Paper · 2009 · Zhongguo nongye Kexue

Effects of Enhanced UV-B Irradiance and Drought Stress on the Growth, Production, and Biomass of Spring Wheat

Tianpeng Gao; Lizhe An; Huyuan Feng

16
claims
33
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

【Objective】 The effects of enhanced UV-B radiation and drought stress on growth, production, and biomass of three spring wheat varieties were studied to provide a basis for breeding spring wheat varieties of high yield and tolerance to drought and anti UV-B radiation. 【Method】 Drought, enhanced UV-B radiation, and interaction between drought and enhanced UV-B radiation were set to analyze the morphologic index such as flag leaf area, leaf thickness, leaf area index, biomass, root to shoot ratio, and production harvest index, and other biological indicators of three spring wheat cultivars in northwestern China as well. 【Result】 The results showed that enhanced UV-B radiation restrained the node-tillering, resulting in decreased number of tillering nodes, and that moderate drought increased the number of tillering nodes. Under the enhanced UV-B radiation and drought, the biomass of Dingxi-24, Longchun-8139 and Heshangtou reduced by 22%, 21% and 15%, respectively, the average reduction of biomass was 20%. Drought had a less adverse effect on harvest index and yield than enhanced Ultraviolet-B radiation and the interaction between them did. Drought stress increased the harvest index of Heshangtou and Dingxi-24 by 10%, Longchun-8139 by 23%. In contrast, enhanced ultraviolet radiation-B decreased the harvest index of Heshangtou by 10%, and it increased the harvest index of Dingxi-24 and Longchun-8139 by 10%. This indicated that different species allocated inequable proportion of biomass to procreation growth under enhanced ultraviolet-B radiation, drought and the interaction between them. 【Conclusion】 There is a difference among varieties of spring wheat under enhanced ultraviolet-B radiation and drought. Response trend of the three species to enhanced ultraviolet-B radiation and drought is by and large accordant. Drought and enhanced ultraviolet-B radiation had a restraining effect on the three species, but sensible difference amongst species. Longchun-8139 showed a lower number of tillering nodes, highest harvest index and yield in contrast to Heshangtou and Dingxi-24 under enhanced ultraviolet-B radiation and drought. Therefore, Longchun-8139 had more advantages over Heshangtou and Dingxi-24 under enhanced ultraviolet-B radiation and drought.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enhanced UV-B reduced the number of tillering nodes.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
enhanced UV-B radiatione0
Outcome
number of tillering nodese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“enhanced UV-B radiation restrained the node-tillering, resulting in decreased number of tillering nodes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–762 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate drought increased tillering nodes.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
moderate droughte0
Outcome
number of tillering nodese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“moderate drought increased the number of tillering nodes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–830 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under combined UV-B and drought, Dingxi-24 biomass fell by 22%.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Dingxi-24e0
Treatment
enhanced UV-B radiation and droughte0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
22%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under the enhanced UV-B radiation and drought, the biomass of Dingxi-24, Longchun-8139 and Heshangtou reduced by 22%, 21% and 15%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–974 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under combined UV-B and drought, Longchun-8139 biomass fell by 21%.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Longchun-8139e0
Treatment
enhanced UV-B radiation and droughte0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
21%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under the enhanced UV-B radiation and drought, the biomass of Dingxi-24, Longchun-8139 and Heshangtou reduced by 22%, 21% and 15%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–974 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under combined UV-B and drought, Heshangtou biomass fell by 15%.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Heshangtoue0
Treatment
enhanced UV-B radiation and droughte0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
15%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under the enhanced UV-B radiation and drought, the biomass of Dingxi-24, Longchun-8139 and Heshangtou reduced by 22%, 21% and 15%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–974 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The average biomass reduction under combined stress was 20%.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Enhanced UV-B Irradiance and Drought Stresst0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
20%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the average reduction of biomass was 20%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1017 · show in text ↑
t0

