single leaf area (110.19, 156.73 and 235.90 cm2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1078 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsurface manuring with enriched manure gave the highest leaf area index in mulberry in the three crops.

Taxon
Mulberryt0
Treatment
subsurface manuring with enriched manuree0
Outcome
LAIe1
Direction
higheste0
Value
4.53, 6.44 and 9.69e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Mulberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–8 · show in text ↑
e0

“subsurface manuring with enriched manure recorded highest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1029 · show in text ↑
e1

“LAI (4.53, 6.44 and 9.69)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsurface manuring with enriched manure gave the highest chlorophyll SPAD reading in mulberry in the three crops.

Taxon
Mulberryt0
Treatment
subsurface manuring with enriched manuree0
Outcome
chlorophyll SPAD readinge1
Direction
higheste0
Value
54.53, 54.99 and 54.90e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Mulberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–8 · show in text ↑
e0

“subsurface manuring with enriched manure recorded highest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1029 · show in text ↑
e1

“chlorophyll SPAD reading (54.53, 54.99 and 54.90)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1156 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsurface manuring with enriched manure gave the highest leaf protein content in mulberry in the three crops.

Taxon
Mulberryt0
Treatment
subsurface manuring with enriched manuree0
Outcome
protein contente1
Direction
higheste0
Value
29.38, 29.64 and 31.06%e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Mulberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–8 · show in text ↑
e0

“subsurface manuring with enriched manure recorded highest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1029 · show in text ↑
e1

“protein content (29.38, 29.64 and 31.06%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1199 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute the advantage of subsurface over surface manuring to direct nutrient availability at the rhizosphere, which enhances nutrient uptake such as nitrogen.

Taxon
Mulberryt0
Treatment
subsurface manuringe0
Outcome
uptake of nutrientse0
Comparator
surface manuringe0

Verbatim

t0

“Mulberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–8 · show in text ↑
e0

“Effect of subsurface manuring is differed from surface manuring due to direct availability of nutrients at rhizosphere zone enhance uptake of nutrients like nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1400 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: protein · Morus (mulberry trees)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

fertilization · growth · Morus (mulberry trees)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 19 positive, 3 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Morus (mulberry trees)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.