Paper · 2025 · Field Crops Research

Yield and grain number formation as affected by pre- and post-anthesis heat waves and thinning in two contrasting wheat cultivars

Breno Bicego; Jinwook Kim; Roxana Savin; et al.

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Wheat is essential to global food security however climate change threatens its yield. While the impacts of gradual temperature increases are known, the effects of heat waves (HW), which are becoming more frequent and severe, are less understood particularly under field conditions. This study explores the impact of pre- and post-anthesis (AN) HW on grain yield (GY), grain number (GN), average grain weight (AGW), and physiological determinants of GN. To quantify the pre- and post-AN HW effects on GY, GN and AGW of two cultivars with constitutive contrasting levels of GN and AGW; to determine whether a higher or lower sensitivity to a HW would be related to genotypic inherent characteristic; and to ascertain whether penalties in GN due to pre-AN HW are direct on reproductive output or indirect by affecting crop growth. Most details on AGW determination are offered in the companion paper. Experiments were irrigated and carried out in two locations of NE Spain. Main treatments consisted in the factorial combination of two contrasting genotypes (Pistolo of high AGW and Sublim of high GN), and three HW that were imposed in the field using portable tents covered with transparent polyethylene films, but with the base opened to favour air circulation, during 9–11 continuous days, increasing temperatures during the day only, which resulted in average daily temperature 3–4 ºC warmer. The HW started either at booting (pre-AN HW) or 15 days after anthesis (post-AN HW). An additional HW (combination of pre- and post-AN HW) was imposed in one location while thinning treatment at the onset of stem elongation in the other. Under unheated conditions, both cultivars had similarly high yields. The increment of yield potential with thinning was lower in Pistolo (33 %) than Sublim (79 %). Both cultivars had similar spike number plasticity, but only Sublim showed spike fertility plasticity to added resources as well. HW significantly reduced GY: Pistolo was more sensitive to pre-AN HW, but not to post-AN HW. Yield losses were mainly due to reduced GN with pre-AN HW, and reduced AGW with post-AN HW. Pre-AN HW increased floret mortality mostly in central spikelets, while thinning boosted floret survival, especially in distal spikelets, restoring fertility even in typically sterile basal spikelets. Thinning reduced HW damage in Pistolo from 18 % to 1 %, but not in Sublim (c. 14 % in both conditions). This implies that HW effects could be mainly indirect, through affecting growth, or mainly direct, affecting floret developmental process (and not reversed when more assimilates become available), depending on the genotype. Post-AN HW caused greater GY penalties (24.8 %) than pre-AN HW (15.1 %), but this seemed related to environmental variation during treatments than a true greater sensitivity. More in depth analyses regarding AGW is provided in the companion paper. The HW treatment consistently reduced yield, with GN mainly affected when applied pre-anthesis and AGW when imposed during grain filling. However, the magnitude of these penalties differed between genotypes and seemed to be resource driven in one but not in the other genotype. This indicates that a pre-AN HW can impair spike fertility and consequently grain yield, and that genotype-specific responses may reflect direct effects on reproduction or indirect effects via reduced source strength. Responses to HW seemed not to be a genotypic constitutive characteristic, as the response changes between cultivars depending on the timing of the HW and the GY strategies, making breeding for HW resilience less straightforward. Breeding programs should not solely consider the particular yield component strategies when selecting for yield stability under stress. The plasticity to resource availability seemed unrelated to that for HW. • GY sensitivity to heat wave (HW) did not clearly depend on the genotypic GY components strategy and availability of resources. • Sensitivity of GN spike −1 to pre-anthesis HW was partially driven by increased floret mortality, mainly through grain abortion. • The response of a yield component to heat stress seemed to be inversely related to the relevance of that component. • Effects of HW varies with timing and GY strategies, not solely due to fixed genotypic traits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under unheated conditions, Pistolo and Sublim had similarly high yields.

Outcome
similarly high yieldse0
Qualifier
Under unheated conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under unheated conditions, both cultivars had similarly high yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1634–1701 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thinning increased Pistolo yield potential by 33%.

Material
Pistoloe0
Treatment
thinninge0
Outcome
yield potentiale0
Direction
incremente0
Value
33 %e0
Comparator
Sublime0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increment of yield potential with thinning was lower in Pistolo (33 %) than Sublim (79 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1703–1796 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thinning increased Sublim yield potential by 79%.

