Abstract
This study examined to evaluate the nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) of neem-coated urea (NCU), nano urea (NU) and productivity of two widely grown rice varieties, ASD16 and ADT46 around Tamirabarani River basin. Treatments included varying foliar dosages of NCU, NU, the recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) and control. Results showed RDF significantly outperformed all treatments in quantitative parameters (plant height, tiller density, grain yield, straw yield) and qualitative parameters (chlorophyll content, leaf area index), followed by NCU, NU and the control. The balanced nutrient profile of RDF and soil-based application maximized uptake and plant growth, unlike the nitrogen-limited and foliar-dependent NCU and NU. Notably, NCU’s higher nitrogen content (46 %) and slow-release properties via neem coating enhanced absorption compared to NU’s lower nitrogen (4 %) and reliance on foliar uptake, which likely faced inefficiencies due to leaf surface limitations and environmental factors like humidity. These findings position RDF as the most effective option for optimizing rice productivity in this region, highlighting the critical role of comprehensive nutrient delivery and efficient absorption mechanisms.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Recommended fertilizer significantly outperformed other treatments for plant height, tiller density and grain yield.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- RDFe0
- Outcome
- plant height, tiller density, grain yielde0
- Direction
- outperformede0
- Comparator
- all treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“RDF significantly outperformed all treatments in quantitative parameters (plant height, tiller density, grain yield, straw yield)”
t0“rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Recommended fertilizer significantly outperformed other treatments for straw yield.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- RDFe0
- Outcome
- straw yielde0
- Direction
- outperformede0
- Comparator
- all treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“RDF significantly outperformed all treatments in quantitative parameters (plant height, tiller density, grain yield, straw yield)”
t0“rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Recommended fertilizer significantly outperformed other treatments for chlorophyll content and leaf area index.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- RDFe0
- Outcome
- chlorophyll content, leaf area indexe0
- Direction
- outperformede0
- Comparator
- all treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“RDF significantly outperformed all treatments in quantitative parameters (plant height, tiller density, grain yield, straw yield) and qualitative parameters (chlorophyll content, leaf area index)”
t0“rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Neem-coated urea ranked below RDF but above nano urea and control.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- NCUe0
- Outcome
- followed by NCU, NU and the controle0
- Direction
- followede0
- Comparator
- NU and the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“followed by NCU, NU and the control”
t0“rice”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend RDF as the most effective option for rice productivity.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- RDFe0
- Outcome
- RDF as the most effective option for optimizing rice productivitye0
- Setting
- this regione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“These findings position RDF as the most effective option for optimizing rice productivity in this region”
t0“rice”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · control · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →botanical · control · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- positive
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →fertilization · physiology: pigments · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
120 papers more in this group
See all 124 papers →fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
3,451 papers more in this group
See all 3,455 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.