Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Growth and growth indices of rice (Oryza sativa L.) as influenced by different sources of nano urea and mulches

L Vinod; US Kudtarkar; TN Thorat; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Enhancing nutrient use efficiency and optimizing plant growth through nano-based inputs and eco-friendly mulching strategies is a promising approach for sustainable rice production. A field experiment was conducted during the kharif 2024 at the Instructional Farm, Department of Agronomy, DBSKKV, College of Agriculture, Dapoli to study the influence of different sources of nano urea and mulches on growth indices of kharif dibbled rice (Oryza sativa L.). The experiment was laid out in a split-plot design with three main plot treatments: Nano urea (market product) @ 40 ppm (N1), Nano urea synthesized @ 40 ppm (N2), and Nano urea conjugate @ 40 ppm (N3) and five subplot treatments: 100% wool mulch (M1), 100% wool mulch with micronutrients (M2), polythene mulch (silver-black, 30 microns) (M3), drip HDPE mulch (M4), and no mulch (control) (M5). The results indicated that, nano urea conjugate (N3) significantly improved plant height, dry matter accumulation and showed higher values for growth indices such as absolute growth rate (AGR) for plant height and dry matter accumulation and crop growth rate (CGR), similarly for treatment M2 (100% wool mulch with micronutrient, 200GSM) and treatment N1- nano urea (market product) @40ppm and M5 showed higher values for relative growth rate (RGR) and net assimilation ratio (NAR) across all growth stages.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In a field experiment, nano urea conjugate (N3) significantly improved rice plant height and dry matter accumulation.

Treatment
nano urea conjugate (N3)e0
Outcome
plant height, dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nano urea conjugate (N3) significantly improved plant height, dry matter accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–964 · show in text ↑
e1

“kharif dibbled rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–455 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano urea conjugate (N3) gave higher values of the growth indices absolute growth rate (for plant height and dry matter accumulation) and crop growth rate in rice.

Treatment
nano urea conjugate (N3)e0
Outcome
absolute growth rate (AGR) for plant height and dry matter accumulation and crop growth rate (CGR)e0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nano urea conjugate (N3) significantly improved plant height, dry matter accumulation and showed higher values for growth indices such as absolute growth rate (AGR) for plant height and dry matter accumulation and crop growth rate (CGR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1115 · show in text ↑
e1

“kharif dibbled rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–455 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment M2 (100% wool mulch with micronutrient, 200GSM) showed higher relative growth rate and net assimilation ratio across all growth stages in rice.

Treatment
M2 (100% wool mulch with micronutrient, 200GSM)e0
Outcome
relative growth rate (RGR) and net assimilation ratio (NAR)e0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment M2 (100% wool mulch with micronutrient, 200GSM) and treatment N1- nano urea (market product) @40ppm and M5 showed higher values for relative growth rate (RGR) and net assimilation ratio (NAR) across all growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1357 · show in text ↑
e1

“kharif dibbled rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–455 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment N1, market-product nano urea at 40 ppm, showed higher relative growth rate and net assimilation ratio across all growth stages in rice.

Treatment
N1- nano urea (market product) @40ppme0
Outcome
relative growth rate (RGR) and net assimilation ratio (NAR)e0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment M2 (100% wool mulch with micronutrient, 200GSM) and treatment N1- nano urea (market product) @40ppm and M5 showed higher values for relative growth rate (RGR) and net assimilation ratio (NAR) across all growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1357 · show in text ↑
e1

“kharif dibbled rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–455 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment M5 (no mulch control) showed higher relative growth rate and net assimilation ratio across all growth stages in rice.

Treatment
M5e0
Outcome
relative growth rate (RGR) and net assimilation ratio (NAR)e0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment M2 (100% wool mulch with micronutrient, 200GSM) and treatment N1- nano urea (market product) @40ppm and M5 showed higher values for relative growth rate (RGR) and net assimilation ratio (NAR) across all growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1357 · show in text ↑
e1

“kharif dibbled rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–455 · show in text ↑

mulching · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 34 positive, 12 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 132 positive, 12 negative or no effect

131 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

140 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

202 papers: 189 positive, 13 negative or no effect

188 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

198 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

511 papers: 402 positive, 109 negative or no effect

401 papers in the same direction as this paper · 101 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

micronutrient · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.