“Enhanced UV-B Irradiance and Drought Stress on the Growth, Production, and Biomass of Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought had less adverse effect on harvest index and yield than UV-B or their interaction.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Droughte0
Outcome
harvest index and yielde0
Direction
less adversee0
Comparator
enhanced Ultraviolet-B radiation and the interaction between theme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought had a less adverse effect on harvest index and yield than enhanced Ultraviolet-B radiation and the interaction between them did.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1154 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought raised Heshangtou harvest index by 10%.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Heshangtoue0
Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress increased the harvest index of Heshangtou and Dingxi-24 by 10%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1232 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought raised Dingxi-24 harvest index by 10%.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Dingxi-24e0
Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress increased the harvest index of Heshangtou and Dingxi-24 by 10%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1232 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought raised Longchun-8139 harvest index by 23%.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Longchun-8139e0
Treatment
Drought Stresst0
Outcome
harvest indexe1
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
23%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Longchun-8139 by 23%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1255 · show in text ↑
t0

“Drought Stress on the Growth, Production, and Biomass of Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“Drought had a less adverse effect on harvest index and yield than enhanced Ultraviolet-B radiation and the interaction between them did.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enhanced UV-B lowered Heshangtou harvest index by 10%.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Heshangtoue0
Treatment
enhanced ultraviolet radiation-Be0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
10%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“enhanced ultraviolet radiation-B decreased the harvest index of Heshangtou by 10%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1350 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enhanced UV-B raised Dingxi-24 harvest index by 10%.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Dingxi-24e0
Treatment
Enhanced UV-B Irradiancet0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it increased the harvest index of Dingxi-24 and Longchun-8139 by 10%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1424 · show in text ↑
t0

“Enhanced UV-B Irradiance and Drought Stress on the Growth, Production, and Biomass of Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enhanced UV-B raised Longchun-8139 harvest index by 10%.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Longchun-8139e0
Treatment
Enhanced UV-B Irradiancet0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it increased the harvest index of Dingxi-24 and Longchun-8139 by 10%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1424 · show in text ↑
t0

“Enhanced UV-B Irradiance and Drought Stress on the Growth, Production, and Biomass of Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–109 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought and enhanced UV-B restrained all three wheat varieties, with different sensitivities.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Drought and enhanced ultraviolet-B radiatione0
Outcome
restraining effect on the three speciese0
Direction
restraininge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought and enhanced ultraviolet-B radiation had a restraining effect on the three species, but sensible difference amongst species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1840–1972 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longchun-8139 had fewer tillering nodes than Heshangtou and Dingxi-24 under combined stress.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Longchun-8139e0
Treatment
enhanced ultraviolet-B radiation and droughte0
Outcome
number of tillering nodese0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
Heshangtou and Dingxi-24e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Longchun-8139 showed a lower number of tillering nodes, highest harvest index and yield in contrast to Heshangtou and Dingxi-24 under enhanced ultraviolet-B radiation and drought.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1973–2152 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longchun-8139 had the highest harvest index and yield under combined stress.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Longchun-8139e0
Treatment
enhanced ultraviolet-B radiation and droughte0
Outcome
harvest index and yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
Heshangtou and Dingxi-24e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Longchun-8139 showed a lower number of tillering nodes, highest harvest index and yield in contrast to Heshangtou and Dingxi-24 under enhanced ultraviolet-B radiation and drought.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1973–2152 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–109 · show in text ↑

uv · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

25 papers: 8 positive, 17 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

radiation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

39 papers: 23 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

uv · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

45 papers: 19 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

light · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

68 papers: 33 positive, 35 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

light · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

85 papers: 46 positive, 39 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 46 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

drought · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

431 papers: 86 positive, 345 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 343 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

427 papers more in this group

See all 431 papers →

drought · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

632 papers: 95 positive, 537 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 537 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

628 papers more in this group

See all 632 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.