Material
Sublime0
Treatment
thinninge0
Outcome
yield potentiale0
Direction
incremente0
Value
79 %e0
Comparator
Pistoloe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increment of yield potential with thinning was lower in Pistolo (33 %) than Sublim (79 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1703–1796 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both cultivars showed similar spike-number plasticity.

Outcome
similar spike number plasticitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both cultivars had similar spike number plasticity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1798–1848 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only Sublim showed spike-fertility plasticity to added resources.

Material
Sublime0
Outcome
spike fertility plasticity to added resourcese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only Sublim showed spike fertility plasticity to added resources as well”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1854–1926 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat waves significantly reduced grain yield.

Treatment
HWe0
Outcome
GYe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HW significantly reduced GY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1928–1955 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pistolo was more sensitive to pre-anthesis heat waves.

Material
Pistoloe0
Outcome
sensitive to pre-AN HWe0
Direction
more sensitivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pistolo was more sensitive to pre-AN HW, but not to post-AN HW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1957–2019 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pistolo was not more sensitive to post-anthesis heat waves.

Material
Pistoloe0
Outcome
post-AN HWe0
Direction
note0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pistolo was more sensitive to pre-AN HW, but not to post-AN HW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1957–2019 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-anthesis heat waves reduced grain number.

Treatment
pre-AN HWe0
Outcome
GNe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced GN with pre-AN HW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2053–2078 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-anthesis heat waves reduced average grain weight.

Treatment
post-AN HWe0
Outcome
AGWe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced AGW with post-AN HW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2084–2111 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-anthesis heat waves increased floret mortality, chiefly in central spikelets.

Organ / stage
central spikeletse0
Treatment
Pre-AN HWe0
Outcome
floret mortalitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pre-AN HW increased floret mortality mostly in central spikelets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2113–2177 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thinning increased floret survival, especially in distal spikelets.

Organ / stage
distal spikeletse0
Treatment
thinninge0
Outcome
floret survivale0
Direction
boostede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“thinning boosted floret survival, especially in distal spikelets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2185–2249 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thinning restored fertility in usually sterile basal spikelets.

Organ / stage
basal spikeletse0
Treatment
thinninge0
Outcome
fertilitye0
Direction
restoringe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while thinning boosted floret survival, especially in distal spikelets, restoring fertility even in typically sterile basal spikelets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2179–2312 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thinning reduced heat-wave damage in Pistolo from 18% to 1%.

Material
Pistoloe0
Treatment
Thinninge0
Outcome
HW damagee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
1 %e0
Qualifier
18 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thinning reduced HW damage in Pistolo from 18 % to 1 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2314–2368 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thinning did not reduce heat-wave damage in Sublim, around 14% in both conditions.

Material
Sublime0
Treatment
Thinninge0
Outcome
14 % in both conditionse0
Value
14 %e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thinning reduced HW damage in Pistolo from 18 % to 1 %, but not in Sublim (c. 14 % in both conditions)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2314–2416 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-anthesis heat waves caused a 24.8% grain-yield penalty.

Treatment
Post-AN HWe0
Outcome
GY penaltiese0
Direction
greatere0
Value
24.8 %e0
Comparator
pre-AN HWe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Post-AN HW caused greater GY penalties (24.8 %) than pre-AN HW (15.1 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2642–2713 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-anthesis heat waves caused a 15.1% grain-yield penalty.

Treatment
pre-AN HWe0
Outcome
GY penaltiese0
Direction
greatere0
Value
15.1 %e0
Comparator
Post-AN HWe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Post-AN HW caused greater GY penalties (24.8 %) than pre-AN HW (15.1 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2642–2713 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–119 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The apparent timing difference in yield penalties may reflect environmental variation during treatment.

Outcome
greater sensitivitye0
Qualifier
environmental variation during treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this seemed related to environmental variation during treatments than a true greater sensitivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2719–2815 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–119 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat-wave responses varied with timing and yield strategies rather than fixed cultivar traits.

Outcome
Effects of HW varies with timing and GY strategiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Effects of HW varies with timing and GY strategies, not solely due to fixed genotypic traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4204–4296 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–119 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Breeding programs should consider more than yield-component strategy when selecting heat-stable wheat.

Outcome
should not solely consider the particular yield component strategies when selecting for yield stability under stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Breeding programs should not solely consider the particular yield component strategies when selecting for yield stability under stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3615–3749 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–119 · show in text ↑

pruning · survival · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

pruning · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

pruning · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

93 papers: 33 positive, 60 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

89 papers more in this group

See all 93 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.