Paper · 2026 · The Plant Journal

A genome‐wide atlas of small secreted peptides ( SSPs ) in cotton identifies GDRP as a novel peptide hormone‐enhancing drought tolerance via ABA and MAPK signaling

Shuaiqi Lu; Teng Wang; Pengying Yang; et al.

17
claims
29
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) and sea-island cotton (Gossypium barbadense) are the two most widely cultivated cotton species, differing in their fiber quality and environmental adaptability. Small secreted peptides (SSPs) are key signaling molecules that regulate plant development and stress responses, yet their genome-wide diversity and functional roles in cotton remain largely uncharacterized. Here, leveraging high-quality genome assemblies, we systematically identified 2629 and 2331 SSPs in G. hirsutum and G. barbadense, respectively. Transcriptomic analyses revealed distinct species SSP expression dynamics: Expressed SSPs number declined during fiber and ovule development in G. hirsutum, but increased in G. barbadense, implicating SSPs in the superior fiber traits of the latter. Under abiotic stress, G. hirsutum displayed a predominantly downregulated SSPs profile, whereas G. barbadense maintained a more balanced transcriptional response, suggesting divergent stress adaptation strategies. Among the differentially expressed SSPs, we identified and characterized GDRP (Gossypium Drought and Salt Resistance Peptide), a novel peptide strongly induced by both drought and salt stress. Exogenous application of GDRP significantly enhanced stress tolerance by reducing oxidative damage, improving water-use efficiency, and promoting stomatal closure. VIGS (Virus-Induced Gene Silencing) experiments have demonstrated that GhGDRP6 acts as a positive regulatory factor for drought tolerance. Mechanistically, GDRP activated abscisic acid (ABA) signaling by upregulating GhPYL4 and GhNACs, and repressing GhPP2Cs and GhPIP2;7, key negative regulators of ABA-mediated drought responses. Furthermore, GDRP induced the phosphorylation of GhMPK3 and GhMPK6, two central kinases in the MAPK signaling cascade. Virus-induced gene silencing of GhMPK3 or GhMPK6 abolished GDRP-mediated drought tolerance, confirming a MAPK3/6-dependent mechanism. Collectively, this study provides the first genome-wide SSP atlas in cotton and uncovers GDRP as a previously uncharacterized peptide that modulates ABA and MAPK signaling to enhance abiotic stress resilience. These findings lay the foundation for peptide-based crop improvement strategies targeting stress tolerance and yield stability in cotton.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. hirsutum has 2629 small secreted peptides identified genome-wide.

Taxon
G. hirsutumGossypium hirsutume0
Outcome
SSPse0
Value
2629e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we systematically identified 2629 and 2331 SSPs in G. hirsutum and G. barbadense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–533 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. barbadense has 2331 small secreted peptides identified genome-wide.

Taxon
G. barbadenseGossypium barbadensee0
Outcome
SSPse0
Value
2331e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we systematically identified 2629 and 2331 SSPs in G. hirsutum and G. barbadense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–533 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Expressed SSP number declined during fiber and ovule development in G. hirsutum.

Taxon
G. hirsutumGossypium hirsutume1
Organ / stage
fiber and ovule developmente1
Outcome
Expressed SSPs numbere1
Direction
declinede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Expressed SSPs number declined during fiber and ovule development in G. hirsutum, but increased in G. barbadense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–736 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Expressed SSP number increased during fiber and ovule development in G. barbadense.

Taxon
G. barbadenseGossypium barbadensee1
Organ / stage
fiber and ovule developmente1
Outcome
Expressed SSPs numbere1
Direction
increasede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Expressed SSPs number declined during fiber and ovule development in G. hirsutum, but increased in G. barbadense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–736 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under abiotic stress, G. hirsutum showed a predominantly downregulated SSP profile.

Taxon
G. hirsutumGossypium hirsutume2
Treatment
abiotic stresse2
Outcome
SSPs profilee2
Direction
downregulatede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Under abiotic stress, G. hirsutum displayed a predominantly downregulated SSPs profile, whereas G. barbadense maintained a more balanced transcriptional response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–960 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under abiotic stress, G. barbadense maintained a more balanced transcriptional response.

Taxon
G. barbadenseGossypium barbadensee2
Treatment
abiotic stresse2
Outcome
transcriptional responsee2
Qualifier
more balancede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Under abiotic stress, G. hirsutum displayed a predominantly downregulated SSPs profile, whereas G. barbadense maintained a more balanced transcriptional response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–960 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GDRP, a novel peptide, is strongly induced by drought and salt stress.

Taxon
GossypiumGossypiume3
Treatment
drought and salt stresse3
Gene
GDRPe3
Outcome
GDRPe3
Direction
strongly inducede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium
Gossypium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)H. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“we identified and characterized GDRP (Gossypium Drought and Salt Resistance Peptide), a novel peptide strongly induced by both drought and salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exogenous GDRP reduced oxidative damage in cotton.

Treatment
Exogenous application of GDRPe4
Outcome
oxidative damagee4
Direction
reducinge4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e4

“Exogenous application of GDRP significantly enhanced stress tolerance by reducing oxidative damage, improving water-use efficiency, and promoting stomatal closure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1368 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exogenous GDRP improved water-use efficiency in cotton.

Treatment
Exogenous application of GDRPe4
Outcome
water-use efficiencye4
Direction
improvinge4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e4

“Exogenous application of GDRP significantly enhanced stress tolerance by reducing oxidative damage, improving water-use efficiency, and promoting stomatal closure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1368 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exogenous GDRP promoted stomatal closure in cotton.

Treatment
Exogenous application of GDRPe4
Outcome
stomatal closuree4
Direction
promotinge4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e4

“Exogenous application of GDRP significantly enhanced stress tolerance by reducing oxidative damage, improving water-use efficiency, and promoting stomatal closure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1368 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Exogenous GDRP significantly enhanced stress tolerance in cotton.

Treatment
Exogenous application of GDRPe4
Outcome
stress tolerancee4
Direction
significantly enhancede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e4

“Exogenous application of GDRP significantly enhanced stress tolerance by reducing oxidative damage, improving water-use efficiency, and promoting stomatal closure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1368 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GhGDRP6 acts as a positive regulatory factor for drought tolerance in cotton, shown by VIGS.

Treatment
VIGSe5
Gene
GhGDRP6e5
Outcome
drought tolerancee5
Direction
positivee5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e5

“VIGS (Virus-Induced Gene Silencing) experiments have demonstrated that GhGDRP6 acts as a positive regulatory factor for drought tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1507 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GDRP activates ABA signaling in cotton by upregulating GhPYL4 and GhNACs and repressing GhPP2Cs and GhPIP2;7.

Treatment
GDRPe6
Gene
GhPYL4e6
Outcome
abscisic acid (ABA) signalinge6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e6

“GDRP activated abscisic acid (ABA) signaling by upregulating GhPYL4 and GhNACs, and repressing GhPP2Cs and GhPIP2;7, key negative regulators of ABA-mediated drought responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1526–1700 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GDRP upregulates GhPYL4 and GhNACs in cotton.

Treatment
GDRPe6
Gene
GhPYL4e6
Outcome
GhPYL4 and GhNACse6
Direction
upregulatinge6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e6

“GDRP activated abscisic acid (ABA) signaling by upregulating GhPYL4 and GhNACs, and repressing GhPP2Cs and GhPIP2;7, key negative regulators of ABA-mediated drought responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1526–1700 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GDRP represses GhPP2Cs and GhPIP2;7 in cotton.

Treatment
GDRPe6
Gene
GhPP2Cse6
Outcome
GhPP2Cs and GhPIP2;7e6
Direction
repressinge6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e6

“GDRP activated abscisic acid (ABA) signaling by upregulating GhPYL4 and GhNACs, and repressing GhPP2Cs and GhPIP2;7, key negative regulators of ABA-mediated drought responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1526–1700 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GDRP induced phosphorylation of GhMPK3 and GhMPK6 in cotton.

Treatment
GDRPe7
Gene
GhMPK3e7
Outcome
phosphorylation of GhMPK3 and GhMPK6e7
Direction
inducede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e7

“Furthermore, GDRP induced the phosphorylation of GhMPK3 and GhMPK6, two central kinases in the MAPK signaling cascade”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1702–1819 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Virus-induced silencing of GhMPK3 or GhMPK6 abolished GDRP-mediated drought tolerance in cotton.

Treatment
Virus-induced gene silencing of GhMPK3 or GhMPK6e0
Gene
GhMPK3 or GhMPK6e0
Outcome
GDRP-mediated drought tolerancee0
Direction
abolishede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“Virus-induced gene silencing of GhMPK3 or GhMPK6 abolished GDRP-mediated drought tolerance, confirming a MAPK3/6-dependent mechanism”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1821–1953 · show in text ↑

loss of function · tolerance: abiotic · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 17 positive, 40 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.